What's happening in MN is criminal!

At the end, I will put court rulings.

So I am going to lay it out step by step for you.

- Walz called for people to take to the streets.
- His campaign strategist begins organizing via Signal.
- The LT Gov becomes an Admin for this Signal group.
- A state Sen gives details on locations and tactics of ICE
- Another Dem creates a data base to DOX ICE.

As a reporter noted, this is massively organized.

- The resistance begins training people to confront ICE
- They begin attacking ICE
- They start impeding their movements.
- AND WALZ continues to advocate for more.

- ANTIFA "General" of Mn calls on people to shot ICE after.....
- AG states that people can shoot ICE under "stand your Ground" laws.

- The misson begins to go after ICE (btw.. it's all documented).
- Lady runs over ICE agent causing 36 stitches.
- Lady runs over ICE causing internal bleeding and she is shot and died.

- WALZ goes public again calling for more of it. States ICE is not LEO.

- Attacks increase on ICE.
- Mn PD is over ran and retreats. Walz blames ICE.

- Guy shows up to a LEO enforcement by USING Signal. He directs traffic and is involved.
- He approaches ICE/BP.
- Guy attempts to intervene in a situation and is taken down to the ground.
- Video proves that an agent yells GUN GUN... a shot goes off, a brief pause and then more shots fired.

First and foremost, laws prohibit the behavior of the Gov and the people on the streets. You do not have the right to impede or remotely obstruct LEO enforcement. PERIOD.

More so, the SCOTUS has long ruled.

In cases where an officer uses deadly force, Graham v. Connor remains the foundational standard. The Supreme Court ruled that an officer's actions must be judged from the perspective of a "reasonable officer on the scene," not with the "20/20 vision of hindsight."

If a reasonable agent in 2026 fears "doxing" or physical retaliation because a governor has told citizens to "get in their faces," the law allows that agent to take protective measures to protect themselves.

All that matters is whether the objective facts of the situation—such as a hostile crowd or a public call for resistance. Walz calling ICE agents "Gestapo" and urging citizens to "witness" and "resist," Walz is attempting to frame the agents' actions as a violation of civil rights and that created a dangerous environment.

That ruling was just used and the SCOTUS reaffirmed it and EXPANDED it:

Barnes v. Felix.

Supreme Court struck down the "moment-of-threat" rule. Previously, some courts only looked at the exact second a shot was fired or a mask was worn.

Now, courts must look at the "totality of the circumstances" leading up to the event.

Go back to the top and read it again. The totality of the circumstances. The leadership there created this environment.

This is the ONLY state where this is happening and it's not near the amount of activity there as in other states by ICE.

This is all on the leadership of MN.