Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

If we stick with McMahon, why not give basketball NIL money to football/ baseball?

Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:29 am
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
21505 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:29 am
I understand we probably just gonna stay with him because of his contract. Given his track record ,we are more than likely gonna finish around last place again. Why not cancel NIL money to the basketball program until we get a good coach? Hell we could run a good rec team out next season and finish last
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
18504 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:30 am to
What a dumbass idea
Posted by tigersham
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2023
512 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:33 am to
Wade will be coaching LSU next year
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4730 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Why not cancel NIL money to the basketball program until we get a good coach? Hell we could run a good rec team out next season and finish last
If you don't want any attendance at the games you could do this. Even if you got Will Wade or another coach with some moxy, you've set the program back by overtly slapping the fans in the face. It's a choice, but it's a stupid choice. Do you work in the Athletic Department?
Posted by LSUfan2008
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2005
2709 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:41 am to
quote:

If you don't want any attendance at the games you could do this

There won't be any attendance if they give McClown a fifth year.
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4730 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:51 am to
quote:

There won't be any attendance if they give McClown a fifth year.
No so fast, my friend. Red Panda is back in action.
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
21505 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

slapping the fans in the face
I’d argue that it’s a slap in the face to bring McMahon back again.
Posted by Lapaz
Member since Dec 2018
826 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:08 am to
That's myopic and shortsighted. We were more competitive this year than last year with the better talent we got with the increased NIL, despite the injuries, and had a couple of solid non-conference wins with the healthy roster. That provided some enjoyment and hope to the fans, even though they were dashed during the conference games. The only way to retain and attract talent is with the NIL. If we don't provide NIL, we won't have any chance at all next year, and will lose all of our players, which would set the program back for more than just next year. That would do reputational damage that would last far longer, and that would make it harder to attract a good coach. Most coaches would consider that before taking the job. I know rosters CAN be built from scratch, but that is much harder to do than if you can return some talent. If we don't even try to field a competitive team next year, then it would be devastating to the program for years to come.
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4730 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:44 am to
If they are in a position to do something and don’t then that’s a slap in the face. If there are no desirable coaches or the financing doesn’t make sense, then it is what it is. So, blanket statements don’t help, but I get it. This is a ‘rant’ board and fans are emotional.
Posted by BowDownToLSU
Livingston louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
21505 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 10:48 am to
quote:

We were more competitive this year than last year with the better talent we got with the increased NIL, despite the injuries,
we were 3-15 last year and 3-15 this year
quote:

had a couple of solid non-conference wins
best non conference win was SMU ( 8-10 conference record) made first four in
quote:

If we don't provide NIL, we won't have any chance at all next year, and will lose all of our players, which would set the program back for more than just next year
meh we going to finish last again anyway if MM comes back
quote:

That would do reputational damage that would last far longer, and that would make it harder to attract a good coach. Most coaches would consider that before taking the job.
this is a valid point , one I didn’t think of I’m just pissed because we aren’t moving in a different direction
Posted by The Truth 34
Chavez Ravine
Member since May 2010
41742 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

If there are no desirable coaches


Any coach would be more desirable than this clown.
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4730 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Any coach would be more desirable than this clown.
Lazy and emotional. Nice.
Posted by Sissidog02
Member since Jan 2020
7258 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:15 am to
It would be the last straw for the actual MBB fans, 1/2 price season tickets for seniors over 65 and great grandkids get in free, incoming
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
35388 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Lazy and emotional. Nice.


That statement is more indicative of just how low the program is. LSU finished last in the SEC (for the second time in 4 years), has the fewest conf. wins over 4 seasons (excluding TX and OU), and is the only SEC program to not reach the NCAA Tournament...or come even close to do so. So yes, ANY coach would be more desirable because the results, if the goal is winning and at least qualifying for postseason play, can't get any worse. There is no further level below worst in the conference.

EDT:

Bringing back McMahon doesn't give the fanbase any reason to believe the results will change. There will be a % of season ticket holders who don't renew their tickets because they won't feel the cost is worth it. Particularly when there will be thousands of tickets available on the secondary market well below face value. No one will place any emphasis or trust in winning record vs. a really bad non-conf. schedule because everyone will have seen that story for 4 years...and knows how it ends.

That means the EARLIEST you might have some interest would be a few weeks into January after SEC play started. However, if McMahon goes 1-7 to start SEC play, like he has for 3 of his 4 seasons at LSU, anyone who MIGHT have thought about paying attention, won't.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 11:29 am
Posted by RoyalWe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2018
4730 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:25 am to
quote:

So yes, ANY coach would be more desirable because the results,
I don't think I see any recent posters disagreeing with this statement. The question isn't IF, it's WHEN. I even agree with Mr. Lazy and Emotional, but he wants to cut his nose off to spite his face. I'm saying that it should be done tactically/strategically. If the answer is "clown-man out now" then I'm available and will submit my resume ASAP.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
90642 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:25 am to
some body update this for the list

SEC win % by LSU coaches for the past 60 years:

2022-25 Matt McMahon- 24%

17-21: Will Wade- 63%

12-16: Johnny Jones 46%

08-11: Trent Johnson-39%

97-07- John Brady-44%

72-96: Dale Brown- 54%

66-71: Press Maravich-42%

65-65 Frank Truitt- 23%
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
37514 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 11:53 am to
quote:

That statement is more indicative of just how low the program is. LSU finished last in the SEC (for the second time in 4 years), has the fewest conf. wins over 4 seasons (excluding TX and OU),


You wanna know what’s sad?



You can include Texas and OU and it’s really close 17 v 15 v 13


2 more seasons and only 4 more SEC wins than a coach that needed a vote of confidence at the end of the season.


Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
35388 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:04 pm to
There is no objective reason to keep McMahon unless LSU/donors don't want to pay a buyout for McMahon...ever. If so, that's fine. Just be honest with the fans and say "He's staying for 3 more seasons and we don't really care about the results"...because that's what you are saying by keeping him. Otherwise, just pushing a decision off a year doesn't change anything to a significant degree. All of the football costs will still be here (BK buyout, Kiffin and staff salary, NIL).
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
8297 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:39 pm to
Well it would seem to be just the opposite. If you stay with this clown basketball would need that NIL money from football and baseball. Not recommended.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
33389 posts
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:48 pm to
All of the On3 insiders are hinting this is over and we have Wade.


My body is ready
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram