em745

That damn global warming.

MOAR:














(All of these courtesy of Skorge from forums.superiorpics)

(Geez, how did I miss this?!)

quote:

---

Her face & tits are so fine that it's pretty damn hard to make it to the rest of her, honestly.

---

I don't find it that hard, TBH...

Killer grin (the best in showbiz, IMO), killer shape (overall) and big ol' manga-girl eyes. She's also one of the very few women who can manage to convincingly pull off "cute," "gorgeous" and "sexy."

Oh, and she's double-jointed to boot:

quote:

---

I've seen better looking chicks in Rayville.

---

Such an astute assessment, coming from someone who finds Kate Upton hot. :rolleyes:

---

Anyways, just to add to the worthiness of this bump:

I usually like these unusual types of analog watches, but that is indeed an ugly one. Corum has a similar type "Golden Bridge" lineup that looks a whole lot better:

LINK

Too bad it costs about 77x more than the ugly one.

quote:

---

25 mph is absolutely practical for in city driving and as a taxi service

---

:lol:

quote:

---

Also, the Lexus and Toyota's that are 700,000+ miles accident free go well over that speed

---

Again, all under very controlled circumstances.

quote:

---

yes. Hell, they already do this.

---

Really now? They can accurately interpret a policeman's hand signals and other gesticulations (which can get quick and ambiguous depending on the situation)? Are they able to "see" who the signals are meant for?

Will these sensors be able to see/interpret a traffic wand at night, amongst a background of headlights, flashing emergency lights, and street lights? What if it's a regular joe (w/o a wand) doing the traffic control until the cops arrive?

We're not talking about the simple act of a cyclist signaling a left or right turn here.

quote:

---

quote:

---

How many airline disasters have been linked to malfunctioning software or "sensors?"

---

I bet that failure rate of the software is lower than humans.

---

Let's combine software failure with sensor, electronic and mechanical failures and see how they compare then.

quote:

---

The big issue has actually been how reliable the software has been.

---

The flip-side argument to all this is that I can come up with a ~dozen cases where an airline disaster was averted because of the improvised actions of a brilliant flight crew.

quote:

---

Pilots aren't as skilled outside of the autopilot.

---

:lol:

I have a really hard time accepting the notion of an autopilot being able to successfully pull off a "Sullenberger" all by itself.

quote:

---

A self-driving car will never get tired, distracted

---

They're also incapable of adapting to unforeseen (i.e. not programmed) situations, and on-the-fly problem solving.

quote:

---

or drunk

---

Much tougher DUI laws would go a longer way in eliminating DUI related fatalities.

quote:

---

and it can see farther than its human counterparts, see at night, and see in 360 degrees.

---

I see they left bad weather out of the equation... again.

quote:

---

but keep comparing it to windows.

---

Are Micro$oft products the only ones that are buggy?

quote:

---

They have radar sensors, roof sensors, camera sensors, etc.

---

All of which are susceptible to software glitches, hardware malfunctions, blockages from snow, ice, mud... not to mention regular ol' road damage from flying rocks.

quote:

---

use radar and data collection to react to it.

---

Will Google collect real-time data on individual workers and/or police directing traffic? Will the radar's back-end (software) be "smart" enough to accurately read hand signals 100% of the time?

What if it encounters a ball popping out between two parked cars... Will it be able to deduce that there might be a child nearby running after it?... Or will it just "stop and wait" every friggin time it encounters something that doesn't figure into its logic routines?

quote:

---

The car would probably make the correct decision to not drive at all

---

Yeah, that's a realistic approach.

quote:

---

but I think they can probably make that trip already. Just very slowly.

---

And what is "very slowly" relative to 25 mph? Walking speed?

quote:

---

Is it not impressive that they already drive better than 99% of the people on the road?

---

But that's not anywhere near the case.

These things only perform "well" within sterile/controlled parameters and testing environments... and as long as those myriad "sensors" remain functioning and unobstructed (which is why I brought up the winter storm scenario).

quote:

---

In what world is reducing or eliminating traffic accidents and fatalities, while also improving both time and fuel efficiency a "horrible" idea?

---

Another thing, people seem to forget that ALL automated systems are ultimately programmed by humans. Aside from sensor failures/damage (or obstructions due to snow, rain, mud...), there are bound to be software bugs and crashes. I mean, how many Windoze crashes have there been over the years? I've yet to encounter a piece of software, no matter how well written and stable, that doesn't have some kind of bug that makes it do something it shouldn't do, or do it in an incorrect manner. All that is inconsequential on a PC (from a safety's standpoint), but in a driverless car?? I'm not sure I'd want to imagine a scenario where one of these cars bugs out while driving though a school zone.

Like another said, I'm not a luddite. I'm not anti-progress and I'm all for driver aids that help in emergency situations. It's driver replacements that I have a huge problem with. No matter how "smart" computers get, they can never be programmed for adaptive reasoning and creative problem solving, things that an averagely smart human can manage without much fuss.

quote:

---

let me know when we get pics of the Royal pussy

---

(You're welcome.)

quote:

---

If you were being asked to choose between an OT 6 with a clean looking/smelling vag versus an OT 8 with a jungle and the stench... which one would you take?

---

Well, that clitoral hood and those hanging, wrinkly meat curtains do their fair share of trapping in dried-up menses, urine, smegma (yes, women produce smegma too) and grool... All of which contribute to "the stench."

Cutting away those useless hanging flaps at birth would go a long way in producing a "clean looking/smelling vag," no?

quote:

---

Who do you think is more likely to get a UTI. A circumcised person or an uncircumcised person?

---

Who do you think is more likely to get a UTI, an intact male or a FEMALE?

Who do you think is more likely to suffer from meatal stenosis, an intact male or a circ'd male?

quote:

---

she is 30. i'm 48.

---

:bow:

quote:

---

she's already on board with the decision to not mutilate if its a boy.

---

:bow: :bow: