- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Epstein Files: In 2019, DOJ knew of co-conspirators in ADDITION to Epstein and Maxwell
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 12/25/25 at 4:59 pm
I had believed the DOJ July Memorandum that said there wasn't anything in the Epstein files that justified additional charges. That might be true, but the DOJ has some explaining to do.
Turns out that the DOJ themselves referred to TEN other co-conspirators other than Epstein and Maxwell. At Maxwell's trial, they informed the Court that they might refer to two people other than Epstein as being her co-conspirators.
If you want to hear the details, watch this 11:24 video (see screenshots in comments that follow in this thread):
Turns out that the DOJ themselves referred to TEN other co-conspirators other than Epstein and Maxwell. At Maxwell's trial, they informed the Court that they might refer to two people other than Epstein as being her co-conspirators.
If you want to hear the details, watch this 11:24 video (see screenshots in comments that follow in this thread):
This post was edited on 12/25/25 at 6:33 pm
7
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:02 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Here's the DOJ referring to the other TEN co-conspirators:
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:06 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Here's the DOJ in Maxwell's case informing the court that they might refer to two people OTHER than Epstein as co-conspirators with Maxwell:
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Of course, this doesn't implicate Trump in the least. It DOES suggest the DOJ is covering for some people.
The redactions allowed under the Massie law don't protect people (other than victims) from embarrassment. Obviously, DOJ considered these people to be co-conspirators at some point.
Where are the documents explaining why the co-conspirators weren't charged? Wouldn't they be in the same files? Genuine questions...which I doubt we'll ever hear answers to unless the Dems win the mid-terms. I want Epstein transparency, but not that badly.
The redactions allowed under the Massie law don't protect people (other than victims) from embarrassment. Obviously, DOJ considered these people to be co-conspirators at some point.
Where are the documents explaining why the co-conspirators weren't charged? Wouldn't they be in the same files? Genuine questions...which I doubt we'll ever hear answers to unless the Dems win the mid-terms. I want Epstein transparency, but not that badly.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:18 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Reminder: Trump was president and head of the DOJ then
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:20 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Reminder: Trump was president and head of the DOJ then
Another reminder: He was the one to finally prosecute Epstein and Maxwell after years of inaction by the Dems.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:23 pm to IvoryBillMatt
If there was anything damning to Trump it would've surfaced in the 2016 Election and at the latest the 2024 Election
So far all we have is wild speculation, gross exaggeration, politically motivated accusations, and a classic "come on bro, you know what he meant" comments
What we know:
1) Trump was the only person who knew Epstein that voluntarily spoke with Palm Beach PD and cooperated with law enforcement
2) Trump banned Epstein from his property for inappropriate behavior long before he was arrested
3) The only victim that placed him with Epstein said he never touched her, propositioned her, or behave inappropriately at all
So far all we have is wild speculation, gross exaggeration, politically motivated accusations, and a classic "come on bro, you know what he meant" comments
What we know:
1) Trump was the only person who knew Epstein that voluntarily spoke with Palm Beach PD and cooperated with law enforcement
2) Trump banned Epstein from his property for inappropriate behavior long before he was arrested
3) The only victim that placed him with Epstein said he never touched her, propositioned her, or behave inappropriately at all
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:27 pm to BlueFalcon
Unless Trump cut a deal as well. We are going off the notion that Trump is an outsider primed to wreck the system. Has he? Is he? Doesn’t seem like it.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:29 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
Another reminder: He was the one to finally prosecute Epstein and Maxwell after years of inaction by the Dems.
Yup. And the Administration to put out massive information about Epstein (compared to any other).
No one yet knows WHY there's a cover-up. I doubt we ever will.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:31 pm to BlueFalcon
quote:
If there was anything damning to Trump it would've surfaced in the 2016 Election and at the latest the 2024 Election
So far all we have is wild speculation, gross exaggeration, politically motivated accusations, and a classic "come on bro, you know what he meant" comments
What we know:
1) Trump was the only person who knew Epstein that voluntarily spoke with Palm Beach PD and cooperated with law enforcement
2) Trump banned Epstein from his property for inappropriate behavior long before he was arrested
3) The only victim that placed him with Epstein said he never touched her, propositioned her, or behave inappropriately at all
I agree with all of that. It makes the cover-up all the more baffling.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:35 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Of the 4 downvotes, my guess is ZERO watched the video.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:38 pm to Richleau
quote:
We are going off the notion that Trump is an outsider primed to wreck the system
Anyone that still thinks this is a lunatic
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:48 pm to SloaneRanger
Another Reminder: theunknownknight DID NOT KNOW THIS. None of them do because they are all a bunch of fricking losers.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:54 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The walls are closing in when coffeezilla is on your trail
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:57 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
The walls are closing in when coffeezilla is on your trail
Certainly more of a threat to the Deep State than is Bondi's DOJ.
Posted on 12/25/25 at 5:59 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
The walls are closing in when coffeezilla is on your trail
What did you think was factually incorrect in the video?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 6:02 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Bondi is a disgrace
Posted on 12/25/25 at 6:07 pm to Powerman
Who on earth would hire her?
Posted on 12/25/25 at 6:08 pm to IvoryBillMatt
I wouldn’t say it’s factually correct or incorrect. I would say it’s not a source that I, personally, would rely upon to make any conclusions, full stop. In fact, I, again personally, would not make any sweeping conclusions without seeing the whole of what the decision makers saw, thus full context. JMO
Posted on 12/25/25 at 6:31 pm to davyjones
quote:
I wouldn’t say it’s factually correct or incorrect. I would say it’s not a source that I, personally, would rely upon to make any conclusions,
Good points. As I mentioned, there might be good explanations for why the DOJ didn't prosecute people they labeled as co-conspirators.
It does show though that the DOJ is redacting names for a reason specifically excluded by the Massie law: to avoid embarrassment of potential suspects.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News