- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/10/09 at 5:14 pm to BamaTruth
Here's the difference: I don't remember that game or that play ... what was the final score in that game ... wasn't it 28-14?
But here's the difference -- that was a non-call by an on-field official ... not reviewable. Perhaps a poor exercise of officiating subjective judgment, but, nevertheless, a "bang bang" play. On this past Sat., you had a replay official sitting in a booth w/ all the time in the world to see what was clearly an interception, and make the right call. Rather than do that, he made the conscious, deliberate decision to IGNORE what was plainly in front of his face, for whatever reason: agenda? Gutlessness? Alabama bias? I mean, yeah, that all sounds like Oliver Stone conspiracy nonsense, but .... what other explanation is there?
But here's the difference -- that was a non-call by an on-field official ... not reviewable. Perhaps a poor exercise of officiating subjective judgment, but, nevertheless, a "bang bang" play. On this past Sat., you had a replay official sitting in a booth w/ all the time in the world to see what was clearly an interception, and make the right call. Rather than do that, he made the conscious, deliberate decision to IGNORE what was plainly in front of his face, for whatever reason: agenda? Gutlessness? Alabama bias? I mean, yeah, that all sounds like Oliver Stone conspiracy nonsense, but .... what other explanation is there?
Posted on 11/10/09 at 5:26 pm to MightyYat
quote:that's the view that DECIDED the overturned call, nimrod.
nice photo. but that view wasn't available on replay
Posted on 11/10/09 at 5:52 pm to BamaTruth
A fellow realist 
This post was edited on 11/10/09 at 5:52 pm
Posted on 11/10/09 at 5:57 pm to BamaTruth
Nice post but what about the other 4 or 5 calls that benefited Alabama in this game? Seemed like every call and non-call went only one way in this game. A little too much to call it just poor refereeing of this game. The word "shafted" that you used in your post is appropriate. A few well placed calls are all it takes to make a close game a win for one side. That seems to be what happened this past weekend.
Posted on 11/10/09 at 5:58 pm to BamaTruth
Nice post
Posted on 11/10/09 at 5:58 pm to BamaTruth
What about in 1977 when one of my dad's sperm cells clipped another sperm cell and got to the endzone and there was no flag thrown? Damn get a freakin life.
Posted on 11/10/09 at 8:13 pm to BamaTruth
quote:
original broadcast on tape
which game? the last one. if so I watched it again it it is still an int.
Posted on 11/10/09 at 8:16 pm to BamaTruth
LSU was going to win that game anyway.
Posted on 11/10/09 at 9:03 pm to BamaTruth
quote:
nice photo. but that view wasn't available on replay. But still, its about a larger point
Actually I remember that play... You did have a view where you could see the ball hit the ground. I was all pissed off because even though you could see it was clearly not a catch, I was sure the refs were going to give it to Bama anyway...
Posted on 11/10/09 at 9:07 pm to BamaTruth
Good post. Truth. See you next year, gump.
Posted on 11/10/09 at 9:10 pm to H-Town Tiger
PP play was a pick, it was bad call, it did not alter the outcome of the game.
______________________________________________
And you know this as a fact how?
Your as retarded as little Nicky. Anything can happen in football.
Was it over when Georgia scored to go ahead of us?
Was it over when Miss St. had it on the half foot line 1st and Goal?
I could go on and on..You never know what would have happened, cause it did not play out.
______________________________________________
And you know this as a fact how?
Your as retarded as little Nicky. Anything can happen in football.
Was it over when Georgia scored to go ahead of us?
Was it over when Miss St. had it on the half foot line 1st and Goal?
I could go on and on..You never know what would have happened, cause it did not play out.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 4:19 am to BamaTruth
quote:
nice photo. but that view wasn't available on replay.
How do you know that?
quote:
But still, its about a larger point
It's a terrible example of your larger point. It was NOT a catch. The picture is as clear as day. It's as clear as PP's play that was in fact a catch.
The non-PI call I'll give you, but that drop is a terrible example to prove your "larger point."
Posted on 11/11/09 at 5:49 am to BamaTruth
hey bama truth, if you actually watched the game there were 6 or 7 bad calls not one dude. bad spots? spearing? facemasks not called? INT not called? should i continue? are you that naive?
LSU gets screwed
and again
and yet again
I do not have videos of the block in the back or the defensive pass interference on Peterson on the 2 point conversion try. However the pictures are out there. Also the pics of the bad spot on the 4th and 6 after the running into the kicker penalty on LSU. Are sec officials that corrupt and dumb? i think so. A 5.5 yard penalty? YEP. Pathetic.
LSU gets screwed
and again
and yet again
I do not have videos of the block in the back or the defensive pass interference on Peterson on the 2 point conversion try. However the pictures are out there. Also the pics of the bad spot on the 4th and 6 after the running into the kicker penalty on LSU. Are sec officials that corrupt and dumb? i think so. A 5.5 yard penalty? YEP. Pathetic.
This post was edited on 11/11/09 at 5:51 am
Posted on 11/11/09 at 6:07 am to BamaTruth
quote:
BamaTruth
I will give you kudos for admitting the wrong call was made and that there was the possibility of us going down the field and scoring. All the other gumps say it was not an interception and we wouldn't have scored anyways!
Posted on 11/11/09 at 6:10 am to BamaTruth
quote:No that is not the point.
The point is, you play this game long enough, you'll get shafted by the refs. Guaranteed. You got your shaft three days ago. We got ours before that. We lived with it. Now you get to. On one shallow level, I'm empathetic, but not sympathetic. Tough luck. No apology offered.
Here's the point (as I told you on your board):
Subsequent to every instance of blown SEC officiating your attitude seems to be the attitude of the beneficiary of the bad call. It's silly, shortsighted, and counterproductive. The LSU game is done. Bama won. Bama would likely have won had the play been called appropriately. The call was unfortunate for both teams. Apologies, empathy, sympathy, explanations, and/or excuses will not change the fact that LSU got cheated and Bama's win tainted by incompetent officiating.
The SEC is far and away the top football conference in the NCAA. Money is rolling in. The SEC is awash in it. Major league money is also changing hands over these games in Vegas. Avoidable officiating ineptitude under such circumstances is flatly inexcusable. Yet that's exactly what we have. It may not be corrupt, but it's at the very least an invitation for corruption, and that needs to change.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 7:46 am to BamaTruth
I don't know. Our BU QB took it 59 yrs and scored with a backup RB on that great Saban D. Why not 68, it's only 9 yards more? I think MO would have been on our side after the INT. I wish I could have had the opportunity to see it happen.
The way I see it, my argument has as much proof as yours.
The way I see it, my argument has as much proof as yours.
Posted on 11/11/09 at 7:51 am to BamaTruth
BamaTruth you just got owned and lost credibility. Thanks for posting now leave for good.
Signed,
MightyYat
Signed,
MightyYat
Posted on 11/11/09 at 8:47 am to MightyYat
quote:Knew that was coming!
MightyYat
Fast work!Posted on 11/11/09 at 8:14 pm to TigerWoody
lsu fan says reviewers had to let call stand ..article 3 - too close to call no irrefutable evidence
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News