Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Is there any software for detecting AI images

Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:06 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25223 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:06 pm
From Grok:


Is there any software for detecting AI images

Searching the web

60 results

Yes, there are numerous software tools and online services designed to detect AI-generated images (from models like Midjourney, DALL·E, Stable Diffusion, and others). These tools analyze pixel patterns, artifacts, noise distribution, metadata, and other subtle indicators left by AI generators.Popular AI Image Detection ToolsHere are some widely used and highly regarded options (as of late 2025):Winston AI — Often rated as one of the most accurate (claims over 98% accuracy in independent tests), detects images from major generators and identifies specific tools used.
Hive Moderation — Enterprise-level tool with high reported accuracy (e.g., near-perfect in some studies), includes a free browser extension and API for moderation.
AI or Not — Free tier available; quick and user-friendly for images, also supports text/audio/video; strong for NFT fraud and general verification.
Sightengine — API-based for scale; detects AI media with real-time analysis.
WasItAI — Browser-based, no install needed; instant results.
Illuminarty — Free checks with probability scores; also handles text.
Content at Scale (now BrandWell) — Includes an image detector alongside text tools.
TrueMedia.org — Non-profit tool focused on deepfakes and political misinformation; combines multiple detectors for robust results (free for public/journalists).
Others like Decopy.ai, Undetectable.ai's detector, Hugging Face models, and Copyleaks.

Many are free for basic use, with paid plans for higher volume or API access.Limitations of These ToolsNo detector is 100% reliable. Common issues include:False positives/negatives ? Real photos (especially edited ones) flagged as AI, or advanced/heavily edited AI images passing as real.
Evasion techniques ? Cropping, resizing, compressing, adding noise, or post-editing can fool detectors.
Rapid evolution ? New AI generators (or updates) often outpace detectors temporarily.
Generalization problems ? Tools trained on older models struggle with unseen ones.
Independent tests (e.g., benchmarks) show many perform inconsistently, sometimes no better than chance on challenging images.

Always cross-check with multiple tools and use human judgment—detectors are helpful aids, not definitive proof. For critical uses (e.g., journalism or fraud prevention), combine them with manual forensic analysis.

Posted by yaboidarrell
westbank
Member since Feb 2017
6345 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:11 pm to
There’s definitely an AI tool out there for this.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25223 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:16 pm to
It is needed these days. Some of the deep fakes are very hard to tell from real. Not long ago, they were easy enough to detect. No so much now.
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
15876 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 4:21 pm to
If I remember right, Texas recently passed a law making it illegal to use AI to make distasteful images of people. I guess manufacturing pornography with real life images of normal people using AI is a thing now. Pretty sad and disgusting.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
79278 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:29 pm to
Not sure if you did this on purpose to make some kind of meta statement on current life, but the irony is not lost on me that you posted a grok excerpt.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
22142 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:33 pm to
I don't know if this is some kind of troll thread, but Google's AI (Gemini) has added a feature where it can tell you if the image or video was made by Google AI. It adds some kind of hidden watermark to tell.

"AI detectors" for written work are largely bullshite.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26927 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:37 pm to
What is the point of this thread?
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35895 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Not long ago, they were easy enough to detect. No so much now.


They always used to struggle with hands but have seemed to figure those out.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12687 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 5:55 pm to
I’m not sure what’s going on with this thread (are you asking us or telling us?) but:

- Yes, there are tools that exist to try to detect AI-generated images.
- No, they aren’t particularly reliable (especially if the person creating the image takes even the bare minimum steps to obscure the fact that it’s AI-generated).

Detection tools for AI-generated text are even worse, but you can’t really trust any of them.
Posted by aubiecat
Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
5894 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Is there any software for detecting AI images

Grok. Just drop the image in chat and ask Grok to analyse it. It usually does a good job of catching AI images.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
35792 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 6:53 pm to
That question is almost as silly as falling for AI stuff.
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
8203 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 7:21 pm to
StableDiffusion image generators store the Metadata used to create png images in human readable text as the first line of the file which can be read by any text editor. Should show the model, prompts, and other parameters used.

Others probably do the same....
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78258 posts
Posted on 12/29/25 at 8:31 pm to
Just assume everything is bullshite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram