Started By
Message

re: Realistic=Optimistic

Posted on 2/2/10 at 9:20 am to
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 9:20 am to
quote:

well if you want to accept mediocrity then fine


The worn out tagline of an idiot.
Posted by G4LSU
Member since Jan 2009
2411 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 9:22 am to
its a solid class at best.


we came in with 3 real big needs. DT/RB/WR. RB is a satisfied need assuming both Gore and Blue get to school which isnt 100% at this point, but at WR and DT we are on our 4th and 5th options. good news is next year is loaded instate at those positions and that makes the 2010 football season the most significant since this run started.
Posted by CalTiger
California
Member since Jan 2004
3997 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 9:40 am to
quote:

I would love to believe you are right. What we have and what we have coming is the next football season. Recruits, no matter how many stars they do or don't carry, are only as good as they will be coached to be. Time will tell.


(Reply not directed specifically at JawjaTigah)

This is an awesome quote - Miles is a doofus who won with Saban's recruits - but all recruits need to be coached to win - So which one is it?

Did the recruits win in 2007 - in which case Miles is doing fine by bringing in great classes.

Did the coaching win in 2007 - in which case , regardless of a couple of down years (relatively not absolutely), he is still our coach and can recruit as well.
Posted by ShoNuff
coushatta
Member since Jan 2010
105 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 10:10 am to
Reality says we are far from OK on offense.
Posted by CalTiger
California
Member since Jan 2004
3997 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Reality says we are far from OK on offense.


Reality IS that we didn't click on offense last year.

We have hired new coaches on the offense - have an experienced QB and no one knows WTF is going to happen this year - and I choose to be optimistic.
This post was edited on 2/2/10 at 10:40 am
Posted by ShoNuff
coushatta
Member since Jan 2010
105 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 10:49 am to
We didn't click? I believe our offensive woes were a little deeper and more complex than that. I would give more credit to a shitty offensive line, no running game, and an erratic QB, which the last two can be attributed to the shitty offensive line play. Being ranked 112th in the nation in offense doesn't equate to not being able to "click." Good try though.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 10:52 am to
quote:


This is an awesome quote - Miles is a doofus who won with Saban's recruits - but all recruits need to be coached to win - So which one is it?

Did the recruits win in 2007 - in which case Miles is doing fine by bringing in great classes.

Did the coaching win in 2007 - in which case , regardless of a couple of down years (relatively not absolutely), he is still our coach and can recruit as well.


+1, please bring this to the rant.
Posted by PHXTigers
Arizona
Member since Dec 2007
776 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 10:58 am to
quote:

the last two can be attributed to the shitty offensive line play


Could the "Shitty" OL result from "Jack of all trades and master of none" syndrome?

The offense was power I,option, spread, pistol, meerkat and what others we had. I would think that most involved different blocking schemes. Just a guess.
Posted by ShoNuff
coushatta
Member since Jan 2010
105 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 11:06 am to
Good point, IDK. But that comes down to coaching and the guy making those decisions is still in charge. I have all the confidence in the world that the defense will be OK and good enough for a BCS game, but not the same confidence in the offense. With what we have coming back offensively and who's coaching them up we have a 7 win offense with a 11 win defense.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93771 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 11:07 am to
quote:

don't mind him, it's a day before NSD and he has a proverbial anal itch that has turned his meter way off. Him and Luke are walking around the recruiting board similar to that of Godzilla wrecking Hiroshima right after the A bomb reconstruction. Mildly, they are a little antsy.


watch your tone, woman.
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 11:17 am to
quote:

watch your tone, woman.


I'm sorry. Is your sarcasm meter on or off at this point?
Posted by jimmyd
jacksonville , fl.
Member since Jul 2009
456 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 11:34 am to
Optimism
Posted by Linkovich
crater lake
Member since Feb 2007
9541 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Optimism


You're out of your element Donnie.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22506 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Miles is a doofus who won with Saban's recruits - but all recruits need to be coached to win - So which one is it?

Did the recruits win in 2007 - in which case Miles is doing fine by bringing in great classes.

Did the coaching win in 2007 - in which case , regardless of a couple of down years (relatively not absolutely), he is still our coach and can recruit as well.
This is my thinking: Yes and no, to all of the above. Somewhere between when Saban left and Miles took over and today some things have changed.

First, all new coaches inherit a coaching "culture" from their predecessor. Miles did. Saban did. Dinardo did. Etc.

Second, Miles benefited from the Saban culture and the team which was coached by Saban/Miles looked good for a couple of years.

Third, in the Miles MNC year (07), the team actually began having some mild issues that translated into key losses - esp. the UK loss. I attribute that to the change in balance of the Saban culture. It was being outweighed by the Miles culture, and the loss of team focus and discipline was beginning to surface, if just slightly.

Fourth, a combination of bad hiring (Malveto) and further erosion of the Saban culture led to the emergence of the real Miles coaching culture at LSU. We saw blunders, defensive failure, lack of proper use of talent, clock management issues, and a retrenchment of Miles' former freedom to be a free-wheeling gambler (He didn't have confidence in the players? What reason? No focus?)

Fifth, I present seasons 2008 and 09 as the emerging trend at LSU.

Sixth, I will be the first cheer if CLM can overcome his own coaching style and begin moving back to the focused, disciplined, dominating LSU teams that are truly competing for championships and not just having a "want" to compete on that level.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 12:23 pm to
I think it speaks volumes about the state of the program when we can consider a top 10 class disappointing. This is a better than OK class. (OK would be somewhere between 15-25.) It's a reasonably good class with, perhaps, a couple of holes that we would have liked to fill. If this class ends up sandwiched in between a VERY good class (last year) and potentially an outstanding class next year, we'll be fine.
This post was edited on 2/2/10 at 6:14 pm
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22506 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

consider a top 10 class disappointing.
What I consider disappointing is the way LSU played for the last two years in a row. Recruiting rankings are just dreams. What counts is what happens on the field. LSU has looked increasingly lost, like the whole team fabric is unraveling, right before our very eyes. The Tigers looked like their old dominant selves a total of one whole game last season, versus Auburn. Otherwise, it just came and went in flashes.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 6:19 pm to
What I consider disappointing is the way LSU played for the last two years in a row. Recruiting rankings are just dreams. What counts is what happens on the field. LSU has looked increasingly lost, like the whole team fabric is unraveling, right before our very eyes. The Tigers looked like their old dominant selves a total of one whole game last season, versus Auburn. Otherwise, it just came and went in flashes.
_____________________

I wouldn't say that recruiting rankings are totally immaterial: they do say a lot about the overall talent level of a team and the health of a program. But your point is well taken. Ultimately what matters is how the talent translates to the field. I agree that the last two seasons have been disappointing. At this point, however, I still look on them as an inevitable down period in the wake of the Perrilloux mess and the loss of Pellini. The next year or two will tell whether that is the case or if there are deeper problems.
Posted by JawjaTigah
Bizarro World
Member since Sep 2003
22506 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

I still look on them as an inevitable down period in the wake of the Perrilloux mess and the loss of Pellini. The next year or two will tell whether that is the case or if there are deeper problems.

I can respect your opinion, even though I don't share agreement on the Perriloux thing. Yes it was a fiasco, but I just don't see giving him that much credit. Was he the whole LSU team? No. Was his departure in mid-season? No. Was there time to develop readiness on the part of JL or JJ? Yes. I just see the bulk of the problem in a coaching failure to develop young QBs, admittedly earlier than originally planned. But this stuff happens to teams and they adjust. LSU didn't. That's coaching, IMO. And so I am not really optimistic that CLM & CO. have what it takes to develop any of the talent on any of the hi-ranked recruiting classes to the extent that said talent could be developed. Case in point: RS this past season.
Posted by jimmyd
jacksonville , fl.
Member since Jul 2009
456 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 8:02 pm to
All the negativity. Its getting old. We had a down year. Thats it. We are loaded, and will continue to be loaded. Gonzo is here as an OC don't let anyone tell you different. This is a smooth transition taking place. No matter what i think Gonzo was hired with the idea of him taking over soon. Being brought on as recruiting coordinator and an assistant HC should say a lot. Smart move by LM. This way nobody gets their feathers ruffled next year.
Posted by TigerCard
Cleveland, OH
Member since Nov 2009
894 posts
Posted on 2/2/10 at 8:17 pm to
Gonzo is here as an OC don't let anyone tell you different. This is a smooth transition taking place. No matter what i think Gonzo was hired with the idea of him taking over soon. Being brought on as recruiting coordinator and an assistant HC should say a lot. Smart move by LM. This way nobody gets their feathers ruffled next year.
______________________

Interesting take on the situation. I've had similar thoughts myself, although I haven't thought it through as thoroughly as you. it would make sense with the way Miles operates, though. He was very sensitive in the way he handled the DC situation last year. He didn't fire anyone...he quietly made sure both coaches had other "offers". They accepted those offers and then he brought in Chavis. Smooth...and no public embarrassement to either of the previous co-DCs. If things don't go well with Crowton this year, I would expect something similar.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram