Started By
Message
locked post

Newly discovered dinosaur weighed 65 tons

Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:37 am
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8334 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:37 am
LINK

Measurements of bones from its leg and arm revealed that the animal was 65 tons, and still growing when it died in the Patagonian hills of Argentina about 77 million years ago.

“To put this in perspective, an African elephant is about 5 tons, T. rex is 8 tons, Diplodocus is 18 tons, and a Boeing 737 is around 50 tons,” said study author and paleontologist Kenneth Lacovara at Drexel University. “And then you have Dreadnoughtus at 65 tons.”
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61757 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:38 am to
Y'all think dinosaurs would have been good table fare?
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87207 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:39 am to
I wish I was in this interesting but total bullshite field just so I could come out and claim it was actually 68 tons and Dr. Lacovara is a hack.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19394 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Dreadnoughtus


tf?
Posted by Fusaichi Pegasus
Meh He Co
Member since Oct 2010
14705 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:41 am to
bullshite
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74166 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:41 am to
I bet some of them had to taste really good. Warm blooded lizards more like giant fowl.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36744 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:42 am to
The fatty ones. I bet they taste like chicken
Posted by KingRanch
The Ranch
Member since Mar 2012
61757 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:42 am to
I'm thinking any of the plant eaters would have been delicious.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
36205 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:42 am to
gawwwww that's pretty wild
Posted by Phil A Sheo
equinsu ocha
Member since Aug 2011
12166 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:43 am to
Something seems a bit off

Posted by LSUzealot
Napoleon and Magazine
Member since Sep 2003
57656 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:43 am to
Posted by emoney
Westerville, OH
Member since May 2010
8751 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Based on the width and strength of its skeleton, toppling over would likely spell death for such a heavy animal.


Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84507 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:44 am to
I'm picturing huge dreadnoughtocus sex right now
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

“I would imagine [Dreadnoughtus] would have had a very similar nesting behavior: the congregation of hundreds or thousands of 60 ton females gathering together to nest in a lost valley somewhere,” he said.


No wonder Pangea broke apart.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36744 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:44 am to
The dinosaur is more dense
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
103974 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Y'all think dinosaurs would have been good table fare?


Maybe the little ones.
Posted by Sir Drinksalot
Member since Aug 2005
16868 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:44 am to
Finally, a cool name.

So many boring names for so long.
Posted by Mung
Ba’on Rooj
Member since Aug 2007
9267 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:45 am to
clearly, they couldn't take two of those on the ark, so it went extinct.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74166 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:45 am to
Them eggs too. One fried egg could feed a dozen people.

Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50729 posts
Posted on 9/4/14 at 9:46 am to
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram