- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Some redacted text in the Epstein files can be read when highlighted
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:43 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
The blackout text in Epstein's documents turned out to be easily readable.
In some files of the scandalous financier's case, you can read everything that the US Department of Justice tried to obscure, journalists noticed. If you simply select the "censored" blocks, the text is copied from them.
The fact is that during editing, they presumably blacked out the background of the text, not the letters themselves. In many hidden parts of the files, attempts were made to remove information about money movements and specific amounts, as well as details related to the financier's lawyer, Darren Indyke.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 1:44 pm
21
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:44 pm to hawgfaninc
Jesus H.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:46 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
The blackout text in Epstein's documents turned out to be easily readable.
That's not true, I tried that on several of the documents.
There were a couple cases where there was a case ID embedded, but if anyone claims this is true, link to the justice.gov link, and then say what to copy paste.
This is obvious Russian disinformation.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:46 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:47 pm to Narax
Wouldn’t mind being proven wrong here
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:50 pm to hawgfaninc
lulz
It shouldn't be redacted anyway. Good job Bondi! This one might very well trump the binders in embarrassment
It shouldn't be redacted anyway. Good job Bondi! This one might very well trump the binders in embarrassment
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:50 pm to hawgfaninc
Seems like this would have been discovered a while ago if it was applicable to a large number of docs?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:51 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Wouldn’t mind being proven wrong here
On the fake callers post I copy and pasted pdfs.
Nothing came out except an iii and a case number from blocked out text.
If they want to post a direct link to one at the justice site we could all try it.
But I would not trust a document not from the justice website, its very easy to modify and resave pdfs.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:53 pm to hawgfaninc
And? Is this the new outrage and what great information was discovered?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:17 pm to hawgfaninc
How could they frick up something so simple? How did no one think of this?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:19 pm to Narax
quote:
That's not true, I tried that on several of the documents.
It’s been reported that it’s only on some of the documents. Definitely not the majority.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:21 pm to hawgfaninc
Hate to be that guy but didn't "Q" demonstrate this 6 or so years ago.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:23 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Now, it’s illegal for you to read this text. It’s different for us in the media…
- cnn
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:29 pm to Narax
Dude i saw it on tik tok, its totes real
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:31 pm to hawgfaninc
... I was wondering if this would happen
again
and
it
did
Fun times ...
anons already knew
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:37 pm to bayou2
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:39 pm to hawgfaninc
Now we know! Trump killed Epstein.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News