- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

What about New Mexico to Big XII?
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:34 am
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:34 am
Im thinking great pick up. They have quality Basketball and Baseball. Added revenue and get Urlacher and other old football guys involved again could bring up program. Decent facilities, host bowl games, NCAA tourney games, average metro area.
This post was edited on 10/22/11 at 11:47 am
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:41 am to sms151t
sounds like a hell of a reach to me. the big 12 is scraping the barrel right now; need bodies.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:45 am to LSU GrandDad
Why is it a reach?
They're geographically in place, the metro, and decent overall program, reasons stated above. It isn't like UNM is small school that just became a name. They have money and people required to sustain a move.
They're geographically in place, the metro, and decent overall program, reasons stated above. It isn't like UNM is small school that just became a name. They have money and people required to sustain a move.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 11:49 am to sms151t
quote:
It isn't like UNM is small school that just became a name.
you're right they are still a no name
quote:
They have money and people required to sustain a move.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:02 pm to sms151t
New Mexico? They have a team? When did this happen?
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:16 pm to sms151t
Uh is light years better than tulane smu louisville nevada or any one else the b12-2-1+1-1 could possibly add but tech texas baylor and osu are scared of uh.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 12:49 pm to texmariner84
I think Coog High has to go in also. But I think UNM replaces CU
Posted on 10/22/11 at 1:00 pm to sms151t
You'd have a hard time naming a worse FBS team in America right now. They are 0-6 and 2-28 since 2009. I am not usually one to post team A against team B and team B against team C and so on, but ...
Sept 3
LSU 40 - Oregon 27
Sept 10
Oregon 69 - Nevada 20
October 15
Nevada 49 - New Mexico 7
And it isn't like they are usually good but down right now. Their last conference championship was in the WAC in 1964.
Sept 3
LSU 40 - Oregon 27
Sept 10
Oregon 69 - Nevada 20
October 15
Nevada 49 - New Mexico 7
And it isn't like they are usually good but down right now. Their last conference championship was in the WAC in 1964.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 1:26 pm to daboman of Aggieland
I'm not talking just football. UNM would be good overall add. The Big 12 needs more than football to survive right now.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 4:25 pm to sms151t
As a Missouri fan my advice to New Mexico if the Big 12 calls is to hang up.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 6:05 pm to sms151t
They have good BBall history and B12 need some non-Texas teams, even though NM has a really small population (beautiful state though).
Posted on 10/22/11 at 6:46 pm to Esarhaddon
TCU would love it
they beat New Mexico 69-0 today.
I'm just not sure NM would bring enough money into the league to offset the extra mouth.
Perhaps if the Big 12 was going to do their own network but it seems as if they aren't going to be able to make a proper one b/c of the LHN
they beat New Mexico 69-0 today.
I'm just not sure NM would bring enough money into the league to offset the extra mouth.
Perhaps if the Big 12 was going to do their own network but it seems as if they aren't going to be able to make a proper one b/c of the LHN
This post was edited on 10/22/11 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 10/22/11 at 6:57 pm to Dr RC
quote:
Perhaps if the Big 12 was going to do their own network but it seems as if they aren't going to be able to make a proper one b/c of the LHN
Part of the LHN contract is that the Whorns can't participate in a conference network. They are more important (to themselves) than any conference they might want to join.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 7:12 pm to sms151t
Santa Fe/Albq. Market on par with Austin, bigger than New Orleans, Memphis, Buffalo and many others.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 8:31 pm to Bubba Hotep
I could name a ton of better adds then the lobos.
In no specific order.
Tulsa, UH, Air Force, tulane, Memphis, Louisville, WVU, Cincy, Utep, BYU, SMU, Boise, Utah State, Colorado State just to name a few.
The only team I can think of that would be an even pick would be U. North Texas.
In no specific order.
Tulsa, UH, Air Force, tulane, Memphis, Louisville, WVU, Cincy, Utep, BYU, SMU, Boise, Utah State, Colorado State just to name a few.
The only team I can think of that would be an even pick would be U. North Texas.
Posted on 10/22/11 at 9:48 pm to daboman of Aggieland
quote:
right now
There's your issue. Locksley was a terrible hire, but they were a decent program before him--even had Albuquerque add a bowl game so they could play there every year. Top 50 media market, geographic fit, solid in 3 sports. Really, not a bad pickup, and better than any of the C-USA rejects.
Posted on 10/23/11 at 12:49 am to sms151t
They really might be a good pickup. They are solid in several sports and would give the Albuquerque and santa fe markets. New Mexico was supposed to be one of the original teams in the Big 12 back in 1996. The only reason they didn't get in was that a Baylor alum that had a lot of power over the negotiations lobbied hard to get Baylor in instead.
Posted on 10/23/11 at 1:34 pm to cbree88
The Lobos already have a "natural rival" with Tech. I really think you bring them in to get fat on for a bit. Big XII should copy SEC when they brought Carolina and Arkansas in. Not great in FB but good in others, rivalries already with a team in conference, and geographically makes sense.
Popular
Back to top

7




