Started By
Message

What advantage, if any, is having rotating QBs

Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:12 pm
Posted by White Tiger
Dallas
Member since Jul 2007
12830 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:12 pm
I can think of no advantage for the offense. Does it not make it more predictable based on the skill set of the signal caller? How can it keep the opposing defense off balance? It just makes no sense to me.

My take is that CLM does not like what he sees in Jennings passing ability. I cannot believe that he thinks LSU will just line up and blow every other team off the line as its running game amasses more than 300 yds/gm and tilts the TOP way in favor of the Bayou Bengals.

On the other hand, what if the LSU defense is all that? Hmmmm
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
42099 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:14 pm to
Less fatigue? That's about all I can think of as an advantage.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

My take is that CLM does not like what he sees in Jennings passing ability.


Harris gonna start
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35860 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:14 pm to
If you have 2 qb's, you don't have one
Posted by tlsu15
Capital of Texas
Member since Aug 2011
10140 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:15 pm to
Both QBs do some things well, and need to improve on others. If you can't tell which is 1 and which is 2, put them both out their on the field until it's obvious. This isn't that hard to comprehend.
Posted by madddoggydawg
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
6597 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:15 pm to
You take pressure off both guys by letting them know they can screw-up and not get pulled for the game. This preserves Harris's confidence if he's not aces out the gate or makes a critical error. Also allows the QB to prove it on the field, instead of making the call from practice alone.
Posted by jaydoubleyew
Downtown
Member since Oct 2011
726 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:16 pm to
I think the offensive line will be able to control Wisky, so it might not matter this week. Past that idk man.
Posted by KG5989
Das Boot
Member since Oct 2010
16333 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:17 pm to
Defense has to worry about 2 diff looks... especially if they have diff skill sets...

Thats about it though.
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
76093 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

I can think of no advantage for the offense


There is none.

Signed,

Chris Leak and Tim Tebow

Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
41827 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:37 pm to
There are several obvious advantages.

1. If the most talented guy still isn't ready it allows him time to develop while you get the advantage of better QBing while the less talented, but ready, guy plays.

2. True freshman usually don't have the best grasp of the playbook and fundamentals. They get everything straight before the game, but as the game wears on they lose it. It helps to sit them on the bench for a series or two, so they can settle down.

3. Different skill sets force the opponent to spend valuable practice time preparing for each.
Posted by themunch
There
Member since Jan 2007
67649 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 8:53 pm to
It must be the 'in' thing this year tho
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26577 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 9:01 pm to
To find out which one is better when the lights are on
Posted by aaronb023
TeamBunt CEO
Member since Feb 2005
11774 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 9:33 pm to
No advantage..only reason les isn't naming a starter is because they both suck and he's having a hard time picking the lesser of two evils

:|
This post was edited on 8/26/14 at 9:34 pm
Posted by mike4lsu
Baton Rouge,LA
Member since Sep 2005
1529 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 10:21 pm to
Prevents the other from transfering. If either one transfers, we will be left with no scholarship QB if the starter goes down.
Posted by LSUShock
Kansas
Member since Jun 2014
4999 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 10:31 pm to
I can't stand it, but I'm not getting paid $4 million a year to make that decision. I think it prevents momentum, confuses the O, decreases morale, etc. Unless you have two completely different QBs where one guy brings something new to the table (Tebow/Leak) I don't understand it. I guarantee it's failed 10x more than it's succeeded
Posted by PeaRidgeWatash
Down by the docks of the city
Member since Dec 2004
15210 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 10:52 pm to
This Saturday? So Les and Cam can decide who the starter will be for the rest of the season.
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10172 posts
Posted on 8/26/14 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

It just makes no sense to me.
It makes perfect sense that it makes no sense to somebody who doesn't understand football, even when he's seen it contribute to championships.
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 11:59 am to
None,all it will do is create confusion for these young QB's.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 12:12 pm to
The other team has to prepare for different offensive attacks
Posted by RANDY44
Member since Aug 2005
9572 posts
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:08 pm to
With similar skill-sets it should not be that predictable at first; not until a few games where play-calling patterns can be studied. Both can run and both can make every throw according to the coaches. We'll see. There is one huge, obvious advantage to the dual QB's. If an injury occurs, you've got someone coming in who's already geared into the game-plan rather than a sub who wasn't expecting to see meaningful p.t.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram