- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Democrat holdover inside the DOJ was obstructing the John Brennan perjury prosecution
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Charge her with obstruction. Until the filth is held accountable and goes to jail nothing with change.
They know they are untouchable.
They know they are untouchable.
0
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:32 am to G2160
quote:
With attorneys, expect attorneyism.
The so-called "attorneys" that post here are among the most dishonest people I've ever encountered. SFP being chief among them. He lies as easily as you or I breathe. He does it constantly and when called out he just doubles down on it knowing people aren't going to waste their time going through his half a million posts to point out his lies. But this time he lied about what he had said only about 12 hours ago, so finding it wasn't hard.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:36 am to Padme
quote:
They’re like roaches, they’re everywhere and infested
The left will always seek governwmnt which is why they will always control government bureaucracy, even when the right is “in charge”.
I don’t think we can do anything about it at this point and it’s a large reason why this country will fail sooner than people think.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 9:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Bondi definitely knew this. Smfh
I hope they check this chicks bank accts to see if she was getting paid off too.
I hope they check this chicks bank accts to see if she was getting paid off too.
This post was edited on 4/18/26 at 9:58 am
Posted on 4/18/26 at 10:03 am to AlterEd
Do you know what "if" means?
Posted on 4/18/26 at 10:06 am to SlowFlowPro
When someone says, "good. She should be removed" and you respond to that with "if the case was weak", everyone can plainly see you are saying the case was weak. It was your rebuttal to someone saying she should be removed.
You lied. We all see it. Don't stack more lies on top of it.
You lied. We all see it. Don't stack more lies on top of it.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 10:09 am to the808bass
quote:
Your argument would be more convincing if you had applied it to the government backed prosecutions of Trump.
Whatever faults those had, most of these appear weaker cases.
There is probably a viable case in DC for perjury for Brennan. That's not a guaranteed win but it would be viable. In Florida? Much less viable.
This admin is continuing to try to hit home runs when singles and doubles are readily available. It's bitten them constantly since January 2025 and continues to this day.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 10:12 am to AlterEd
quote:
When someone says, "good. She should be removed" and you respond to that with "if the case was weak", everyone can plainly see you are saying the case was weak
But I never did, You're just making shite up.
If makes it a conditional scenario which is not a declarative statement.
To spin that requires complete dishonesty.
quote:
It was your rebuttal to someone saying she should be removed.
Yes and we learned with the DC cases, sometimes the appointees should listen to the rank and file giving objective analysis.
Now, we don't know 100% yet if that's the case here, hence, "if".
Posted on 4/18/26 at 10:12 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
of course
Posted on 4/18/26 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is probably a viable case in DC for perjury for Brennan. That's not a guaranteed win but it would be viable. In Florida? Much less viable.
I'll challenge this statement
When considering the jury pool to select from of these two locations, I'd consider Florida more viable for an honest and fair jury.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:15 am to SlowFlowPro
The goal is probably harassment more than legal wins. I support it.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:18 am to G2160
quote:
With attorneys, expect attorneyism.
Present-day attorneys are sophists. In fairness, it’s one of the dominant characteristics of the profession.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:19 am to trinidadtiger
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:20 am to cadillacattack
quote:
And cleaning house is not as easy as you think, its the Eddie Haskell's (like this chick) that are tough to root out. They smile fck you. Smile to your face and fck you behind your back.
This is DC in a nutshell
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:25 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Of course. Deep State doing deep state things.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:26 am to AlterEd
Well done sir.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:SFPs dumbass thought it was because there was no case. I never said that. Why lie?
You’re really going to act like you never said or at least implied that there was no case against Brennan? Seriously? Or pretty much anyone the Trump admin and the DOJ has gone after. They are all innocent and no legitimate case against them, according to you.
frick off.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:31 am to AlterEd
quote:
As usual, you are lying
Glad I wasn’t the only one who recalled these comments from TDSFP.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
Dude you were just busted straight up lying. Don’t try and talk your way out of it and try to convince yourself you’re “right.” You are not… and you’re a liar.
Posted on 4/18/26 at 11:37 am to JCdawg
quote:
All they had was perjury?
Seditious conspiracy if it has been on-going would be nice.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News