- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:14 pm to CAD703X
quote:
if it was socially acceptable to cut your son's earlobes off or little toes off, would you bitch about people trying to warn you this is unnecessary?
Are you against piercing baby girls ears as well?
That's definitely going to happen to mine when she is out of momma.
The definition of mutilation is partly effecting appearance and function, cutting earlobes and and little toes would effect appearance. Circumcision isn't viewed as effecting appearance, so it is doesn't fit that.
This post was edited on 5/23/14 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:14 pm to Dam Guide
quote:
it fricking doesn't matter if you are or not.
You're right, i don't think it matter THAT much if you are or not, but to willingly want to cut off part of another person's genitals is fricked up.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:14 pm to colorchangintiger
quote:
cut their fingers off then.
dammit you beat me to it..i hadnt read this yet when i responded
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:15 pm to Motengator
quote:
Then their hands would not function properly.
everyone on here with no fingers would argue otherwise.
"my stubs are just fine..."
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:15 pm to colorchangintiger
quote:
I know several contractors that have lost fingers and there hands still work just fine
They are still missing fingers and they DO NOT have fully functioning hands.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:15 pm to Salmon
quote:
only if they tried to call it "mutilation"
One last time: Do you think FEMALE circ = "genital mutilation?"
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:16 pm to Salmon
quote:
only if they tried to call it "mutilation"
YOU'RE CHOPPING OFF YOUR SON'S FORESKIN.
part of his body.
how is this NOT mutilation?
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:16 pm to CAD703X
quote:
ammit you beat me to it..i hadnt read this yet when i responded
So, as usual, YOU PEOPLE, already have most of your arguments "ready to go". Fight on morons, neither side will give in. Enjoy your day.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:17 pm to CAD703X
quote:
everyone on here with no fingers would argue otherwise. "my stubs are just fine..."
Goes back to Mutilation definition again, that cutting off toes/fingers would effect a degrade in appearance and function. Appearance isn't effected, it is increased in the USA. Function is debatable.
This post was edited on 5/23/14 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:17 pm to Motengator
quote:
These are not socially acceptable
you do understand the usage of the word 'if' i use right?
or are you unwilling to think a little further on this subject than 'shut up and leave me alone to do what was done to me to my son'
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:18 pm to Dam Guide
quote:
Are you against piercing baby girls ears as well?
honestly, yes. why not let your daughter decide to do this when she's old enough so she has a personal stake in it.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:18 pm to CAD703X
quote:
why are you insecure about people wanting to warn you against repeating the same mistakes on your son made to you?
I have read your irrational idiotic ramblings about this several times. I had my son circumcised last week. So you suck at it.
And both our peni are better than yours.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:18 pm to CAD703X
cutting fingers off is not close to even being a decent argument
earlobe or little toe? yeah, I can see that, and I wouldn't really care
earlobe or little toe? yeah, I can see that, and I wouldn't really care
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:19 pm to Stringer Bell
quote:
Another reason why circumcision should be banned. It's genital mutilation
shut the frick up
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:19 pm to CAD703X
quote:
honestly, yes. why not let your daughter decide to do this when she's old enough so she has a personal stake in it.
I have known several girls that didn't have it done that wished they had it done earlier.
I have never heard of a single girl in person that regretted their parents doing it to them.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:19 pm to CAD703X
that article is from Nov of 2013. it happened in memphis. i don't recall hearing anything about it.
here is another article I found interesting.
i wonder why the mom chose to wait 3 months and not have the procedure done in the hospital by a pediatrician?
ETA-- 420, you will LOVE this article.
here is another article I found interesting.
i wonder why the mom chose to wait 3 months and not have the procedure done in the hospital by a pediatrician?
ETA-- 420, you will LOVE this article.
This post was edited on 5/23/14 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:20 pm to Motengator
quote:
already have most of your arguments "ready to go".
what argument is that exactly?
oh yeah, that we are trying to get you to wake up the possibility you've been duped into cutting off part of a body part.
quote:
Fight on morons
seems like you're the one with the closed mind unwilling to consider the idea that maybe you should let your son make the decision for himself.
once you've cut it off, he no longer has the choice.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:21 pm to GRTiger
quote:
have read your irrational idiotic ramblings about this several times. I had my son circumcised last week. So you suck at it.
sorry for your loss. now i understand your anger. you could have saved your son had you been in this thread a week ago.
I WILL NOT MAKE THAT MISTAKE.
eyes wide open friends.
Posted on 5/23/14 at 12:21 pm to CAD703X
for a supposed grown adult male, you are more dramatic than my 16 year old niece
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News