- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could the Richardson trade cause a rule change?
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:43 pm
This trade fails to help the Browns be more competitive this season and is an obvious attempt to tank the season and obtain as many top draft picks as possible.
Could we see the league office step in to prevent these kind of actions?
It's bad for the NFL. There is no reason to watch another Cleveland game this season.
Could we see the league office step in to prevent these kind of actions?
It's bad for the NFL. There is no reason to watch another Cleveland game this season.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:44 pm to townhallsavoy
quote:
This trade fails to help the Browns be more competitive this season and is an obvious attempt to tank the season and obtain as many top draft picks as possible.
Could we see the league office step in to prevent these kind of actions?
It's bad for the NFL. There is no reason to watch another Cleveland game this season.
wut
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:46 pm to townhallsavoy
I have Jordan Cameron, so I'll watch. It's not like they gave up Adrian Peterson. It was a good value for Richardson. McGahee can get you 3 ypc.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:46 pm to townhallsavoy
quote:
There is no reason to watch another Cleveland game this season.
was there one in the first place?
:philosoraptor:
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:50 pm to townhallsavoy
The betting public will still watch the games simply for the point spreads.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:53 pm to townhallsavoy
Is there a rule that says you have to be competitive?
Posted on 9/18/13 at 8:55 pm to townhallsavoy
I bet you think you're both smart and cool.
Maybe even edgy.
Well, I've got news for you...
Maybe even edgy.
Well, I've got news for you...
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:01 pm to townhallsavoy
How is this different from what the Astros have been doing ?
Cleveland is putting themselves in position to build for the future. In doing so, they may be sacrificing some quality on the front end.
Cleveland is putting themselves in position to build for the future. In doing so, they may be sacrificing some quality on the front end.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
And you complain about wrong meme usage
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:05 pm to Sevendust912
quote:
Is there a rule that says you have to be competitive?
If so, wouldn't the Jags have been suspended as a franchise starting a few years ago?
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:06 pm to townhallsavoy
Richardson hasn't been the game changing back they need. They need more support. Good trade IMO.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:10 pm to OldTigahFot
quote:
Cleveland is putting themselves in position to build for the future by getting rid of a guy who just turned 22.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:12 pm to townhallsavoy
Browns will 1-4 games with or without Richardson. They get a 1st rounder now, no greater than a 3rd rounder if they trade him next offseason. Good move IMO
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:15 pm to townhallsavoy
You sound like a heavy handed fantasy football commissioner.
Posted on 9/18/13 at 9:38 pm to ohiovol
quote:
ohiovol
Good to better-than-average running backs are a dime a dozen. We're not talking about Adrian Peterson here. A first-round pick can produce a starting LT or a franchise QB who is much more valuable.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News