Started By
Message

Two Hunters Shoot the Same Buck, Owner Decided with Coin Toss

Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:23 am
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
49016 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:23 am
LINK

quote:

DJ Jorgenson was hunting with his son, Kameron, near the town of Oneida, Wisconsin when the boy shot and wounded the buck. The deer then ran off into private property, where another hunter managed to finish it off.

quote:

The landowner, Randy Heyrman, indicated that Jorgenson’s intial shot only wounded the deer in the leg and said it took an additional two shots to put the animal down. The hunters met at the edge of Heyrman’s property to discuss who would get the buck.

quote:

The Jorgensons and Heyrman decided to settle the matter with an old-fashioned coin toss, which the Jorgensons lost. Before they left, the young hunter took a quick picture with the buck he could not keep. DJ Jorgenson remarked that he believed the decision was fair, but remained disappointed that his son will have only a picture to remember the deer by



I guess I can see where the land owner is the one that actually killed the deer but no way could I claim a deer that an 11 year old shot and tracked.. idk but seems like a dick move







ETA: After further review, the ruling on the coin toss stands, 2nd guy's buck






just seems to me like the guy acted like a dick.. idk
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 9:29 am
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:38 am to
2 years ago I had this exact same situation. Saw the buck chasing a doe and passed on him. He ran on the neighbors property and the neighbor shot 3 times hitting him once in the leg just as the one pictured is. Buck comes back by me and I dropped him. After a short discussion on his shot vs mine I kept the deer.
Posted by tiddlesmcdiddles
Lafayette, LA
Member since Apr 2013
1719 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:45 am to
if that landowner hadn't shot it, then the boy probably wouldn't even have "just a picture of the the deer"
Posted by aVatiger
Water
Member since Jan 2006
27967 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

no way could I claim a deer that an 11 year old shot and tracked.. idk but seems like a dick move



i thought the same exact same thing, hat

but, then again, i wasn't out in the field fighting with a eleven year old over future grilled strap


you gotta give the deer to the kid though
Posted by TigerTerd
Member since Sep 2010
2663 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:55 am to
My dad had a similar situation happen in Williana WMA. Guys shot a big buck (10 pt I believe) in the arse or something.. Came running on my dad about 400 yards down or so. Then my dad finished him off. But he never heard from the hunter lookin for it or anything. It is mounted in my dads house now
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:06 am to
I'd have given the kid the deer.

Adult may be a different story. But a kid? Come on.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
57374 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:16 am to
Good lesson for the young man. Shoot better.

In the days past didnt you just call 'hide or horns'?
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:17 am to
I would've told the kid I shot it in the leg and his shot was a kill shot. Kid gets deer. Maybe I'm a nice guy though
Posted by Yellerhammer5
Member since Oct 2012
10880 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:44 am to
I would have kept the buck and given the kid a participation ribbon.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52216 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:45 am to
Landowner is a jackass. They could have at least split the meat and let the kid have the head for a possible mount.
Posted by wiltznucs
Apollo Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2005
9005 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:51 am to
Put in the situation and assuming the landowner has probably killed a few deer in his time I'd give the deer to the boy and perhaps ask for a backstrap.

Mental note, I should open an ammo shop in Oneida, WI as those Cheeseheads apparently need 3 shots for every deer.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29588 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:52 am to
My initial thoughts:

1. You got to give that kid that deer or at least split the meat.

2. However, when I hear stories like this I now assume there is more to the story. I wonder if the landowner hadn't had problems with this happening with the kid's dad or other people hunting the neighboring property. That being said, kudos to the kid and his dad for not crossing the fence to go after the deer, but I do wonder if the kid and the landowner were hunting within sight of each other. That's kind of scary.

My older cousins tell a story about a hunt where my grandfather with his kids on one side (so my dad and uncles) and my grandfather's in-laws (so my great grandfather and his sons) stood over a deer shot arguing over which side got a deer that had been hit a couple of times when they were running dogs. Evidently it got really heated among a bunch of rednecks with loaded guns.

But that was before my family got a little less trashy and stopped running dogs.
Posted by Palo Gaucho
Benton
Member since Jul 2013
3342 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Randy Heyrman


What a dick. Unbelievable that a grown man wouldn't want the kid to have that deer, regardless of who fired the fatal shot.
Posted by ChiefBowman
Member since Sep 2014
67 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 1:23 pm to
maybe the dad should teach his son to aim better
Posted by crankbait
Member since Feb 2008
11625 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 1:39 pm to
The fact that the guy even thought of taking that deer from that kid means he is a douche. It's pretty embarrassing.

On a side note, I know/knew a guy that shot a basket 8 on a WMA and then another guy shot him as well, about 150 yards away, also with a bow. Both had decent shots, and the deer died soon after the second arrow. There wasn't a bunch of bullshite about it, they talked and shook hands, forget how it ended up. There was a news paper article about it
Posted by AngryBeavers
Member since Jun 2012
4554 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 2:24 pm to
Rifle season is short in WI. I have friends up there that go years without getting a buck. I can understand the land owner not wanting to give it up especially when the kid just hit it in the leg.
Posted by LSUTiger205
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Aug 2006
10820 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 7:02 pm to
They have two weeks of rifle season up there, pretty sure. When I lived in Milwaukee the schools were all closed for the first week. That's serious business up there. Why not split the deer with the family
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
92723 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 7:26 pm to
It's not even a very big buck. Technically it should go to the landowner, but anyone with a heart would have just let the kid have it.
Posted by Sparkplug#1
Member since May 2013
7352 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 9:18 pm to
Why would you give a deer to someone that didn't kill it?
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 9:19 pm
Posted by GreenTrout
Toledo Bend
Member since Jul 2013
1010 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 7:08 am to
If I was the landowner, it would have all depended on how the dad acted. If the dad's teaching the boy what he did wrong, and trying to make a man out of him I would kindly let the lad have it. If the dad acted like one of the entitled-queens who shop at Wal-Mart...I probably would have kept it and kicked 'em off my land.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram