re: .

No the ball popped out of his hands when he hit the ground

He didn't complete the act of the catch. It's a pretty cut and dry rule. The ground caused the ball to pop free and he re caught it. At the point it hit the ground and went airborne it was not a catch.

Logically? Yes.

By the rule? No.

The rule should have been changed years ago

Yes, I actually thought Dez was reaching for the goal line with the ball.

The ground clearly aided the catch

Yes

Yes and I hate the cowgirls

That's how I feel, but people don't care. They know a catch when they see one and it's hard to disagree

But it's textbook IMO: no catch

By rule, it is not a catch. Bad rule, but that's the rule.