Started By
Message

Judge Strikes Down Kennedy’s Vaccine Policies

Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:33 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
38636 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:33 pm
LINK

quote:

Ruling on a lawsuit brought by several prominent medical organizations, a district court said the federal government did not base its decisions on science in limiting Covid shots and changing the childhood immunization schedule.


quote:

A U.S. district court in Massachusetts on Monday blocked the government from implementing a series of decisions on vaccines made over the last year by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The court also reversed, at least for the time being, all decisions made by the panelists that Mr. Kennedy appointed to the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices, which makes recommendations on which vaccines Americans should take. The ruling prevents the panelists from meeting later this week as scheduled.

The ruling brought an abrupt halt to the major changes that Mr. Kennedy, who has long been skeptical of vaccines, had set in motion, upending national vaccine policy and making sweeping revisions to the recommendations for what shots are given and when. Those included cutting down the number of diseases covered by routine immunization, and restricting access to Covid vaccines, two pillars of Mr. Kennedy’s vaccine agenda.

Judge Brian Murphy delivered the ruling in a lawsuit brought by six medical organizations, contending that Mr. Kennedy and his appointees have made arbitrary and capricious changes to the childhood vaccine schedule, bypassing the careful, evidence-based practice that in the past has underpinned the recommendations.


quote:

The ruling will almost certainly be appealed. But the decision was the clearest outcome yet in an escalating battle between the medical establishment and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which under Mr. Kennedy has embraced anti-vaccine conspiracies, including debunked theories that childhood shots cause autism, asthma or other diseases.
Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
8435 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:34 pm to
We gotta do something about these fricking judges.

I guess in a way though it's good. Take it to court.
This post was edited on 3/16/26 at 6:35 pm
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15585 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:35 pm to
frick big pharma and this judge
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
18973 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:37 pm to
No one is restricting access to the covid vaccine... it's just the age/conditions that have changed, right?

And, ita with an above poster, frick pharma and frick this judge.

Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
41108 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:37 pm to
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5334 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

We gotta do something about these fricking judges.


We could easily be doing recess appointments, right? This is not a free country. The regime dominates even when we elect a supposed outsider.

Piss on it all
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61586 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:39 pm to
quote:

We gotta do something about these fricking judges.

I guess in a way though it's good. Take it to court.



Unelected and yet in a very real sense, passing legislation.

Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
21338 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

frick big pharma and this judge


Is America at war with big pharma and judges? Are vaccines threatening or killing Americans?
Posted by MikkUGA
Destin
Member since Jun 2014
2663 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:41 pm to
No one is restricting anyone from getting any vaccine. This actually changes nothing. It was just a recommended list. You didnt have to get them or you could get them if you wanted. This was a waste of time and money.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
64445 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

district court said the federal government did not base its decisions on science


Ok. What's the legal reasoning?
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
21598 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

bypassing the careful, evidence-based practice


There it is. The appeal to authority. A biased and decidedly UN-scientific authority which is actually a group of ideologues who shut down any scientific debate with claims of “settled science.”

Posted by Arbengal
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
3474 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:47 pm to
Biden appointment. Go figure
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55303 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

No one is restricting access to the covid vaccine... it's just the age/conditions that have changed, right?

And, ita with an above poster, frick pharma and frick this judge.



Correct.

I think Bobby is simply telling the American people the list of vaccines he believes should be administered to children who attend public schools. If parents want to take the advice of their pediatrician and administer 40-50 vaccines before a kid is 16 have at it.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114259 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:47 pm to
This fricking guy.

He's been reversed a few times already. Expect another.
Posted by Longdriver98
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Nov 2005
3551 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:50 pm to
Because he gets Millions from big pharma.
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3440 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:55 pm to
Policies are not laws……why is a judge involved……

In any case a recommendation is not a requirement …

No one with a brain is getting a MRNA jab…..

No reason to take a jab that has more downside than the disease it is meant for….
Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
2455 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:56 pm to
Just another lawfare ruling soon to be inevitably short lived in defiance of the GEOTUS
Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
2263 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 6:58 pm to
Americans embrace their role as the world’s lab-rats.

Every civilized nation bans tv advertising of pharmaceutical drugs except the US which has one every 3rd commercial.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
6361 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 7:27 pm to
It will be successfully appealed.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
35580 posts
Posted on 3/16/26 at 7:28 pm to
I think there are details missing here in the OP. I read another article that said the judgement was because the Kennedy and his appointments failed to follow the documented legal procedure for changing the vaccine requirements and recommendations. If that's accurate, then the judgement is right. We can't just pick and choose which laws and regulations we want to follow ignore. Basic ideological consistency.

Now, if the reality is like what is posted in the OP, that the just rules because the courts "felt" that the changes weren't based in "the science", but they were actually made following the legal processes then this ruling is bad and should fall on appeal.

But yet again, we just fricking LOVE to just to the quickest conclusion that matches our bias 'round here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram