- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"The Cabin in the Woods" and the self-aware horror flick
Posted on 11/23/12 at 9:16 am
Posted on 11/23/12 at 9:16 am
I finally watched "The Cabin in the Woods" last night and I loved it.
It was funny, entertaining, scary, thought-provoking, and most importantly: original.
I've gone back and read most of the threads on here about it, and I got to thinking about how perhaps two of the best horror movies, IMO, have been very self-aware, and self-parodying ("Scream" being the other).
And that got me thinking about the process that led to the creation of those films. For "Scream," it was the staleness of the slasher genre. It had become boring and predictable, full of sequels with no redeeming value, and then out of all that, a gem like "Scream" pops out.
And that same thing kind of happened with the process leading to "The Cabin in the Woods." I don't even know how I'd best described horror of the 2000's, but the word "good" wouldn't be used. It was bland, cheesy, and made for PG-13 audiences. But then out of all that, a gem like "The Cabin in the Woods" pops out.
So the question becomes: Does the horror genre depend on this kind of a cycle? Do we need to get into a rut before we can finally break out of it? Is the rut necessary in order for a film like "The Cabin in the Woods" to be appreciated?
It was funny, entertaining, scary, thought-provoking, and most importantly: original.
I've gone back and read most of the threads on here about it, and I got to thinking about how perhaps two of the best horror movies, IMO, have been very self-aware, and self-parodying ("Scream" being the other).
And that got me thinking about the process that led to the creation of those films. For "Scream," it was the staleness of the slasher genre. It had become boring and predictable, full of sequels with no redeeming value, and then out of all that, a gem like "Scream" pops out.
And that same thing kind of happened with the process leading to "The Cabin in the Woods." I don't even know how I'd best described horror of the 2000's, but the word "good" wouldn't be used. It was bland, cheesy, and made for PG-13 audiences. But then out of all that, a gem like "The Cabin in the Woods" pops out.
So the question becomes: Does the horror genre depend on this kind of a cycle? Do we need to get into a rut before we can finally break out of it? Is the rut necessary in order for a film like "The Cabin in the Woods" to be appreciated?
Posted on 11/23/12 at 9:31 am to WikiTiger
quote:
Do we need to get into a rut before we can finally break out of it
I think this is true. There has to be a system in place before a meta-style commentary of it can exist. Same thing for it to be appreciated, people have to have become dissatisfied with the status quo.
I don't think the horror genre is dependent upon it, however. No genre does. It's just difficult to continually innovate which is why things become so formulaic.
Posted on 11/23/12 at 9:33 am to WikiTiger
I really, really enjoyed Cabin in the Woods....until the end. I get what they were trying to do and say, but I think they could have pulled everything together than the abrupt cheesy ending it did have.
SPOILER
The big hand coming through the ground was just too over the top for me. I get it was supposed to be the "gods" or audience that didn't get what they wanted, but I just didn't like the way they did it. For such a self aware, well thought out core of the movie there just had to be a better way.
SPOILER
The big hand coming through the ground was just too over the top for me. I get it was supposed to be the "gods" or audience that didn't get what they wanted, but I just didn't like the way they did it. For such a self aware, well thought out core of the movie there just had to be a better way.
This post was edited on 11/23/12 at 9:34 am
Posted on 11/23/12 at 10:29 am to WikiTiger
There are plenty of good foreign horror movies. Its the mainstream Hollywood ones that are stale.
Posted on 11/23/12 at 2:54 pm to Brosef Stalin
Cabin in the woods was dogshit.
Posted on 11/23/12 at 5:34 pm to dallastiger55
i love the little robot at the end.. it seems so happy to be killing people lol
Posted on 11/23/12 at 5:37 pm to dallastiger55
Its self-awareness turns into parody towards the end. I like it more when I thought it was heading towards a horror version of The Truman Show.
Posted on 11/23/12 at 5:45 pm to Icceytiger
quote:
i love the little robot at the end.. it seems so happy to be killing people lol
I just wish that we could have seen "Kevin."
quote:
Among the various possible monsters on the control room white board, one of them is just listed as "Kevin." Although Kevin is never seen, in the tie-in book The Cabin in the Woods: The Official Visual Companion co-writer Drew Goddard said that Kevin was meant to be "a sweet-looking guy who seemed like he might work at Best Buy--until he dismembers people."
Posted on 11/23/12 at 6:56 pm to THRILLHO
Are you frickin' kidding me? That was one of the worst movies I have ever seen....ever...Total waste of time and money....
Posted on 11/23/12 at 7:16 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
There are plenty of good foreign horror movies. Its the mainstream Hollywood ones that are stale.
I love how the movie gives a nod to this, especially Japanese horror with the school girls they're competing against.
I loved the movie. Totally refreshing and I loved the satire.
Posted on 11/23/12 at 7:18 pm to WikiTiger
quote:
So the question becomes: Does the horror genre depend on this kind of a cycle? Do we need to get into a rut before we can finally break out of it? Is the rut necessary in order for a film like "The Cabin in the Woods" to be appreciated?
Hard to say knowing that the whole context of Cabin in the Woods is satirical. Would we have it without the rut it's addressing with it's satire?
Posted on 11/23/12 at 7:25 pm to THRILLHO
Me and my buddy paused the movie on the whiteboard. There were some freaking funny arse ones.
"Angry Molesting Tree" was my favorite. Nice reference to Evil Dead.
"Angry Molesting Tree" was my favorite. Nice reference to Evil Dead.
Posted on 11/23/12 at 7:26 pm to THRILLHO
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/23/12 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 11/23/12 at 7:58 pm to THRILLHO
So Kevin was Kevin from Sin City?
Posted on 11/23/12 at 10:23 pm to WikiTiger
Just watched it too... Did not think it was scary.
Pretty shitty IMO ..., just a glorified hunger games/running man with a whole saving the earth scheme
Last house on the left... Now that shite was scary.
Pretty shitty IMO ..., just a glorified hunger games/running man with a whole saving the earth scheme
Last house on the left... Now that shite was scary.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 4:44 pm to DaBeerz
I loved it as well. I had no idea what it was about. I thought it was very clever. I could see how people may have thought it sucked if they knew what it was about and were expecting more, but I literally thought it was a cheesy horror movie and it got better and better.
Posted on 11/25/12 at 4:47 pm to DaBeerz
quote:
Did not think it was scary.
it was not supposed to be scary
Posted on 11/25/12 at 4:52 pm to Scruffy
Killer Unicorns.
How could anyone hate killer unicorns?
How could anyone hate killer unicorns?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News