- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Inb4 fake video, DHS says there’s body cam footage of Pretti shooting
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:51 pm
quote:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said multiple Customs and Border Protection officers were wearing body cameras during the fatal shooting of protester Alex Pretti on Saturday in Minneapolis.
Camera footage from various angles is being reviewed by investigators, a DHS official told The Hill’s partner network NewsNation.
LINK
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:54 pm to Jbird
quote:Show me this quote in that article.
DHS says there’s body cam footage of Pretti shooting
ETA: I mistakenly thought the headline read that he fired a shot.
This post was edited on 1/26/26 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:55 pm to Houag80
quote:Do you see DHS saying the guy got hold of his pistol and shot first?
Whale, whale, whale
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:56 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
quote: DHS says there’s body cam footage of Pretti shooting Show me this quote in that article
Clearly he means footage of the shooting of Pretti.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:56 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Show me this quote in that article.
It is quite literally the headline.

Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:57 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
It is quite literally the headline.
Then it's very odd that the same statement wasn't also made in the body of the article don't you think?
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:57 pm to The Pirate King
quote:Directly from the frickin article even.
Clearly he means footage of the shooting of Pretti.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:57 pm to ReauxlTide222
I didn't read it. Get your accusatory finger out of my face before I bite it off. 
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:58 pm to Powerman
Well Power why don't you run to the Hill and straighten this shite out! 
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:59 pm to Jbird
thats because DHS isn't wearing body cams...no one should be shocked
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:59 pm to Powerman
First paragraph
quote:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said multiple Customs and Border Protection officers were wearing body cameras during the fatal shooting of protester Alex Pretti on Saturday in Minneapolis.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 12:59 pm to The Pirate King
quote:Oh frick me
Clearly he means footage of the shooting of Pretti.
I interpreted it as they have footage of him shooting first.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:00 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Oh frick me
I interpreted it as they have footage of him shooting first.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:00 pm to Powerman
quote:
Then it's very odd that the same statement wasn't also made in the body of the article don't you think?
It's a short article.
But, the following backs up the headline...
quote:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said multiple Customs and Border Protection officers were wearing body cameras during the fatal shooting of protester Alex Pretti on Saturday in Minneapolis.
Camera footage from various angles is being reviewed by investigators, a DHS official told The Hill’s partner network NewsNation.
They were wearing body cameras during the shooting of Pretti. They are reviewing that footage.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:01 pm to Houag80
quote:No worries, I misinterpreted the headline.
I didn't read it
quote:
Get your accusatory finger out of my face before I bite it off.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:02 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Get your accusatory finger out of my face before I bite it off.
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:03 pm to Jbird
I think you implying this article is saying something it isn’t
Posted on 1/26/26 at 1:04 pm to Powerman
quote:
Then it's very odd that the same statement wasn't also made in the body of the article don't you think?
fricking far right-wing rag The Hill at it again.
Popular
Back to top

7










