Started By
Message
locked post

Charles Scott or Keiland Williams

Posted on 4/16/09 at 7:22 am
Posted by ETownTiger
Member since Apr 2009
136 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 7:22 am
Which of these guys do you think will have the starting job at RB by fall
Posted by beardedzeus
NOLA
Member since Mar 2006
4474 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 7:35 am to
Scott
Posted by bringonusc
Katy, TX
Member since Aug 2007
3787 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 7:37 am to
Is this a serious question?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 7:47 am to
miles likes powers backs and i-formation, up the gut running, which scott fits...so scott
Posted by Clyde Tipton
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2007
40524 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:14 am to
At least it isn't JJ vs JL...

Oh... and Scott.
Posted by Durrell
Member since Jan 2009
613 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:15 am to
both
Posted by mikedatyger
Orlandeaux, FL
Member since Jun 2005
4325 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Which of these guys do you think will have the starting job at RB by fall


Which ever one wants it more?
Don't care, just want someone who will bust his arse for the Tigers.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17316 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:18 am to
Who starts at left tackle, Ciron Black or Thomas Parsons?
Posted by Jaydeaux
Covington
Member since May 2005
19533 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:20 am to
Les likes guys that bring it every snap, so Scott
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135385 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:20 am to
quote:

miles likes powers backs and i-formation, up the gut running, which scott fits...so scott
True.

I don't know what happened to KW last year. He looked slow, tenative, very JustinVincent-like. IMO this Saturday will tell a lot. If KW plays to capacity, I'll go on a limb and pick him as the starter. In any situation though, barring injury, it will be a shared role.
Posted by CalLSU
Shreveport, la
Member since Feb 2009
911 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 8:30 am to
either one IMO will be great. having 2 really good running backs that bring 2 different looks is always a good thing. It kind of reminds me, not that we are in the same league as the giants, but what the giants do with their 2 backs, they use one for grinding the other team down and then the other to just blow by them in the latter parts of the 3rd and 4th quarter
Posted by tiger band trumpet
Member since Sep 2008
5675 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:34 am to
Richard Murphy

















jk, Scott
Posted by LSUandSaints
New Iberia
Member since Nov 2008
1728 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Keiland Williams


I like Keiland because you can do a lot with him. He can run up the middle, Catch a screen, and block.

I think of Scott just a powerful runner. not one to catch screens.

Posted by lsufan9193969700
Madisonville
Member since Sep 2003
55839 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:42 am to
Scott

If you would have asked me this question at the beginning of last season, my answer would have been different. After what Scott did last season, I think this question is not legit.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:44 am to
here's the real question (since it's all but certain scott starts and is our #1 guy)

if scott hits the wall again this upcoming year, do we play keiland more like we should have last year?
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62019 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I like Keiland because you can do a lot with him. He can run up the middle



Posted by lsu xman
Member since Oct 2006
16686 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:55 am to
Scott really didnt even have that many carries last yr up into the Bama game, but it sure was obviously he slowed down. KW should get 10 carries minimum every game IMO.

Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4113 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:56 am to
How this plays out has more to do with the FB position than them. If we got a reliable FB, then Scott. But if Scott is needed at FB, KW may appear to be the starter.
Posted by Greg
Member since Aug 2005
218 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:57 am to
Charles Scott.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465347 posts
Posted on 4/16/09 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Scott really didnt even have that many carries last yr up into the Bama game

yeah he was on a short leash early

i think part of that was running up the score worries and part to save him

the "saving him" part didn't really play out, b/c he wore down. there were other problems, however. we pretty much shut down our offense after bama and that just hurt everyone
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram