- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Yahoo! News: ‘Thank you, Mr. Tariff!’: The US just posted a massive 55% deficit cut
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:04 pm
According to the latest U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services report from the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the goods and services deficit for January and February 2026 fell by $136.1 billion, or 54.8%, compared to the same period in 2025 (2).
A trade deficit occurs when a country imports more than it exports — and the U.S. has carried a massive trade deficit for decades.
The sharp narrowing in the first two months of the year was driven by a $62.6 billion (11.3%) year-over-year increase in exports, alongside a $73.5 billion (9.2%) decline in imports.
Tariffs are designed to discourage imports and reshape trade flows, so the trend isn't entirely unexpected.
But the comparison comes with important context.
The baseline period — early 2025 — coincided with a surge in imports, as firms rushed to bring in goods ahead of anticipated tariff announcements, potentially making the year-over-year drop appear more dramatic.
And on a sequential basis, the trend looks less clear-cut.
In February, the goods and services deficit widened by 4.9% from January to $57.3 billion. Exports rose 4.2% month over month to $314.8 billion, but imports increased slightly more — up 4.3% to $372.1 billion.
On one hand, they can protect domestic industries by making imported goods more expensive, giving local manufacturers a competitive edge. On the other hand, higher tariffs may result in increased costs for consumers, as companies pass on the extra expenses. This can lead to inflation, eroding household purchasing power and raising the cost of living.
There are also concerns that tariffs could draw retaliation from trading partners. But after October 2025 data showed America's trade deficit falling to its lowest level since 2009, some economists struck a more upbeat tone (3).
"The U.S. appears to be winning the trade war with tariffs curbing the imports of foreign goods, but America's trading partners are not holding any grudge as they continue to buy more American goods and services," said Chris Rupkey, chief economist at Fwdbonds.
Tariffs can also generate significant revenue for the federal government. According to the Brookings Institution, tariff revenue surged to $264 billion in 2025 — more than triple the amount in 2024 (4).
Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of returning some of that money to Americans in the form of a "tariff dividend," though the concept has yet to materialize.
And policy is still evolving. After scaling back sweeping tariffs to a 10% blanket rate — and later suggesting it could rise to 15% — the longer-term fiscal and economic impact remains uncertain.
Meanwhile, the question of who actually pays for tariffs may have a sobering answer.
Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York finds that nearly 90% of tariff costs are borne by U.S. firms and consumers, rather than foreign producers (5).
Data from the Yale Budget Lab points in a similar direction. Prices for imported consumer goods and durable goods rose about 1.5% in 2025 through January, both well above prior-year comparisons. Estimates suggest tariff pass-through to consumer prices ranges from roughly 46% to 86% for core goods and 51% to 115% for durables (6).
That pressure comes as geopolitical conflicts are also pushing energy prices higher, with $4 gas making headlines.
The good news? Throughout history, savvy investors have often found ways to shield themselves from inflation's bite — even when policy out of Washington falls short.
LINK
A trade deficit occurs when a country imports more than it exports — and the U.S. has carried a massive trade deficit for decades.
The sharp narrowing in the first two months of the year was driven by a $62.6 billion (11.3%) year-over-year increase in exports, alongside a $73.5 billion (9.2%) decline in imports.
Tariffs are designed to discourage imports and reshape trade flows, so the trend isn't entirely unexpected.
But the comparison comes with important context.
The baseline period — early 2025 — coincided with a surge in imports, as firms rushed to bring in goods ahead of anticipated tariff announcements, potentially making the year-over-year drop appear more dramatic.
And on a sequential basis, the trend looks less clear-cut.
In February, the goods and services deficit widened by 4.9% from January to $57.3 billion. Exports rose 4.2% month over month to $314.8 billion, but imports increased slightly more — up 4.3% to $372.1 billion.
On one hand, they can protect domestic industries by making imported goods more expensive, giving local manufacturers a competitive edge. On the other hand, higher tariffs may result in increased costs for consumers, as companies pass on the extra expenses. This can lead to inflation, eroding household purchasing power and raising the cost of living.
There are also concerns that tariffs could draw retaliation from trading partners. But after October 2025 data showed America's trade deficit falling to its lowest level since 2009, some economists struck a more upbeat tone (3).
"The U.S. appears to be winning the trade war with tariffs curbing the imports of foreign goods, but America's trading partners are not holding any grudge as they continue to buy more American goods and services," said Chris Rupkey, chief economist at Fwdbonds.
Tariffs can also generate significant revenue for the federal government. According to the Brookings Institution, tariff revenue surged to $264 billion in 2025 — more than triple the amount in 2024 (4).
Trump has repeatedly floated the idea of returning some of that money to Americans in the form of a "tariff dividend," though the concept has yet to materialize.
And policy is still evolving. After scaling back sweeping tariffs to a 10% blanket rate — and later suggesting it could rise to 15% — the longer-term fiscal and economic impact remains uncertain.
Meanwhile, the question of who actually pays for tariffs may have a sobering answer.
Research from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York finds that nearly 90% of tariff costs are borne by U.S. firms and consumers, rather than foreign producers (5).
Data from the Yale Budget Lab points in a similar direction. Prices for imported consumer goods and durable goods rose about 1.5% in 2025 through January, both well above prior-year comparisons. Estimates suggest tariff pass-through to consumer prices ranges from roughly 46% to 86% for core goods and 51% to 115% for durables (6).
That pressure comes as geopolitical conflicts are also pushing energy prices higher, with $4 gas making headlines.
The good news? Throughout history, savvy investors have often found ways to shield themselves from inflation's bite — even when policy out of Washington falls short.
LINK
This post was edited on 4/14/26 at 6:06 pm
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:08 pm to FLTech
Isn’t a ‘deficit cut’ a cut in the deficit, which stands at 2T dollars?
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:12 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
Isn’t a ‘deficit cut’ a cut in the deficit, which stands at 2T dollars?
This is about the trade deficit, not the budget deficit.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:17 pm to JohnnyKilroy
OK , so…
What will the savings be applied to? The deficit, maybe? Or will we say “we got us a surplus let’s blow it on bombs and such”
What will the savings be applied to? The deficit, maybe? Or will we say “we got us a surplus let’s blow it on bombs and such”
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:20 pm to OccamsStubble
Applied to nothing, there is still a deficit, it was cut in half not gone compeltely. And this is the TRADE deficit not the budget deficit.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:21 pm to OccamsStubble
We didn’t save anything.
A trade deficit and a budget deficit are not the same thing.
A trade deficit and a budget deficit are not the same thing.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:22 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
A trade deficit and a budget deficit are not the same thing.
The biggest one being a constant trade deficit may be a good, bad or indifferent thing. A constant budget deficit is always a bad thing.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:23 pm to Flats
Always bitching no matter what
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:28 pm to FLTech
Funny how some of you people said NOTHING when there were deficits under other Presidents, but now we get a 55% slash in the trade deficit and you act like it's all Trump's fault.
Some of you people are so damn disingenuous, and I should probably apologize for using that term when much harsher words really apply here.
Some of you people are so damn disingenuous, and I should probably apologize for using that term when much harsher words really apply here.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:28 pm to FLTech
Now if we could get Congress to slash fricking spending by 55%, we’d be cooking with peanut oil.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:32 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Now if we could get Congress to slash fricking spending by 55%, we’d be cooking with peanut oil.
They won't even pass the Save Act. They don't give a damn about deficits as long as they get their cut of the fraud and wasteful spending.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 6:55 pm to KCT
quote:
Funny how some of you people said NOTHING when there were deficits under other Presidents
Why do you people do this?
Plenty of people complained about Obama and Biden spending too much.
Now many are complaining that Trump spends too much.
Geesh
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:00 pm to FLTech
Both parties to an exchange benefit, otherwise why would the transaction take place? The trade deficit doesn’t tell me much except for the fact that the biggest thing we export is the dollar. Unless we cut back our spending and transition away from a consumer spending driven economy, we aren’t going to be making anything because we’ll all be broke.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:02 pm to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Now if we could get Congress to slash fricking spending by 55%, we’d be cooking with peanut oil.
No seed oils.
Only verified beef tallow.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:10 pm to FLTech
From the very limited time I've been here, you guys spew the same headlines that the other side spews...
You complained about it now like how they complained about it then.
Are we doing the right things to change it? Or just complaining about it...
You complained about it now like how they complained about it then.
Are we doing the right things to change it? Or just complaining about it...
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:12 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
Isn’t a ‘deficit cut’ a cut in the deficit, which stands at 2T dollars?
They say you learn something new everyday.
Today you learned there are more than one type of deficit.
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:15 pm to KCT
quote:
Funny how some of you people said NOTHING when there were deficits under other Presidents, but now we get a 55% slash in the trade deficit and you act like it's all Trump's fault.
Some of you people are so damn disingenuous, and I should probably apologize for using that term when much harsher words really apply here.
wtf
lol this entire thread is an abomination of people talking past each other
Posted on 4/14/26 at 7:17 pm to Jbird
I know! i worked so hard to copy/paste this via my phone and it was a very difficult task to do.. At least they could have given me that much credit 
Popular
Back to top


9










