Started By
Message

re: Wednesday Mark Ingram

Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:19 pm to
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

He finishes his runs. He doesn't let up. He's like a machine."
-Jon Vilma



Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279263 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:24 pm to
SFP has hated every 1st/2nd round pick since we took Reggie Bush.

iNgram, Jenkins, tracy porter, specifically.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
21010 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

tracy porter


I have noticed his hatred towards our early picks.
This post was edited on 8/10/11 at 12:38 pm
Posted by jdrumdog
baton rouge, la
Member since Jan 2010
7655 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

"Ingram isn't really the dominating big/power back that you're making him out to be. He's not a 240 lb grinder. RB is just not a value position in the league anymore."
-SFP

"FWIW, I think it cost way to much to get a guy who isn't that much better than others at his position we could have gotten in the 2nd. I agree he has a chance to be the best RB in this draft. Just don't know how MUCH better. If Ingram, Williams, and Thomas all hit their peak I don't see much difference"
-Jacks40

"You see, Ingram won't ever be the next Emmitt Smith because Dallas was a run first offense designed around Smith. There is no way Payton will ever do that. I think a lot of people are grossly over rating M Ingram because he is a SEC guy and they know him. I think he'll be a a good player. But they gave up too much to get him. Even if he is a beast, you don't know if they would or could have gotten an OLB and another RB that would have made a difference. Recent NFL history shows us that there is a glut of RB talent, there is no need to give up a high draft pick to get one."
-H-Town Tiger


Further proof that us idiots on message boards don't really know shite.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78093 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

RB is just not a value position in the league anymore

true
quote:

Ingram isn't really the dominating big/power back that you're making him out to be. He's not a 240 lb grinder

true, he is a combo back
quote:


"You see, Ingram won't ever be the next Emmitt Smith because Dallas was a run first offense designed around Smith. There is no way Payton will ever do that. I think a lot of people are grossly over rating M Ingram because he is a SEC guy and they know him. I think he'll be a a good player. But they gave up too much to get him. Even if he is a beast, you don't know if they would or could have gotten an OLB and another RB that would have made a difference. Recent NFL history shows us that there is a glut of RB talent, there is no need to give up a high draft pick to get one."

dont see anything wrong with any of that



Also, bumping comments like that should probably wait until the guy has at least played a game, dont ya think?
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11278 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 12:46 pm to
Patrick Robinson too
Posted by Dz Nutz
Houma
Member since Nov 2007
97 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:27 pm to
LINK

Mark Ingram Sports Science
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64525 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:37 pm to
Holy shite...Ingram>>>>Keiland Williams, if you get what I'm saying.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14807 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:39 pm to
Sports Science describes his power, vision, balance, cut-back abiltiy, and jumping prowess.

Saints players only confirm his power, vision, balance, and cut-back ability. However, his jumping prowess should be installed by Friday.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

But they gave up too much to get him

Next years first round pick? Yeah thats so much considering we got two huge need filling players.

That sports science vid is from 2 yrs ago isnt it?
This post was edited on 8/10/11 at 4:48 pm
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78093 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:48 pm to
we swapped next years pick for 1 huge need, not 2
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
16170 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:49 pm to
great Article - cannot wait to get his jersey for my birthday :)
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:50 pm to
What I mean was we got two first rounders this year instead of one each year.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64525 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

we swapped next years pick for 1 huge need, not 2


and we used our other 1st rounder for a DE
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37277 posts
Posted on 8/10/11 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

great Article - cannot wait to get his jersey for my birthday :)


There are plenty of crimson 22 jerseys out there.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33779 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 12:49 am to
quote:

He averaged over 19 carries in 2009. In 2010, he had another future first round beast Trent Richardson to help carry the load.


Well Richardson was also there in 2009. Richardson had only had 14 fewer carries in '09 compared to 2010. Ingram would have had better stats in 2010 if not for a minor knee operation at the start of the season. He missed the first 2 games and still lead the rushing attack with 158 carries for 875 yards and 13 TD.
This post was edited on 8/11/11 at 12:55 am
Posted by Suck Out West
Phoenix, AZ
Member since Dec 2006
5932 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Any Saints fan will tell you they have hated the Falcons since birth...

FIFY
Posted by jdrumdog
baton rouge, la
Member since Jan 2010
7655 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 7:23 am to
quote:

and we used our other 1st rounder for a DE


yup. people like josh just don't quite get it. I'd stay tuned to the preseason game.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424836 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 7:53 am to
quote:

"Ingram isn't really the dominating big/power back that you're making him out to be. He's not a 240 lb grinder. RB is just not a value position in the league anymore."
-SFP


nothing i said was incorrect

i don't hate the pick, but we gave up a lot. he better be really good, really quickly
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424836 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 7:55 am to
quote:

iNgram, Jenkins, tracy porter, specifically.

i didn't hate ingram. i just think we gave up a TON for a position that isn't valuable

jenkins failed at CB like i said he would. all i did was point out that he wasn't going to be a good CB, and saintards flipped out and tried to tell me 4.55 speed was fine at man CB

i was wrong about porter
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram