Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Texas
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:32
Registered on:9/14/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Ex Officio or Duluth Trading boxer briefs

re: A Paul-Cruz ticket

Posted by Dalymaple on 3/9/14 at 3:16 am to
The Republican's best chance is with Paul and someone like Russ Roberts
quote:

I live in Texas, but I wish somebody could tell me who the real conservatives are.

If you learn towards the tea party check out Dwayne Stovall
The problem with the current models is that they are not advanced enough to simulate the complex ocean/atmospheric dynamics and there is still a lot that we just don't know.

Coming from an engineering background I personally have serious reservations about our ability to model the earth and atmospheric system. With that being said, I think the most important question is how we address the problem of a finite fossil fuel reserve and pollution. Market solutions or government solutions?
I want to say James Buchanan but he passed away last year. Now it would have to be either Russ Roberts from econtalk or David Friedman.

Edit: Michael Huemer is up there as well - Ted Talk
quote:

No. I don't. For the last 40 years I've been reading 3 to 4 newspapers per day.
For the last 20 years I've been reading 20 internet sites per day....plus the newspapers. I don't have an archive. If you don't believe me that's your right. I don't care.

Try to make your numbers more believable next time
:rolleyes:
quote:

I think that a lot of the economic problems we are facing are directly related to fiat currency and the federal resevere but I am wondering if anyone here thinks that fiat currency is a good thing


Nothing is wrong with a fiat currency it actually economizes the use of a commodity, you can gain interest from banks issuing the currency etc. The problem comes into play when you when have a monopoly issuing the currency as opposed to competing firms.
quote:

if they really wanted to lower their incarceration costs, they could just legalize drugs.

Arrests would approach zero. And then they could get rid of the sheriff all together. Saving big $$

And people wonder why the police/private jails are in favor of strict drugs laws. Got to keep that money coming in.
quote:

Fiscal issues matter way more than minute social issues(gay marriage etc)

You cannot have economic freedom without social freedom.

With that said, the Christian right/neo-conservative movement is a joke and as long as the republicans keep pandering to them they will never will never take back the white house.

re: .

Posted by Dalymaple on 2/5/14 at 1:05 am to
quote:

What is to stop the owner of a competing private judicial system from winning a lawsuit in his own court if he is guilty of wrong doing


If I'm suing someone for violating my property rights and that said person owned an arbitration firm, why would I take my case to his court?

re: .

Posted by Dalymaple on 2/5/14 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Also how would people with little wealth have a chance in the long run being that big wealth will eventually control the society?


The wealthy already control our society. They use the arm of the state to create laws and regulations that are beneficial to them and keep their competition out of the market i.e. rent seeking.

re: .

Posted by Dalymaple on 2/5/14 at 12:02 am to
quote:

Another AnCap?

This board reinforces my views of the future.

:thup:

re: .

Posted by Dalymaple on 2/4/14 at 11:17 pm to
Recommend text for an econ class, which led me to the Machinery of Freedom. I picked up a couple books by Rothbard and Hoppe along the way but never got on the Austrian bandwagon.

re: Anyone here never voted?

Posted by Dalymaple on 2/1/14 at 2:26 pm to
Nope but I told my dad I voted for Obama for the lulz
quote:

I am sick of hearing this arguement. How about you back this up with proof on the damage it would cause?

These immigrants grease the economy – they expand the productivity of the labor market, increase the US’s comparative advantage in the market, lower prices, while at the same time increasing demand. To remove them would have far reaching consequences.
quote:

Restrict trade and cries of protectionism resound. Suggest linking labor standards to trade and it's protectionism in disguise. Limit capital flows and the International Monetary Fund is on your back. But restrict people flows? That's just an accepted exercise of national sovereignty! During the last few decades, when most countries reduced barriers to trade in goods and services and liberalized financial capital markets, most also sought to limit immigration. - Richard Freeman

A Cost - Benefit Analysis of the New Alabama Immigration Law

Daniel Griswold Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement Committee
quote:

Consider the agricultural sector, in which an estimated 800,000 to 1 million undocumented immigrants work each year to harvest American crops. Does anybody seriously believe that if we could deport every one of those workers tomorrow, that a sufficient number of American workers would line up to take their place? It’s safe to say most of those jobs would go unfilled. If wages were hiked significantly, many of those jobs would simply disappear, most likely to be replaced by imported farm goods grown and harvested in other countries. Without immigrant workers, the most likely scenario is that we would simply produce less agricultural output as a nation. This would mean not only a direct loss of manual, on-the-farm jobs but a ripple effect of job losses in upstream and downstream sectors such as management, processing, packaging, distribution, and marketing. According to estimates from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, there are 3.1 related jobs off the farm for every job on the farm. Eliminating the on-farm jobs would put at risk many more jobs paying middle-class wages and employing native-born American workers.

Does Immigration Grease the Wheels of the Labor Market?

If you're to lazy to read publications

Economic Benefits of Immigration

quote:

We should just send them all back to Mexico, secure the border and shoot any that try to cross illegally, and make them use the legal way of entering the country like everyone else



Good idea if you want to destroy the economy
quote:

I just cannot think of an effective business model for a private fire department.

It’s impossible to predict these things, but I would assume the homeowner would pay a set amount per year to a private fire fighting company and if the need ever arose they would come out to extinguish the fire.

Honestly, if you’re truly interested in how a society could function without the state and not just trolling check out David Friedman’s book – The Machinery of Freedom.


quote:

I am aware, but what is the biggest sustainable area that could be serviced by a volunteer fire department?

:banghead:

Do you even know how markets work?
quote:

There are things that should be maintained when not used. say the military, kinda fricked if you don't have one till you need it.

Next you will be asking, "Who will build the roads?"