Started By
Message
locked post

Age v Quality

Posted on 3/21/13 at 4:32 pm
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 4:32 pm
From Ziller's Hook today:




Yes, the team sucks. But they are expected to suck. And they are adding another lottery pick to this team.

20 teams with an average age of 27 or younger. 14 of them have a negative point differential.

6 teams 25 or younger. 5 have a negative point differential.

eta: for danman
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 5:07 pm
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1971 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 4:49 pm to
At least we aren't Charlotte. Amirite?
Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19440 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

But they are supposed to suck
That doesn't make any sense

Just being young doesn't mean you're "supposed to suck"
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66830 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:05 pm to
Has OKC above Miami in the quality range. I am not sure how he decided this.
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
6870 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:25 pm to
this time next year we will go into the season just above where houston is now. then this time next year, i predict a deadline trade that will move us close to denver. ship
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 11:26 pm
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5253 posts
Posted on 3/21/13 at 11:32 pm to
Selection bias. Teams that suck will postpone winning for younger players.

Point still stands though. I'm just saying there is no guarentee we will get older. I'm just saying if our current young guys don't pan out as they age, we'll get rid of them and stay young.
This post was edited on 3/21/13 at 11:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram