Started By
Message

re: If you could choose one current "intellectual"

Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9142 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

David Friedman or Jeffrey Tucker.


Damn fine choices, sir.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

if they do then the last few remaining communists out there would like a word.


This is totally unrelated but I just like this meme.

Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55549 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:46 pm to
It's Tucker! He's not rocking the black-and-gold bowtie, I am dissapoint.
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9142 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:52 pm to
Tucker always reminds me of Donald Sutherland in Animal House.
Posted by todospm
Member since Sep 2013
526 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

although personally i do find him an extremist in that sense. I would like his writings on the media to be more circulated than they are.


I agree with most of this. Noam is an extremist, period. But a healthy democracy should make some room for radical viewpoints. Plus, by approaching issues from such an entirely different perspective, he offers a lot of interesting insights the rest of the country should at least consider. Now, if 60% of the populace started agreeing with Noam across the board, we'd have a problem.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63753 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

I'm gonna go w/ Tom Woods.


quote:

I think if more people knew about him and his arguments, minds would change about history, politics and economics pretty quickly.



He and Walter Block are the life of any party.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

libertarian socialist


Oxymoron?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55549 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

He and Walter Block are the life of any party.


Only if they are accompanied by Gary North.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63753 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Only if they are accompanied by Gary North.


Oh, my.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63753 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

you need building blocks for all major ideas/observations. at the LEAST, you can think about it along these lines


No. You're just wrong. Your simplistic"building blocks" actually retard nuanced debate and thought.

quote:

i see the world in shades of grey, but if you have no principles, you have nothing to say


Your dichotomy has little to do with "principles".
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9142 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

you need building blocks for all major ideas/observations. at the LEAST, you can think about it along these lines


No. You're just wrong. Your simplistic"building blocks" actually retard nuanced debate and thought




Can you name some of these "major ideas/observations" that DIDN'T have some "building blocks" to them?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425838 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Your simplistic"building blocks" actually retard nuanced debate and thought.



how?

quote:

Your dichotomy has little to do with "principles"

it's not a dichotomy

but if you ever get into world-building and philosophy created by contemporary super geniuses, it typically boils down to binary though

just fwiw
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425838 posts
Posted on 2/16/14 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

Can you name some of these "major ideas/observations" that DIDN'T have some "building blocks" to them?

i'm curious about this as well
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15927 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 12:03 am to
Boortz, then Sowell.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 12:20 am to
quote:

I'm gonna go w/ Tom Woods
Absolutely
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 12:24 am to
quote:

Blue Velvet


Post Moar.
Posted by Dalymaple
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
32 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 1:28 am to
I want to say James Buchanan but he passed away last year. Now it would have to be either Russ Roberts from econtalk or David Friedman.

Edit: Michael Huemer is up there as well - Ted Talk
This post was edited on 2/17/14 at 1:57 am
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 4:59 am to
Hitch, rest his his soul....


Salman Rushdie

Gore Vidal

But Hitch was da'man.....and became very much a fan of neo-conservativism late in life, inexplicably. Mostly due to his revulsion of organized religion and the Bush administrations willingness to take on the Jihadists....
Posted by SpartyGator
Detroit Lions fan
Member since Oct 2011
75715 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 6:51 am to
quote:

noam believes in anarchy under an organized, federal structure and believe libertarianism is a form of tyranny

like i said, his views are hypocritical. his whole schtick is like one big philosophy attempting to gather all talking points/memes of liberal-progressive thought. he uses big words and uses confusing wording to never derive a coherent, single philosophy

he celebrates socialist societies then claims he supports freedom. he calls limited government tyranny and supports anarchism...under a larger federal structure eliminating liberty and forcing a form of organization




good lord . Chomsky has always been interesting to me, though, even if I don't care for his views all the time.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63753 posts
Posted on 2/17/14 at 6:59 am to
quote:

in terms of socio-economic-political theories, there are 2 main groupings:

1. those who see humans as independent and capable of making their own decisions
2. those who see humans as sheep who need herding


I simply do not accept your premise (semantically, it is an editorial statement, and in terms of practicality it is not accurate). And, yes, the foregoing can be characterized as a "dichotomy".

Further, they are not really "building blocks" of any theory or philosophy. They're a simplistic, highly subjective and personal characterization of differing theories.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram