Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Exxon begins commercial CCS project with CF industries in Louisiana

Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:26 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
28257 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:26 am
quote:

Jan 26 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil said on Monday it has begun its commercial operation of carbon capture and storage, or CCS, with ammonia producer CF Industries in Louisiana, starting in 2025.

The project will transport and store up to 2 million tonnes a year (MTPA) of carbon dioxide from CF Industries' Donaldsonville complex, the company said.

Carbon capture is a process through which carbon dioxide (CO2) generated from industrial activity is stored underground. The process has been embraced by oil companies including Chevron, Occidental Petroleum and Talos Energy.

The energy major has also signed agreements with AtmosClear and Lake Charles Methanol II to handle up to a combined 2 MTPA of CO2 from their planned projects in Louisiana. Additionally, it expects to start CCS operations with Linde and Nucor later this year.

Exxon plans to advance multiple CCS developments across Texas and Louisiana and is targeting a final investment decision on its first low-carbon data center by the end of 2026.



LINK
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138385 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Exxon plans to advance multiple CCS developments across Texas and Louisiana and is targeting a final investment decision on its first low-carbon data center by the end of 2026.



Is this for their own use?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58686 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:29 am to
I thought Trump made libtarbon democrapture illegal
Posted by Tifway419
Member since Sep 2022
1967 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:37 am to
What do they do with it after they store it?
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
28257 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:39 am to
Probably depends on what the tax credit allows them to do. Some credits have a rule that it must stay stored “forever”/100 years.

Other credits will still allow you to pull it out later to use for secondary oil & gas recovery.
Posted by skidry
Member since Jul 2009
3565 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:39 am to
Cash a yuge check of your tax dollars.


Thanks bro!
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 10:40 am
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
58436 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:07 am to
We're fighting something similar in North La. A group of local investors was organized to bring in a "biomass" (read: thinnings from logging) powered electrical plant and the resulting CO2 would be injected under the Wilcox formation (there was supposed to be a "green" jetfuel company involved in that as well, but I've heard reports it may have pulled out).

While the local investors are promoting this as jobs, they are failing to mention that without the 45Q tax credits for the sequestration part, the whole thing fails to draw enough profits to run.

What they also fail to mention is the liability aspect. There's a $500k cap on damages per event. If the injection fails, let's say it seeps up through fractures and coalesces into a bubble that blows out a hole near someone's home... that homeowner can't get more than $500k from the company for their damages. If there are 10 homes around the hole, they split $500k.

Fifty years after the last bit of CO2 goes into the ground, the state takes over maintenance and monitoring of the wells but the property owners are responsible for damages which may happen from the CO2 seeping back up. And yes, leaks can happen.

Where I'm at odds the most on this is that the project hasn't even started yet and there has already been legislation passed (seemingly despite Article I, Section 4 and Article 4, Section 21) to allow the Commissioner of Conservation at DNR (or whatever they renamed themselves) to be the sole determiner for what properties can be expropriated for CCS projects. There's currently a case that should be going before the state supreme court before long to settle this part one way or another.
Posted by ThatTahoeOverThere
Member since Nov 2021
4772 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:24 am to
The stainless steel involved must be crazy
Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
3961 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:18 pm to
Probably sub all the material and fab to asia or india.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40655 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:24 pm to
My company won a contract just this week for a CCS project in Denmark that will happen in Q2 of this year. This will be my first time being involved with a CCS project. Should be interesting to see how it’s executed compared to a GT or O&G project. They have a pretty extensive coring program planned for one.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
28257 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

CCS project in Denmark


Gonna move it to Greenland when we acquire it.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40655 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Gonna move it to Greenland when we acquire it.


Sounds like a good opportunity to expand my market.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71503 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

carbon capture


fricking galactically stupid.
Posted by SECCaptain
Member since Jun 2025
1947 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

secondary oil & gas recovery.


Let’s not kid ourselves, this is why it’s done. Using CO2 instead of water for fracking
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
28257 posts
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Using CO2 instead of water for fracking


Umm…I’ll go ask one of our completions engineers if he can try to frack one of our upcoming horizontals with CO2.
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 1:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram