Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

The middle eastern slave trade v. the trans-Atlantic slave trade. One major difference.

Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:01 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81711 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:01 am
If someone tries to deny that Arabs took slaves because they have no descendants in Arab lands, be sure and let them know why that is.

Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
21640 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:09 am to
LINK

Matt Walsh’s Real History episode on slavery explains this very well. It is a
Must Watch.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114447 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:19 am to
Also...

Whites ended the transatlantic slave trade (Britain - by legislation; USA - by the blood of millions and the deaths over over 600k).

Some parts of African still practice it.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7405 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:24 am to
They didn't just "Cut their balls off"

In the Ottoman Empire there were White Eunuchs (Balls Cut off to make them more docile)
And Black Eunuchs (They cut off the frank with the beans to ensure a zero percent chance of any sexual activity)

Yes, they castrated differently due to race.
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21437 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:47 am to
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18476 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:49 am to
It's hilarious because arabs are part of the whole "in this together " bullshite the woke put out.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
54546 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 11:59 am to
quote:

Whites ended the transatlantic slave trade (Britain - by legislation; USA - by the blood of millions and the deaths over over 600k).

Britain deserves more credit than you are giving it. They deployed the Royal Navy off the coasts of Africa and, at great expense, suppressed the slave trade.
Posted by Chili Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
755 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

USA - by the blood of millions and the deaths over over 600k).


The Civil War wasn’t about slavery until Lincoln (1864) saw his re-election was in jeopardy. His plan was to send the slaves back to Africa. Don’t try to rewrite history to fit your narrative.
Posted by PrattvilleTiger
Montgomery, AL
Member since May 2020
2716 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 12:37 pm to
Wow. That was interesting! I want to watch more of his documentaries.
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
1047 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

The Civil War wasn’t about slavery until Lincoln (1864) saw his re-election was in jeopardy. His plan was to send the slaves back to Africa. Don’t try to rewrite history to fit your narrative.


Darn. If it wasn’t for those pesky articles of Secession, we would’ve gotten away with it!
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10053 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 12:52 pm to
One of the biggest slave traders in East Africa was a black man, called Tippu Tip. His estate is now a museum to him in Zanzibar. He also traded ivory and ran plantations and was the personal representative of the Sultan of the Omani Caliphate. He’s still revered as a great man.

Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
64836 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Britain deserves more credit than you are giving it. They deployed the Royal Navy off the coasts of Africa and, at great expense, suppressed the slave trade.

And yet, they are cast as the evil enemy in that anti-white propaganda film 'Woman King' which ignores the fact that the Woman King people were the slavers.
Posted by fladohado
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
3130 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 2:19 pm to
Hence marines hymn “Shores of Tripoli”
The First Barbary War in 1805..

We were fighting the Muslims over 200 years ago over kidnapping and enslaving our sailors. They continued to enslave for years after.
This post was edited on 3/29/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted by RTM4
Pflugerville
Member since Apr 2018
2357 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 2:21 pm to
Look at that white beard. Cracker if I ever saw one.... or some cracker edited his portrait.

This chit is so foolish, it's just a money grab from lazy arse people.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
90565 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 2:22 pm to
do somalis look like blacks in the congo? no. why?

arab blood
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
11033 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:


The Civil War wasn’t about slavery until Lincoln (1864) saw his re-election was in jeopardy. His plan was to send the slaves back to Africa. Don’t try to rewrite history to fit your narrative.


Darn. If it wasn’t for those pesky articles of Secession, we would’ve gotten away with it!


So, you think Lincoln started the war because slavery was written in those articles?

He started the war because he didn't want to lose the power and wealth of the southern states. Lincoln's reason for the war, which is what you were responding to, had nothing to do with slavery.

Lincoln's reasons are not the South's reasons.
Posted by Tammany Tom
Mandeville
Member since Jun 2004
5791 posts
Posted on 3/29/26 at 4:01 pm to
And…. Who owned the overwhelming majority of Slave Ships?

The Jews.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram