Started By
Message

re: Gabby Giffords taken to a studio, told to talk to Congress about guns

Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by real
Dixieland
Member since Oct 2007
14027 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:15 pm to
Democrats are some confused people.bSo they would have us to get a back ground check before buying a gun. But Democrats also say a person shouldn't have to have picture ID to vote. Their conflicted I tell ya,conflicted.
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

And the guys who wrote the Constitution couldn't possibly see the consequences industrialization would have on the gun.


What consequences did industrialization have on the gun?

LC
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18185 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

The conversation about background checks is pointless. Convicted felons can't legally possess firearms, but how many violent crimes are committed by convicted felons?


End of thread.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20465 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Guns are drastically different now than they were in 1776
dumbass! does the 1st apply to your laptop?
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14486 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Guns are drastically different now than they were in 1776.


So are our means of communication. Perhaps it's time we considered some alterations to the First Amendment. It doesn't apply to television, radio, or the Internet, for example
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18185 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

Guns are drastically different now than they were in 1776. A


So are the methods of printing! Should we do awAy with freedom of the Press.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101707 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Nobody is preaching that because the government knows you have it they'll come and take it


Rack up a few unpaid parking tickets and see.
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
27381 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

In my opinion the problem is when you decide which "mental illnesse" deprive you of your right to have a gun.

And who decides this? What would happen is that sane people taking appropriate meds would lose rights to own weapons and people with issues may avoid treatment to avoid losing gun rights.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89640 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

I've never understood the big fear of universal background checks.




FFL holders are required to do background checks.

Private citizens without such licenses are under no such obligation. I've never understood the desire to regulate these transactions between presumably law-abiding citizens.

Loughner purchased his pistol at a FFL dealer, and underwent a background check. Although it is rare, it does happen.

Lanza killed his mother for her guns. Kliebold and Harris got proxies to buy their guns - even if it were "the law" that private transactions would require a background check - these would not have helped, because the transfers themselves were illegal - highly unlikely Lanza would have run a background check on himself - tipping off the authorities to his murdering his mother - likewise, the suppliers of Kliebold and Harris would not have run a background check, because they were acting illegally as well.

I've never understood the big fear of lawfully armed citizens.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89640 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Guns are drastically different now than they were in 1776.


Methods of surveillance have increased drastically. Throw out the 4th Amendment.

We have truth serum - throw out the 5th Amendment.

quote:

And the guys who wrote the Constitution couldn't possibly see the consequences industrialization would have on the gun.


They understood the danger of being unarmed under and armed, tyrannical state.

quote:

Registration wouldn't take away your right to own a gun anyways.


It is the last step before confiscation (or some extreme regulation of a handful of privileged individuals) - it is wholly inconsistent with the Second Amendment.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 11:07 pm to
The government has no business knowing who owns a gun and who doesn't.
Posted by yumahog
Independence, Missouri
Member since Jun 2012
803 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 11:30 pm to
Piers, is that you?
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
3950 posts
Posted on 1/27/14 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Gabby Giffords taken to a studio, told to talk to Congress about guns The way Kelley has exploited his wife since her injuries is absolutely sickening. How anyone can do that to their wife is beyond me.


Your words make you seem like a dumbfrick.
Posted by BassPro Millionaire
Carencro
Member since Jun 2013
99 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 1:50 am to
Where does the government derive the right to know about when I buy guns?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 2:21 am to
quote:

I've never understood the big fear of universal background checks.



what's your definition of UBC's?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51920 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 2:38 am to
quote:

What would happen is that sane people taking appropriate meds would lose rights to own weapons and people with issues may avoid treatment to avoid losing gun rights.


We can't allow anyone who has taken antidepressants to own a handgun due to the threat of them using it to shoot themselves.

THANK OF POOR SALLY WHO LOST HER FATHER TO THIS!
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:08 am to
Posted by BamaFan89
T-Town
Member since Dec 2009
19297 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Your words make you seem like a dumbfrick.


Clearly you're a very intelligent person. I like how you avoided personal attacks and instead directly addressed what I posted.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35027 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

The way Kelley has exploited his wife since her injuries is absolutely sickening. How anyone can do that to their wife is beyond me.


The closer they get to big-time power...the more intoxicated they become. Universal axiom. Power corrupts. That's why the Founders wrote the Constitution in a way that LIMITED GOVERNMENT.

But we can trust Obama/Progs.

Oh well. Live and learn. Again and again.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73488 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:29 am to
Gabby is a sock puppet.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram