Started By
Message

Where is Judge BoASSberg as Mamdoni signs executive orders?

Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:11 pm
Posted by GatorOnAnIsland
Florida
Member since Jan 2019
9482 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:11 pm




Isn’t this judges’ job to declare all executive orders as unconstitutional?

Mamdani’s first executive order reads, "All Executive Orders issued on or after September 26, 2024, and in effect on December 31, 2025, are hereby revoked."

"That was a date that marked a moment when many New Yorkers decided politics held nothing for them," Mamdani said.

Mamdani on Thursday also signed three executive orders regarding New York City's housing crisis. Two of the orders establish task forces to speed up housing developments.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
18220 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by TheOcean
#honeyfriedchicken
Member since Aug 2004
45229 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:15 pm to
Task force...aka stealing taxpayer money
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 3:16 pm
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22063 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:27 pm to
he'd blow mamdani
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84598 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:47 pm to
My god
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
9185 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

My god


It's entertaining at least:)
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35879 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:30 pm to
Why (or how) would a federal district judge in DC be involved in executive orders signed by the mayor of NYC?
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 4:37 pm
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
9185 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

Why would a federal judge be involved in executive orders signed by the mayor of NYC?


Stop...he's on a roll. Next you're going to tell him that someone with standing actually has to file something challenging the EOs before a judge could do anything.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
21929 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

Why (or how) would a federal district judge in DC be involved in executive orders signed by the mayor of NYC
why would a district court judge in dc be ordering air force planes to turn around in mid air?
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 5:25 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467742 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Isn’t this judges’ job to declare all executive orders as unconstitutional?

Mamdani’s first executive order reads, "All Executive Orders issued on or after September 26, 2024, and in effect on December 31, 2025, are hereby revoked."


Serious question: are you retarded?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
46591 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

Where is Judge BoASSberg as Mamdoni signs executive orders?


They're on the same team.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467742 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

why would a district court judge in dc be ordering air force planes to turn around in mid air?


The DC Circuit Court has jurisdiction over federal agency action.

The actions around the plane were federal agency actions.
This post was edited on 1/2/26 at 5:33 pm
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
9185 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

why would a district court judge in dc be ordering air force planes to turn around in mid air?


Because he is an activist judge with a bad understanding of the Constitution, but at least there was a justiciable case over which he had jurisdiction.
Posted by DomincDecoco
RIP Ronnie fights Thoth’s loafers
Member since Oct 2018
11712 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

The DC Circuit Court has jurisdiction over federal agency action.


Nah
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467742 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Nah


quote:

Yes, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C. District Court) has significant jurisdiction over federal agency actions, often sharing or even holding exclusive jurisdiction for reviewing major agency decisions, especially those with national impact, though Congress decides which court gets direct review, sometimes granting it to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals instead. District courts generally handle federal cases, but specific statutes often funnel challenges to agency rules or actions directly to the D.C. Circuit due to its expertise in administrative law and Washington D.C.'s concentration of federal agencies.


Key Points:

General Jurisdiction: The D.C. District Court, like other federal district courts, has original jurisdiction over many federal civil and criminal cases.

Specialized Role: Because many federal agencies are headquartered in D.C., the D.C. District Court (and especially the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals) handles a disproportionate number of administrative law cases.

Congressional Delegation: Congress decides whether challenges to agency actions go to the district court (trial level) or directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (appellate level).

National Significance: Congress often grants exclusive jurisdiction to the D.C. Circuit for actions by independent agencies or matters with national effect, making it a central venue for administrative law.

In short, the D.C. District Court does hear cases involving federal agencies, but many significant agency actions are routed directly to the specialized D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals by federal statute.
Posted by DomincDecoco
RIP Ronnie fights Thoth’s loafers
Member since Oct 2018
11712 posts
Posted on 1/2/26 at 8:13 pm to
Nah
Posted by GatorOnAnIsland
Florida
Member since Jan 2019
9482 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:20 am to
quote:

Mamdani’s first executive order reads


quote:

Serious question: are you retarded?


No, but I believe you are.
This post was edited on 1/3/26 at 7:22 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
467742 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:50 am to
quote:

No, but I believe you are.


No I understand the difference in a state (well, city but that's a part of a state) and the federal government.

The question is why don't you?
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
18185 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:53 am to
The question was rhetorical you autistic dipshit.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8447 posts
Posted on 1/3/26 at 7:57 am to
He has local equivalents in NY.

I guess usurpation of Executive power is selective.

The Peoples Court never ruled against Hitler either.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram