- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bullet used to kill charlie kirk cant be matched to Tyler Robinson gun.
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 3/30/26 at 11:57 pm
8
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:00 am to Scoper
Our Candace 
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:01 am to Scoper
The defense attorneys claim it doesn't match. There's a shocker. Let me see the evidence, then I'll believe it.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 12:02 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:01 am to SirWinston
Keep that annoying face out of here.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:03 am to Metaloctopus
Look at the video its so obvious it wasnt from that gun.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:03 am to Scoper
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:04 am to SirWinston
quote:
Look at the video its so obvious it wasnt from that gun.
I have seen the video, and there's nothing "obvious" about it. Group-think is not my conscience
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:09 am to SirWinston
quote:
Look at the video its so obvious it wasnt from that gun
Shape charge in the microphone, just like what was in the pagers. It’s so obvious.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:17 am to Scoper
Reasonable doubt IMO.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:42 am to RFK
If the bullet in Kirk's neck didn't come from the gun Robinson was holding, then the rifle is just a decoy "prop" to sell a specific narrative.
What were the "foreign connections" that Joe Kent wanted to investigate but wasnt allowed to?
What were the "foreign connections" that Joe Kent wanted to investigate but wasnt allowed to?
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 12:53 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:59 am to Metaloctopus
This board has been inundated by woke and retarded people.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 2:10 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
The defense attorneys claim it doesn't match. There's a shocker. Let me see the evidence, then I'll believe it.
Totally.
Imagine not suspecting this from the millisecond you read the title, then imagine downvoting someone for basically telling you that water is wet.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 2:11 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 2:18 am to SirWinston
quote:
Look at the video its so obvious it wasnt from that gun.
Oh good night, quit posting like a retard. Are you a ballistic expert? Your statement is so ignorant it is comical.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:14 am to SirWinston
quote:
What were the "foreign connections" that Joe Kent wanted to investigate but wasnt allowed to?
That there were 12 cell phones at the scene that day, that were registered to Israelis. Soon as they started looking into it, FBI shut em down.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:46 am to Scoper
quote:Any significance would depend on the bullet. Soft point or fragmented rounds are notoriously difficult to match.
Bullet used to kill charlie kirk cant be matched to Tyler Robinson gun.
DNA consistent with Robinson's was found on the trigger of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, and two unfired cartridges. Additionally, text messages between Robinson and his troonmate have Robinson discussing the rifle he left behind, calling it "the only evidence" he left at the scene. Lamenting that, and considering retrieving it.
There is also the tiny matter of Robinson's father seeing the photos released by authorities and confronting his son. At which time Robinson admitted being the assassin, but said he would rather die by suicide than turn himself in. So his father called a youth pastor close to the family, related the story and suicide threat, and both he and the father talked TR into turning himself in. So at a minimum TR confessed to the father, a pastor, and the troonmate. The pastor, who is also a court security officer, called the U.S. Marshals who brought TR in.
Sounds like an open-and-shut, slam-dunk case.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:54 am to RUFshreve
quote:Wait!
That there were 12 cell phones at the scene that day, that were registered to Israelis.
What?
So it's Joe Kent's contention that Israeli intel would carry phones traceable to Israel (and presumably to themselves), and additionally leave those phones turned on during an assassination which they organized and/or participated in?
Really?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:04 am to Scoper
They said this in the beginning. The bullet was fragmented. The surgeon said he recovered fragmented pieces. The other bullets recovered from the gun were jacketed soft point bullets that had an 80% chance of fragmenting if it hit bone from 142 yards. So if the bullet fragments are jsp then there is your evidence, unless you all know someone else with 30.06 jsp there that day.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 5:06 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:14 am to Scoper
Yeah, this is irresponsible reporting from a tabloid rag. The bullet fragmented and the results came out as "inconclusive" as a result of the bullet fragmenting upon impact. But of course the Daily Mail, which is the newspaper that broke the story, took that to mean the results came back as a "no match," which is patently false.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:14 am to Riverside
quote:
This board has been inundated by woke and retarded people.
Sir Winston had been here and retarded a long time.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:15 am to MikkUGA
quote:
The bullet was fragmented. The surgeon said he recovered fragmented pieces
Hunting bullet doing what a hunting bullet is designed to do, not what a FMJ will do
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News