- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:01 pm to rocket31
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:01 pm to Matisyeezy
he was barely better than tommy rees dude. hell, golson was benched twice last year for turnover tommy.
he had upside, but far from proven commodity. pls go
he had upside, but far from proven commodity. pls go
This post was edited on 5/25/13 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:05 pm to rocket31
He was a redshirt freshman. Typically kids get better with experience, so it's not absurd to think that would have been less of a question mark for ND this season.
Again -- I'm not even saying the kid was GOOD, but he absolutely was serviceable and on the right team with the right schedule he could be a winner. We saw that last year.
Again -- I'm not even saying the kid was GOOD, but he absolutely was serviceable and on the right team with the right schedule he could be a winner. We saw that last year.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:05 pm to threeputt
quote:
The rumors are he cheated in school .. If true, he should be kicked off the team ..
Isn't that how you get ON the team at Bama?
:rimshot:
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:06 pm to RLDSC FAN
Just saw this on twitter 
@ Notre Dame
@ Notre DamePosted on 5/25/13 at 11:07 pm to Matisyeezy
Ok, now you go from "proven commodity" to "serviceable". Make up your damn mind.
Golson is a blow, for sure, but not worth this boards reaction. Geez.
Golson is a blow, for sure, but not worth this boards reaction. Geez.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:08 pm to rocket31
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive. You know what you're getting with him -- a serviceable QB. Thus, proven commodity
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:09 pm to Matisyeezy
Proven commodities dont get benched for turnover tommy dude.
Rees is not as good as golson, but he will be fine. He had to bail Golson out twice last year.
Rees is not as good as golson, but he will be fine. He had to bail Golson out twice last year.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:13 pm to rocket31
Golson did get better during the year, at least at times
but I don't see where this should be a major blow to them, I thought Rees was better anyway....Rees will likely win as many games as Golson would have this season, and Kelly has another year to develop a new QB. I'm sure this situation will attract a major QB recruit now!!
but I don't see where this should be a major blow to them, I thought Rees was better anyway....Rees will likely win as many games as Golson would have this season, and Kelly has another year to develop a new QB. I'm sure this situation will attract a major QB recruit now!!
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:13 pm to RLDSC FAN
I thought he was pretty good for a FR. If he was kicked out for cheating, then kudos to ND for having standards. Gotta respect that.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:14 pm to biglil3
I don't know what their depth chart at QB looks like. Since Jason Street got injured, do they have any other highly touted kids at the position?
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:16 pm to RLDSC FAN
Tommy Rees pain-train time?
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:18 pm to biglil3
quote:
I don't see where this should be a major blow to them, I thought Rees was better anyway....Rees will likely win as many games as Golson would have this season, and Kelly has another year to develop a new QB
Defense won the games last year. Golson was projected to improve greatly, but it was nothing more than a prediction.
quote:
'm sure this situation will attract a major QB recruit now!!
this kid LINK immediately tried to commit after the golson news, you can not make this stuff up
not sure if ND will accept his commitment thoughThis post was edited on 5/25/13 at 11:24 pm
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:18 pm to Matisyeezy
what ever happened to Voodoo Tatum?
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:18 pm to rocket31
Looking at how the ND season played out last year, it's reasonable to say that only one game that was a win would have been a loss without Golson (Pitt). And, in fact, if Golson had stayed in, it's possible that one game that was a win could have turned into a loss (Michigan). It hurts, but it's not huge. ND will rely on its D and running game again this year, just like last year.
I'm very curious to see if it's Rees or Hendrix, though. My thought heading into the year was it'd be Rees if Golson went down in the middle of the game or was out a week (like BYU last year), but a major injury would lead to Hendrix as the starter. I wouldn't be shocked if he got the nod over Rees.
I'm very curious to see if it's Rees or Hendrix, though. My thought heading into the year was it'd be Rees if Golson went down in the middle of the game or was out a week (like BYU last year), but a major injury would lead to Hendrix as the starter. I wouldn't be shocked if he got the nod over Rees.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:20 pm to RLDSC FAN
Poor Gunner Kiel. He's cursed.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:22 pm to The_Joker
quote:
what ever happened to Voodoo Tatum?
Better question: Whatever happened to JD McCoy?
After that loss to East Dillon, he fell off the fricking face of the Earth.
This post was edited on 5/25/13 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:22 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
Soooo this is interesting:
I can guarantee ol flip flopping Gunner is aware of this and is preparing himself to revoke his loyalty from his current team.
quote:
Bylaw 14.5.5.2.8, the Return to Original Institution Without Participation or With Minimal Participation Exception says that a student-athlete can play immediately after a transfer if:
The student transfers to a second four-year collegiate institution, does not compete at the second institution and does not engage in other countable athletically related activities in the involved sport at the second institution beyond a 14-consecutive-day period and returns to the original institution. The 14-consecutive-day period begins with the date on which the student-athlete first engages in any countable athletically related activity (see Bylaw 17.02.1). A student may use this exception even if he or she has an unfulfilled residence requirement at the institution from which he or she is transferring.
I can guarantee ol flip flopping Gunner is aware of this and is preparing himself to revoke his loyalty from his current team.
Posted on 5/25/13 at 11:23 pm to Buckeye Fan 19
is Rees the only scholarship QB left?
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News