- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would LSU had been able to handle the OU team tonight?
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:00 am to Datbayoubengal
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:00 am to Datbayoubengal
quote:
He has played terrible this year and his competition has been terrible yet he lit the "vaunted" Saban defense up.
Yes - he did. I guess he played good.
0
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:02 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
And they lost to Auburn, who we beat. You can use the transitive property to prove anything you want.
Maybe you can, but he brought up BAMA, so I responded. I wasn't inaccurate.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:24 am to Duzz
quote:
How do you think we would have fared?
Two things. Is Zach playing and are we going to turn the ball over five times?
If he plays and we don't give Oklahoma 21 points, I think we do ok.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:37 am to Duzz
Lol Hill would have owned them.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 4:32 am to Duzz
In NOLA? Yes. We would need Mett though.
Oklahoma is a decent team, nothing special. Stoops was outstanding tonight though. He had his team playing with reckless abandon and it paid off.
Oklahoma is a decent team, nothing special. Stoops was outstanding tonight though. He had his team playing with reckless abandon and it paid off.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 5:04 am to AirRaidTT
i think we do beat OU. Bama does not match up well with teams like that. We do.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 5:21 am to Duzz
Nah OU is better than LSU fans want to believe and Stoops is a damn good coach
Posted on 1/3/14 at 5:24 am to tduecen
I think we would have played with Mett, yes. OU was on a mission tonight and they would have been a handful for any team.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 5:32 am to Gulf Coast Tiger
Biggest difference between LSU and Alabama is Beckham and Landry, I think those 2 would have been more important than Hill. I don't think the LSU defense would have fared much better against OU tonight than Alabama though.
Really depends which LSU team shows up the one from Ole Miss, Georgia, Alabama, or Arkansas game or the one from Texas A&M, Auburn
Really depends which LSU team shows up the one from Ole Miss, Georgia, Alabama, or Arkansas game or the one from Texas A&M, Auburn
Posted on 1/3/14 at 5:52 am to tduecen
After losing Mett, it is a good thing we didn't get a more prominent bowl. AJ just wasn't up to the challenge yet. I believe one of the QBs will get there.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 5:55 am to lsuohiofan
I think next year out offense actually resembles more of the 09-12 offense with so many new starters in place. Would be a lot of ask a young QB to come out and try to lead like Mett did
Posted on 1/3/14 at 6:08 am to tduecen
Not sure how we would have matched up, but...
Maybe, OU was tired of getting dat arse beat in the dome
Maybe, OU was tired of getting dat arse beat in the dome
Posted on 1/3/14 at 6:42 am to Duzz
Nope
Posted on 1/3/14 at 6:55 am to Sports2
quote:
That was some inspired football for 60 minutes. They looked like they were on a mission.
BUT... If LSU was on a mission and was able to play the way they did against A & M??? They beat Oklahoma, even as good as Okie played last night... IMO, Bama was sluggish and didn't want to be there... Kinda like when they played Utah a few years ago.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 6:58 am to Duzz
Without ZM? No
With ZM.... No.
Their pressure would have eaten LSU alive. OU's quarterback was outstanding. On many of the deep balls he threw there was nothing the defender could do. It was OU's night.
With ZM.... No.
Their pressure would have eaten LSU alive. OU's quarterback was outstanding. On many of the deep balls he threw there was nothing the defender could do. It was OU's night.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 7:25 am to josh336
I think our defense does better as we do well against spread type teams.
Posted on 1/3/14 at 7:25 am to Capo
quote:Enough of that shite. That's an allbarn excuse for getting owned.
Jennings would have had a dry ball...
Posted on 1/3/14 at 7:30 am to Duzz
LSU would have won by 10 points. We would run at them again and again and they would break. We would dominate the time of possession. 
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:01 am to spslayto
quote:Very good point. As maligned as our defense was for so much of the year (I certainly dogged them) they acquitted for themselves quite well down the stretch and outside of giving up at Bama they did contain Auburn for the most part and shut down JFF et al. and shut down Iowa (although most SEC teams could have as well).
Not sure but LSU would have probably been more excited to be there. And LSU has shut down offenses in Auburn and A&M that Alabama couldn't. So who knows
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:33 am to otowntiger
The LSU bowl team would've had no chance against OU last night. You're delusional if you think otherwise.
Looking forward to an improved team next season though.
Looking forward to an improved team next season though.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News