Started By
Message

re: $20 mil Over to $20 mil Under the Cap in 3 Easy Steps(and Lose Only 3 Players)

Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:15 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:15 pm to
Financially it makes more since to cut Evans over Grubbs. I think a pay cut is the only thing that can save him. At this point I think Grubbs is also outplaying Evans(though that's not saying much).

If Colston plays hardball and doesn't take a pay cut it could get interesting.

I really don't see Lofton getting cut. Plays about every snap, makes all the calls, and is the de facto leader and we are extremely short on those on defense.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Especially since Payton/Loomis have hit home runs on their last two mid-priced FA CB signings.
And the fact that the Saints have bombed on literally every CB we've drafted outside of Porter and Molden.

And that's ever, not just under Payton/Loomis. We literally can not draft a (good/long term)corner.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 9:17 pm
Posted by oncealurker
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2013
5064 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:18 pm to
Ahhh you make it sound so simple
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166511 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:19 pm to
Start fresh on the whole interior
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Start fresh on the whole interior
My personal preference.

They did shock me and make about every move I said they should last year(though I thought Moore and Harper could have taken pay cuts instead; maybe they said no?).
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32996 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:24 pm to
Evans was drafted and is a Payton guy. He's a 5 time Pro Bowler (2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013) and 4 time First team All-Pro (2009, 2010, 2011, 2012) and 1 time Second-team All-Pro (2013) and was with us when we won the Super Bowl. I just don't see Evans not being a Saint anytime soon.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:30 pm to
I get all that, but a) he didn't deserve that pro bowl last year and b) you could say almost the same things about Harper.

His play does not justify his salary. If he takes a pay cut I could see him staying. If not he should be cut. I want him cut regardless(and I was a big defender of him last year when he was hurt).
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

On the guards, yeah very unlikely we cut both and we could keep both


If we can get a decent guard in FA and another in the draft, I can see them cutting both.
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:49 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166511 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:54 pm to
He was saying brees has no incentive to take a paycut
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30139 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:56 pm to
@euquol paycut =/= restructuring. Brees has every incentive to extend his contract though, which would lessen his cap hit.

As for Evans/Grubbs, Evans is gone. He's finished, done, etc...hes' getting manhandled and seriously him and goodwin are the reason why Brees gets pressured so much. 4/5 times a bad throw or sack is due to those two.

Cutting Grubbs this year is not worth it imo. He's only going to save 3.6mil while losing 6mil in dead money. It'd make more sense next year when its 3.0 dead and 7.3mil in savings. He's not as bad as Evans and I'm sure his play will improve with a better center and RG.

Cutting Evans and Grubbs means we need to sign one (Iupati) and draft one (Collins perhaps). I don't see both getting cut, but weirder things have happened.

We might just designate Grubbs to be a June 1 cut.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 9:59 pm
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

He was saying brees has no incentive to take a paycut


In the same section he talks about extending Brees' contract and how Brees has all the leverage. Brees has no incentive to do what Brady and Manning did for their teams (and likely will not). Read it again.
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:04 pm to
I read the article to say Brees will still want $20 million per year even in an extended contract so its best to wait until his contract year to even try anything.
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

@euquol paycut =/= restructuring. Brees has every incentive to extend his contract though, which would lessen his cap hit.


He has zero incentive. He knows the Saints are in no position to trade or cut. He has the Saints by the proverbial balls.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30139 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

I read the article to say Brees will still want $20 million per year even in an extended contract so its best to wait until his contract year to even try anything.



at 20mil/yr and the cap going up, hard numbers tell a complete lie. 20mil with a salary cap of 145mil is 13.8% of the total cap.

Just a few years back, 18mil was the elite (Brady/Manning) cost which was on a 120mil salary cap. That comes out to 15%.

So really, 20mil is still fine. sign him to it and ease the cap situation the next 2 years so we can have a shot. It took 1 year for Brady to turn his numbers back into elite tier. Better receivers, better protection. they were in cap situations as well, but we can get it done.
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:15 pm to
If Brees were really a team player he would do with Brady did - his cap hit never exceeds $15 million and that is all the way in 2017.

This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 10:16 pm
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49527 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

He has zero incentive


If he wants the team to play better, then yes, he does. Giving him a one year extension with an non guaranteed 2017 base salary of, say, $35m (make up any high number you want, the Saints and Brees know he wouldn't see it) would allow us to spread some of his 2015 base salary across two additional seasons. They do this by converting base salary into signing bonus. When this happens, the team pays him that money immediately rather than evenly over 17 weeks of the season. This whole setup gives Brees just as much leverage as before. Do you think Brees is going to say "No thanks, the idea of making interest on ~$7m over the next 6 months doesn't appeal to me."
Posted by SuperSoakher
Member since Jun 2012
4585 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:19 pm to
While this doesn't sound too complicated, how do you know this? Or where did you learn about this?
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:20 pm to
Frankly if he's not willing to do a Brady like deal, I say we let him play out his contract instead of kicking the can further down the road to hurt the team when he's 40 and no longer here.

To me it's worth the risk to see if he will shite the bed again the next 2 seasons.
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49527 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

While this doesn't sound too complicated, how do you know this? Or where did you learn about this?



overthecap has a tool that you can play around with. Otherwise, askthecommish has a decent amount of info on the salary cap. Simply understanding what happens when a player with guaranteed money left on their deal is cut will go a long way.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram