Started By
Message

Charlie had direct access to POTUS but only told Joe Kent his moral convictions about war?

Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:33 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
181317 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:33 am
“Wow Charlie so you feel a strong moral conviction about not going to war with Iran… you should tell Donald Trump!”

“No… not this time”

“Ok, how about Marco Rubio? Or Pete Hegseth!”

“NO. This is IMPORTANT. I’m taking it to Joe Kent”


He and Vance were also very close


It's crazy to see Tucker, Candace, and now Joe Kent use Charlie's name when he isn't here to clarify or defend what they are alleging. It's pretty despicable and gross


Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81701 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:36 am to

I didn't know a whole lot about Charlie but I appreciated everything that I saw.

Looking back it is painfully clear that he was the glue holding much of the MAGA coalition together.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
9318 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:36 am to
I'm so tired of hearing people invoke Charlie Kirks name in furtherance of a political agenda. Anyone doing so is not to be trusted.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
12972 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Joe Kent

Posted by StrongOffer
Member since Sep 2020
6681 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:37 am to
quote:


I'm so tired of hearing people invoke Charlie Kirks name in furtherance of a political agenda. Anyone doing so is not to be trusted.
1000%
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
14278 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:42 am to
Joe Kent was on Shawn Ryan 3 months ago talking about how much of a threat Iran is…

Either Chinese or Islamic money is behind a lot of these guys
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
9318 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Joe Kent was on Shawn Ryan 3 months ago talking about how much of a threat Iran is…

Either Chinese or Islamic money is behind a lot of these guys


In my eyes it's pretty simple. They saw what they thought was an opportunity to fracture his base based on his "no new wars" stance and they jumped on it. Now suddenly we have an Intel guy who was warning everyone of the threat of Iran jumping ship and clearly contradicting his own damn self and invoking the supposed words of a man who is no longer on this earth to verify.

And what are we to do, assume that Charlie Kirk was the one who changed this Intel agent's mind about the supposed threat Iran posed? It makes no fricking sense.

Kent seems to be a snake. He isn't behaving honorably.
Posted by High Life
Member since Dec 2014
3814 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

I'm so tired of hearing people invoke Charlie Kirks name in furtherance of a political agenda. Anyone doing so is not to be trusted.


Yea we should trust the fbi and the joos
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
9318 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:56 am to
quote:

and the joos


What the frick is up with you weirdos? I currently have a thread up criticizing Netanyahu for his words about Christ, so you can't claim I'm some sort of Israel sympathizer or anything, but you people are just nuts with this shite.

Jew this, Jew that. Do you have a single original thought in your brain?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
22491 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Wow Charlie so you feel a strong moral conviction about not going to war with Iran… you should tell Donald Trump!”

You don’t think Charlie Kirk was lobbying to avoid war in Iran?

Here are clips of him doing just that on his own show in his own words:

Here he calls it “pathologically insane”
Youtube Link

There are dozens of others including his appearance on Patrick Bet David where he specifically calls out Israel for driving for war there:
Youtube Link
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
9318 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:06 pm to
Charlie was against war - period. But that isn't really the issue. This Kent character makes it sound like Kirk was the one who changed his mind on the Iranian threat and that his dying words were "please tell me you'll keep us from going to war with Iran" with the clear implication being that he was killed because he didn't want the US Government to attack a nation who has steadily been attacking it for 50 years. It's nonsense. All of this Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and now Joe Kent bullshite overlooks the one group who had the strongest motive to have Kirk killed. The left. All of this bullshite is designed to fracture the MAGA base and it's obvious.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70525 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:07 pm to
Everyone invokes Kirk to solidify their own opinions these days. People who vehemently disagree with each other claim Charlie agreed with them. It's so transparent and pathetic.
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
9761 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:09 pm to
How do you know that Kirk didn’t discuss his thoughts on Iran war with Trump?
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
181317 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:14 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 12:14 pm
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
181317 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Charlie was against war - period. But that isn't really the issue. This Kent character makes it sound like Kirk was the one who changed his mind on the Iranian threat and that his dying words were "please tell me you'll keep us from going to war with Iran" with the clear implication being that he was killed because he didn't want the US Government to attack a nation who has steadily been attacking it for 50 years



This

Charlie even supported the attacks in 2025 as the tweet above shows

I am anti-war but not anti-wiping Iran off the face of the earth. There is a difference
Posted by TIGERVATO
Spring, TX.
Member since Jan 2008
1963 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:16 pm to
Charlie did not agree with everything DJT did but he always said he had faith and trust in whatever DJT decided to do. Charlie grew frustrated in how the administration handled the Epstein thing but he trusted the final outcome.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
9318 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

am anti-war but not anti-wiping Iran off the face of the earth. There is a difference


Same. Iran is literally the only country I would actually support us just going in and fricking their shite up.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
22491 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:35 pm to
I posted three links to contradict CK wanting some larger war in Iran.

There’s also an honest distinction to be made between a missile strike and ground involvement.

What we have right now is a missile/air campaign without ground troops. I think it’s crystal clear CK was opposed to a full Iraq style ground campaign, whether he’d have gone nuclear over what we have currently is less clear.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
88512 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Looking back it is painfully clear that he was the glue holding much of the MAGA coalition together.


Or people just couldn't blame the Jews for his death when he was still alive.





Posted by Usmc
Member since Oct 2024
453 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:47 pm to
The fall of Joe Kent doesn't suprise me like it would have 8 years ago.
When Maddog Mattis went establishment during Trump 1 it kind of destroyed my view of epic figures in service.

I do what I can... Which is to remember them as the warriors they were and not the suits they became.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram