- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Drug TV commercials aren’t made to sell drugs, but to keep the networks quiet
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:00 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:00 am
Why not have a red pill?
When is the last time you saw a TV news report about the side effects / negative results for a drug that advertises on said network? (If you watch TV). Spending money on commercials keeps the news rooms in line.
Doctors who can prescribe the drugs are already bought off by the drug reps. They don’t care about commercials.
When is the last time you saw a TV news report about the side effects / negative results for a drug that advertises on said network? (If you watch TV). Spending money on commercials keeps the news rooms in line.
Doctors who can prescribe the drugs are already bought off by the drug reps. They don’t care about commercials.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:02 am to weagle1999
quote:
When is the last time you saw a TV news report about the side effects / negative results for a drug that advertises on said network? (If you watch TV). Spending money on commercials keeps the news rooms in line.
The commercials disclose all the side effects already.
quote:
Doctors who can prescribe the drugs are already bought off by the drug reps.
How so? Be specific.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:02 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:07 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
The commercials disclose all the side effects already.
Some of them at 100 words per minute speed. Wouldn’t it be interesting to watch neutral investigation into these drugs?
quote:
How so? Be specific.
Drug reps.
And maybe ‘bought off’ was too strong a term in my part.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:10 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:10 am to weagle1999
This was a major redpill moment in my life. Happened shortly before COVID.
(And, full disclosure, I sued pharmaceutical companies back in the day.)
(And, full disclosure, I sued pharmaceutical companies back in the day.)
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:11 am to weagle1999
quote:
Doctors who can prescribe the drugs are already bought off by the drug reps.
I had a doctor who always had pharm reps in his office. They were always waiting in the back... They were all pretty hot.. I never saw a male rep there. I don't think he was bought or paid off, but you could tell which rep he probably liked more by what he would prescribe at the time. There was always a pharm doing "big things" that he liked what they were doing and would prescribe shite.. "just in case".
My current doctor is almost the opposite. He prescribes as little as possible and will start you off with a low dose and then go up if needed. I never see pharm reps at his place.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:11 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
How so? Be specific.
The OT is full of medical experts that have no idea how the system actually works.
They like to antagonize the "defund the police" crowd and mock them when something bad happens and the first thing they do is say "someone call the cops!"
Yet they antagonize the healthcare industry and act like all physicians are scam artists with no moral compass and zero desire to help patients, while getting kickbacks from the drug companies. As if the stark statute and anti-kickback statute aren't highly punishable offenses within the healthcare field. But the OT won't hesitate to run to one of these evil providers when their geriatric asses get hurt or start having chest pain.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:12 am to weagle1999
quote:
Drug reps.
And maybe ‘bought off’ was too strong a term in my part.
Ok so what about them? What are they doing that is so sinister to force them to prescribe?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:14 am to weagle1999
quote:
Drug TV commercials aren’t made to sell drugs, but to keep the networks quiet
Then explain drug ads on ESPN and HGTV.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:15 am to weagle1999
quote:
Some of them at 100 words per minute speed. Wouldn’t it be interesting to watch neutral investigation into these drugs?
The FDA does this and it's very thorough. There is also required adverse event reporting for all Pharma companies. The vast majority of drugs that enter clinical trials do not receive approval and there are many examples of drugs being pulled off the market after approval for various reasons including side effects, a lack of efficacy, and the like.
And none of the above precludes anyone (say, a channel that does not receive any money to run Pharma ads) from running whatever stories they'd like.
And how does this communication work...are you suggesting that when these media companies are buying the placements, they're saying hey, we'll run with you guys but you cannot do any investigative reporting into their products? How exactly would that get communicated and agreed to?
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:19 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:16 am to weagle1999
It seems half the population depends on their pills. I'm sure it is no one on this website though.
Per CDC:
Per CDC:
quote:
Percent of people using at least one prescription drug in the past 30 days: 49.9% (2017-March 2020)
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:16 am to Chucktown_Badger
I shouldn’t have implied that it was sinister.
I think the doctors’ minds are largely influenced by things other than commercials. Free lunched and dinners and such.
I think the doctors’ minds are largely influenced by things other than commercials. Free lunched and dinners and such.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:18 am to OweO
I fail to see any issues or anything untoward in what you just described.
And this may shock some people, but many doctors are dudes. They tend to prefer speaking to attractive women just like the rest of us non-soys. As such, they are more likely to find time to speak to those reps.
And this may shock some people, but many doctors are dudes. They tend to prefer speaking to attractive women just like the rest of us non-soys. As such, they are more likely to find time to speak to those reps.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:18 am to Willie Stroker
ESPN is owned by Disney, right? Who also I think owns ABC and other properties?
Do you think Disney is going to do a movie anytime soon about the negative affects of Pfizer’s product line?
Do you think Disney is going to do a movie anytime soon about the negative affects of Pfizer’s product line?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:19 am to weagle1999
quote:
When is the last time you saw a TV news report about the side effects / negative results for a drug that advertises on said network?
Every single time.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:20 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:22 am to Chucktown_Badger
I think it is mutually understood. Sort of like how gun magazines would never say anything bad about Kimber and what a coincidence, Kimber has a full page ad on the back of the magazine each month.
When is the last time you saw a network who airs these commercials ever complete any investigative journalism into any pharmaceutical products? Or the industry as a whole?
When is the last time you saw a network who airs these commercials ever complete any investigative journalism into any pharmaceutical products? Or the industry as a whole?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:22 am to weagle1999
quote:
I think the doctors’ minds are largely influenced by things other than commercials. Free lunched and dinners and such
That is retarded. I’m not going to prescribe a medication just because a rep brought in lunch.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:23 am to weagle1999
quote:
Free lunched and dinners and such.
They can only provide meals when given as part of an educational session and those meals must be modest in price (think sandwiches). They cannot be "grab and go" for the staff either.
They can't even give away pens anymore.
The Wild West of Pharma was over about 20 years ago at this point. You guys should read the PHrMA Code...it's all in there.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:25 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:23 am to LSUTANGERINE
And even the less likely side side effects are broadly mentioned...
Every. Single. Drug. has side effects.
But, just don't take them, right?
Every. Single. Drug. has side effects.
But, just don't take them, right?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:24 am to Chucktown_Badger
The drug companies get the doctors in line early, in medical school, by sponsoring educational programs like grand rounds. They are trained to prescribe a pill first line instead of recommending lifestyle modifications.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:25 am to N2cars
quote:
And even the less likely side side effects are broadly mentioned...
Every. Single. Drug. has side effects.
No shite. It's all mandated what they have to disclose and is based on the incidences of specific side effects in the clinical trials of the drug, most often their phase III pivotal trials. The actual label and the language within it is also negotiated as part of those FDA reviews.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 11:26 am
Popular
Back to top

18






