- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:21 am
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:21 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
The math on this project should mass-humble every AI lab on the planet.
1 cubic millimeter. One-millionth of a human brain. Harvard and Google spent 10 years mapping it. The imaging alone took 326 days.
They sliced the tissue into 5,000 wafers each 30 nanometers thick, ran them through a $6 million electron microscope, then needed Google’s ML models to stitch the 3D reconstruction because no human team could process the output.
The result: 57,000 cells, 150 million synapses, 230 millimeters of blood vessels, compressed into 1.4 petabytes of raw data. For context, 1.4 petabytes is roughly 1.4 million gigabytes. From a speck smaller than a grain of rice.
Now scale that. The full human brain is one million times larger. Mapping the whole thing at this resolution would produce approximately 1.4 zettabytes of data. That’s roughly equal to all the data generated on Earth in a single year. The storage alone would cost an estimated $50 billion and require a 140-acre data center, which would make it the largest on the planet.
And they found things textbooks don’t contain. One neuron had over 5,000 connection points. Some axons had coiled themselves into tight whorls for completely unknown reasons. Pairs of cell clusters grew in mirror images of each other. Jeff Lichtman, the Harvard lead, said there’s “a chasm between what we already know and what we need to know.”
This is why the next step isn’t a human brain. It’s a mouse hippocampus, 10 cubic millimeters, over the next five years. Because even a mouse brain is 1,000x larger than what they just mapped, and the full mouse connectome is the proof of concept before anyone attempts the human one. We’re building AI systems that loosely mimic neural networks while still unable to fully read the wiring diagram of a single cubic millimeter of the thing we’re trying to imitate. The original is 1.4 petabytes per millionth of its volume. Every AI model on Earth fits in a fraction of that.
The brain runs on 20 watts and fits in your skull. The data center required to merely describe one-millionth of it would span 140 acres.
I guess we are just supposed to have faith that all of this evolved because lightning struck some soup and then randomly mutated into this!
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:26 am to RebelExpress38
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are if they still believe complex life was birthed from a single cell organism in a primordial soup somewhere on earth 4 billion years ago.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:26 am to RebelExpress38
quote:
The brain runs on 20 watts and fits in your skull. The data center required to merely describe one-millionth of it would span 140 acres.
*Taps the sign
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:27 am to RebelExpress38
How is this support for intelligent design?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:29 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are if they still believe complex life was birthed from a single cell organism in a primordial soup somewhere on earth 4 billion years ago.
Versus someone snapping their fingers and everything appeared in seven days ?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:29 am to RebelExpress38
I’ve never understood why the religious zealots refuse the notion that God created life through the natural processes we’ve discovered/hypothesized.
Life developing from single cells over 4 billion years isn’t really any more of a stretch than God just plopping down a single man and woman in a thicket somewhere.
Life developing from single cells over 4 billion years isn’t really any more of a stretch than God just plopping down a single man and woman in a thicket somewhere.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:30 am to Bass Tiger
quote:Exactly. Non-life creates life. The material produces the immaterial. That which has no purpose or direction creates that which produces purpose and direction.
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are if they still believe complex life was birthed from a single cell organism in a primordial soup somewhere on earth 4 billion years ago.
As the late Dr. Greg Bahnsen used to say, no matter how much you toy with the ingredients, a cake mix cannot produce a political constitution (like the U.S. Constitution).
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:31 am to RebelExpress38
None of this supports intelligent design.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:33 am to RebelExpress38
quote:
I guess we are just supposed to have faith that all of this evolved because lightning struck some soup and then randomly mutated into this!
If anyone is interested in a good book that breaks down the case for intelligent design/creation and lays out the proof read "Why the Universe is the Way It Is" by Hugh Ross.
It is only about 135-140 pages, but it is crammed full of information with all the receipts. Highly recommend.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:33 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are
Basically every invention you use in your modern life was created by a non christian. Dunning-Kruger.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:34 am to tiggerfan02 2021
quote:
crammed full of information with all the receipts
What are the receipts?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:38 am to Mo Jeaux
The mathematical calculations and explanations of why the only way things can exist as they are requiring these calculations and designs at a minute level with almost zero margin for error or the whole thing would go sideways from the PhD physicist who wrote the book.
There are tons of footnotes and sources too.
It is not light bedtime reading, but it is fascinating if these things interest you.
There are tons of footnotes and sources too.
It is not light bedtime reading, but it is fascinating if these things interest you.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:45 am to RebelExpress38
Definitely not Somalis, they're running on GB (if that).
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:48 am to Mo Jeaux
Why is every dumb liberal on this thread against creation?? Amazing to think about that
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:53 am to Decatur
quote:
Versus someone snapping their fingers and everything appeared in seven days
6
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:55 am to Indefatigable
quote:
plopping down a single man and woman
He plopped neither down. You think they were teleported or something? You should have an idea about what you’re arguing about before engaging.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:57 am to TexasForever81
Eh only off by one day which seems pretty negligible for a universe that’s around 13.8 billion years old.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 11:59 am to dafif
quote:
Why is every dumb liberal on this thread against creation?? Amazing to think about that
Who are these dumb liberals?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:02 pm to dafif
quote:
Why is every dumb liberal on this thread against creation?? Amazing to think about that
They believe in “science” yet think a man can magically turn into a woman.
Really stupid folks.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:03 pm to TexasForever81
quote:
He plopped neither down. You think they were teleported or something? You should have an idea about what you’re arguing about before engaging.
Oh ok. Making one out of dirt and the other from a rib is more believable.
Popular
Back to top


23




