- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A Democrat holdover inside the DOJ was obstructing the John Brennan perjury prosecution
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:18 am
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:18 am
14
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:20 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
They’re like roaches, they’re everywhere and infested
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:21 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
SFPs dumbass thought it was because there was no case.
And day. Another L. What a loser
And day. Another L. What a loser
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:22 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The entirely predictable if not inevitable outcome to not cleaning out a department that had been politicized for a generation.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:22 am to DawgCountry
He’s inside the system now. So he believes in the system. You can go back and see the switch if you know what to look for.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:26 am to Padme
They are just as disgusting and you know hate when the lights are on
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:28 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Now, hopefully they will prosecute her for obstruction of justice also.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
As noted before, about 90% of federal bureaucrats voted for Biden and then Kamala. Many are activists.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:35 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
All they had was perjury?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:36 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
And John Thune.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 8:38 am to tide06
quote:
The entirely predictable if not inevitable outcome to not cleaning out a department that had been politicized for a generation.
Dhillion who was in charge of Civil Rights cleared out the division as did Pirro for the DC office. Both are VERY understaffed and tough to get their initiatives....well initiated.
If a lawyer takes a job with them, they know they will immediately be fired if the Dems take over, and the liberal lawfare establishment will make it difficult to return to the private sector.
And cleaning house is not as easy as you think, its the Eddie Haskell's (like this chick) that are tough to root out. They smile fck you. Smile to your face and fck you behind your back.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:01 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I guess my initial reaction is how in the world was a “Dem holdover” assigned to be running the prosecution in the first place?
It’s not as if there had not already been some long running concerns and discussions about “activists” embedded within these various institutions.
Seems there should’ve been more emphasis on vetting at the outset.
It’s not as if there had not already been some long running concerns and discussions about “activists” embedded within these various institutions.
Seems there should’ve been more emphasis on vetting at the outset.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:04 am to DawgCountry
quote:
SFPs dumbass thought it was because there was no case.
I never said that. Why lie?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:07 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Color me frickin shocked. It’s blows my mind Trump gets anything done in this cess pool
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:08 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
I guess my initial reaction is how in the world was a “Dem holdover” assigned to be running the prosecution in the first place?
It’s not as if there had not already been some long running concerns and discussions about “activists” embedded within these various institutions.
Seems there should’ve been more emphasis on vetting at the outset.
Or she wasn't a "DEM holdover" and this is just a contrived talking point for MAGA content creators to have NPCs repeat it.
What gives some support that the AUSA in question isn't being biased is the previous history of these very prosecutions. Other AUSAs have gotten heat from the admin (and, vicariously, the larger MAGA universe) for giving warnings about these prosecutions only to be proven right in time.
It would not be shockign if this turned out just the same.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:14 am to SlowFlowPro
Your argument would be more convincing if you had applied it to the government backed prosecutions of Trump.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:19 am to trinidadtiger
There was an entire plan with qualified candidates prepared to repopulate the government with private sector people who didn’t want or care to continue in government once the democrats took over again and it was rejected by the WH so I just don’t have much sympathy on that front.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SFPs dumbass thought it was because there was no case.
I never said that. Why lie?
This you?
How about this?
As usual, you are lying.
This post was edited on 4/18/26 at 9:30 am
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I never said that. Why lie?
SFP is wrong, again
If the case was weak and they're pushing a sped up timeline on a weak case, they should probably listen to her.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:29 am to AlterEd
quote:
As usual, you are lying.
With attorneys, expect attorneyism.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News