- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC Expansion Rumor
Posted on 6/4/10 at 7:19 pm to DixieTiger88
Posted on 6/4/10 at 7:19 pm to DixieTiger88
I can't imagine UK liking this.
0
Posted on 6/5/10 at 12:20 pm to ottothewise
quote:dont forget field hockey
baseball and ice hockey.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 12:55 pm to DixieTiger88
Texas & Texas A&M
I heard it was
Auburn
Alabama
Ole Miss
Arkansas
Miss State
LSU
yo Momma
& yo Auntee
but thats just me ask the expansion board
I heard it was
Auburn
Alabama
Ole Miss
Arkansas
Miss State
LSU
yo Momma
& yo Auntee
but thats just me ask the expansion board
Posted on 6/5/10 at 12:57 pm to Tiger79
I'm sorry
LSU
yo Grandma
followed by Texas
my bad I want to get that list absolutely correct!
LSU
yo Grandma
followed by Texas
my bad I want to get that list absolutely correct!
Posted on 6/5/10 at 12:57 pm to DixieTiger88
I am against expansion. Going beyond 12 teams for any conference is not a good idea.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 12:59 pm to DixieTiger88
quote:unlikely
Texas,
quote:maybe
Texas A&M
quote:too far north
North Carolina
quote:doubt it
Florida St.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:00 pm to Tiger_n_ATL
quote:
North Carolina
too far north
Umm, Kentucky is further north.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:12 pm to los angeles tiger
on college football now yesterday the story was that the PAC 10 was fully ready to offer Texas, A&M, Oklahomo, Okla. St. , Texas Tech, and Colorado spots in the pac 10, making it a 16 team super conference....
One of the writers from Austin was breaking it down, that Texas has no interest in the SEC, (for obvious reasons, why go from a perennial power to possibly a 2 loss team every year) and has no interest in being the southern boundary of the big 10...fwiw.
One of the writers from Austin was breaking it down, that Texas has no interest in the SEC, (for obvious reasons, why go from a perennial power to possibly a 2 loss team every year) and has no interest in being the southern boundary of the big 10...fwiw.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:15 pm to kdubssrightcalf
You know, when I think of Texas I think of the Pacific Coast. 
I don't understand this need to go to super-super conference size. It will end up not being a great strategy.
I don't understand this need to go to super-super conference size. It will end up not being a great strategy.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:24 pm to broussardtige
quote:
o way they give up rivalries like Texas/Oklahoma or North Carolina/Duke
A teams can have rivalries out of conference (see FSU-Fla) B Texas and OU have only been in the same conference since 1996, but have played for over 70 years.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:29 pm to los angeles tiger
quote:
when I think of Texas I think of the Pacific Coast
so change the name, it would basically be the Big 12 S (with CU instead of Baylor) + Arizona. with the original Pac 8 in another division.
quote:
I don't understand this need to go to super-super conference size.
$$$$$
The Pac 16 would make way more revenue get better TV exposure than either the Pac 10 or Big 12 can get on their own.
This post was edited on 6/5/10 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:30 pm to DixieTiger88
quote:
Texas, Texas A&M, North Carolina and Florida St.
This would be awesome. I would like to get some revenge for losing to Texas A&M 6 years in a row during the time I was at LSU. Glad we ended that series but ready to get it going again!!
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:31 pm to kdubssrightcalf
quote:
Texas has no interest in the SEC, (for obvious reasons, why go from a perennial power to possibly a 2 loss team every year)
If you actually believe that this is a reason Texas would not want to join the SEC. I'd love to talk to you about buying this bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:32 pm to H-Town Tiger
Unlikely, but the conference would be absolutely disgusting in baseball if you added those 4 teams.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:33 pm to DixieTiger88
quote:
Texas, Texas A&M, North Carolina and Florida St.
Would be my dream 4. No doubt, but I only see two of those as a real possibility.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:33 pm to tigafan89
quote:
I would like to get some revenge for losing to Texas A&M 6 years in a row
it was 5. We beat them 4 of 5, then they won 6 strait.
quote:
Glad we ended that series
I was pissed, it was a great series, plus it ended when we started to get good again.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Would be my dream 4. No doubt, but I only see two of those as a real possibility.
yeah, I couldn't imagine UNC leaving the ACC. I could see Texas coming if the $ was right, despite what the rantards say, but I don't think would be likely.
A&M and FSU should have joined in 92
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:44 pm to DixieTiger88
no
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:48 pm to weezy f tigers
I heard Nicholls, BRCC, ITI Technical Institute, and Crescent City Bartending School.
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:06 pm to lsutigers1992
According to what I read in the Dallas paper a few days ago, Texas has told the Big Ten that in order for any discussions on them coming there, A&M and Tech most also be included. Demanded by the powers that be in the Texas legislature. Also, they have required that their traditional game with Oklahoma not be messed with either.
PAC-10 also courting them as well.
PAC-10 also courting them as well.
This post was edited on 6/5/10 at 2:07 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News