- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
One good unintended consequence of Trump removing illegal aliens
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:08 pm
The Democrats seem to have embraced the concept of State’s Rights albeit misguided when it comes to illegal immigration which is a Federal issue. It’s important to remember we are a Republic.
Course when there is another Democrat President they will forget this because it will be (D)ifferent.
Course when there is another Democrat President they will forget this because it will be (D)ifferent.
5
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:09 pm to UptownJoeBrown
States rights and pro 2A.
What a world.
What a world.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:10 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
and pro 2A.
Oh yeah. That too! Yay!
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:11 pm to UptownJoeBrown
With the media running 24/7 cover and swaying the minds of the masses, it genuinely doesn’t matter that Dems flow back and forth like this.
It literally does not matter.
It literally does not matter.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:20 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Courts said:
1. They don't HAVE to assist feds with fed laws
2. Also said the CANT enforce fed law within their borders
Meaning: black robes said the only thing a state can do is ignore non-enforcement of fed law. That's the only choice they have been left with.
1. They don't HAVE to assist feds with fed laws
2. Also said the CANT enforce fed law within their borders
Meaning: black robes said the only thing a state can do is ignore non-enforcement of fed law. That's the only choice they have been left with.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:21 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:24 pm to I20goon
quote:
Courts said:
1. They don't HAVE to assist feds with fed laws
But they still have to enforce state law. That’s the oath that they swore to.
They are NOT allowed to just sit idly by while violent mobs riot and attack ICE agents. That's dereliction of duty and perhaps violating the civil rights of those ICE agents.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:27 pm to OysterPoBoy
and just like that conservatives everywhere have carve outs for the 2nd also
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:37 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
and pro 2A.
I think they've always supported guns, they just have always wanted to be the only people that have them.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:44 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Shorter lines at the ER.
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:52 pm to MMauler
quote:True. And I'd say the same for the Feds who choose not to enforce law.
But they still have to enforce state law. That’s the oath that they swore to.
They are NOT allowed to just sit idly by while violent mobs riot and attack ICE agents. That's dereliction of duty and perhaps violating the civil rights of those ICE agents.
But how do you do that when the political power in a state are the agitators refusing to help with fed law and refusing to enforce laws against those who help them?
The politicians have turned "who polices the police" on it's head. Who enforces the laws when the law givers, including judiciary, is in on breaking the law.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News