Started By
Message

re: Finally an answer to why Gandolf didn't just fly the ring to Mt Doom

Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:54 pm to
Posted by LSUTigers1986
Member since Mar 2014
1336 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:54 pm to
This isn't even the biggest plot hole in the series.

The biggest is them getting their asses saved at Mina's Tirith by a bunch of ghosts.
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35632 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:59 pm to
The King holds the ghost from entering into the next life. King dies. Many, many years go by and a new King Returns. That King says "if you fight, you are free". They fought, and now they're free. Pretty simple to understand for me.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58175 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 12:30 am to
neither of those are plot holes

did y'all even watch the movies or did you just have them on while you were doing other things?

you don't need the books to get this stuff.
Posted by Qwerty
Member since Dec 2010
2114 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 5:03 am to
Please explain how this is a plot hole.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30608 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 6:44 am to
quote:

The biggest is them getting their asses saved at Mina's Tirith by a bunch of ghosts.


So much fail. Did you even see the movie?
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13074 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 6:55 am to
quote:

It's not a plot hole. The eagles aren't mindless beasts for Gandalf to order around, they are highly intelligent beings whom aren't concerned with the affairs of mortals. Reading the additional Tolkien works would give these "plot hole" folks some enlightenment.


We saw what it took to involve the Ents.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:23 am to
Exactly and good point.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85276 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 7:43 am to
You bring up a good point, but not the one you intended. We did see what it took to get the ents moving. But we didn't see anything with the eagles. That's partly what makes it a Deus ex Machina. Not really a plot hole but a plot device to move the story along without any explanation. That's why this guy came up with this... To give an explanation. It's just for fun
Posted by LSUPERMAN
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
2529 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:18 am to
Of course all this would be moot if Elrond would have stopped the King's son from leaving Mount Doom in the first place.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27824 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Of course all this would be moot if Elrond would have stopped the King's son from leaving Mount Doom in the first place.


That free will bullshite is a motherfricker in the long run.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

You bring up a good point, but not the one you intended. We did see what it took to get the ents moving. But we didn't see anything with the eagles. That's partly what makes it a Deus ex Machina. Not really a plot hole but a plot device to move the story along without any explanation. That's why this guy came up with this... To give an explanation. It's just for fun



well there is this little bit about a major character being reduced to a moth for the movies. show biz, its a bitch.

again, anyone complaining of "plot holes" are hodors (yay for genre mashup)
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 8:58 am to
Did we ever get a full accounting of exactly what powers the ring has? I read it forever ago, and I was never totally sure of all of its capabilities.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:03 am to
its main purpose and power was to control those who possessed the other rings of power, which is why Sauron gave them to powerful kings of the other races. the one ring could also amplify the ring bearer's own natural powers. thats why a hobbit had to be the ring bearer - hobbits have no natural power, no great greed or hatred. one does wonder how frodo didnt become a giant fat slob though, second breakfast and all....
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:04 am to
It's because the eagles are hyperintellegent noble solitary beings that rarely fight any battles because they're powerful enough to be above the petty squabbles that happen below the mountains. And there's also the problem of the Nazgul. Which are ferocious fighters riding giant pterodactyl dragons.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67271 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:

And there's also the problem of the Nazgul. Which are ferocious fighters riding giant pterodactyl dragons.


I never understand why everyone seems to ignore this point
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:13 am to
quote:

I never understand why everyone seems to ignore this point



Because they're ignorant.

They always say "hey, there are only like 9 of those dudes in robes on these bird things, so a bunch of eagles should kill them no problem"

I think its because the movie failed to really explain what the Ring wraiths are.

They fail to acknowledge that the nazgul are ferocious viscous undead near invincible, immortal zombie fighting swordsman of the apocalypse, powered by the nine rings given by sauron, ruled by death himself, with powers and abilities greater than any man, and flying on giant fricking razor toothed, super agile, dragon beasts.
This post was edited on 8/6/14 at 9:14 am
Posted by Larry
Collierville, TN
Member since Jul 2004
5457 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:27 am to
quote:

The whole point of the trilogy was that it had to be someone undetected.


BINGO
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85276 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 9:32 am to
quote:

well there is this little bit about a major character being reduced to a moth for the movies. show biz, its a bitch.
I'm not talking about the movie...
Posted by PillageUrVillage
Mordor
Member since Mar 2011
14845 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:11 am to
quote:

That is some serious leap in logic.


This.

Tolkien was a language expert. In English “to fly” may also mean “to flee” or “to escape”. In fact there are many other instances in the books where Tolkien uses "fly" in which the obvious context is "flee" or "escape".
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34531 posts
Posted on 8/6/14 at 10:14 am to
quote:

It's not a plot hole. The eagles aren't mindless beasts for Gandalf to order around, they are highly intelligent beings whom aren't concerned with the affairs of mortals.
the problem is, there are multiple instances in both trilogies that they actually are there at Gandalf's whim.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram