- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme Court Orders CA Dems To Justify Prop 50 Maps
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:50 pm
quote:
The Supreme Court’s request for a response puts California Democrats’ new congressional map in limbo as Republicans argue it amounts to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
This is certainly forecasting what is about to happen with the racially gerrymandered districts all over the country that will soon be ruled unconstitutional.
IT WILL BE GLORIOUS!!
Dems In A PICKLE Now!!
10
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:50 pm to Timeoday
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:52 pm to Timeoday
I sure hope so.
Now THAT would be winning!
Now THAT would be winning!
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:52 pm to Timeoday
Excellent.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:56 pm to Timeoday
SFP will not be amused. Sounds like another night of cheese puffs and porn for our esteemed lake Charles wanna be. I predict him waking up with an orange dick and a hangover.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 7:59 pm to Timeoday
Lol @ SFP
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:01 pm to Timeoday
This is good news; however, the dems will become desperate and pick another couple of states to join MN and act the fool. I'm guessing CA & IL.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:01 pm to Timeoday
Don’t celebrate yet, we’ll see. From the article:
“The request for a response is just that, however. The Supreme Court could still decline to take up the case. The high court is already deliberating over a voting rights case in Louisiana, the decision in which could impact its decision on the California map. In October, arguments concluded in a landmark voting rights case, Louisiana v. Callais, that will determine whether Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map, which includes a second majority black district, is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. A high court decision is expected any day.”
“The request for a response is just that, however. The Supreme Court could still decline to take up the case. The high court is already deliberating over a voting rights case in Louisiana, the decision in which could impact its decision on the California map. In October, arguments concluded in a landmark voting rights case, Louisiana v. Callais, that will determine whether Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map, which includes a second majority black district, is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. A high court decision is expected any day.”
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:01 pm to Timeoday
I’m shocked that Kagan asked for this.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:02 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Lol @ SFP
Have I ever even commented on CA's prop 50 maps?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:03 pm to Houag80
I think they’re already trying to redistrict in IL
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
I will have AI investigate the SFP log in the TD politalk database and let you know.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:06 pm to Houag80
There may have been a tangential reference in a general gerrymandering discussion, but I doubt there is anything substantive or opinionated.
That's california bullshite.
That's california bullshite.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:08 pm to LordSaintly
Exactly. Which is why I feel the racial gerrymandered districts are about to come undone. They have to be unconstitutional. Kagan obviously knows which direction the SCOTUS is going.
Even if they do not accept this, the upcoming SCOTUS decision will remove it.
Even if they do not accept this, the upcoming SCOTUS decision will remove it.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
The three liberal justices will consistently apply their reasoning from the Texas case and find this to violate the voter rights act.
The conservative justices will flip their reasoning for no coherent reason and the new maps will be thrown out.
The conservative justices will flip their reasoning for no coherent reason and the new maps will be thrown out.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There may have been a tangential reference in a general gerrymandering discussion, but I doubt there is anything substantive or opinionated.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:14 pm to Timeoday
quote:
IT WILL BE GLORIOUS!!
Dems In A PICKLE Now!!
You act as if Republicans aren't equally as guilty of gerrymandering the frick out of states too.
Hell, Indiana Republicans were condemned to hell by MAGA for refusing to gerrymander the frick out of the state like Trump wanted
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:15 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
You act as if Republicans aren't equally as guilty of gerrymandering the frick out of states too. Hell, Indiana Republicans were condemned to hell by MAGA for refusing to gerrymander the frick out of the state like Trump wanted
You just gave an example where Republicans did not gerrymander. Not a good point on your end.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:16 pm to Stidham8
quote:
You just gave an example where Republicans did not gerrymander. Not a good point on your end.
You missed the part about tCult condemning them for it.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 8:17 pm to TigerFanatic99
I think you're missing his point, your point, you have negative points
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News