Joel Klatt: The NCAA basketball tournament is the "dumbest tournament in all of sports"

Scorching retarded take maybe.

March madness is about entertainment and money, not being the most fair way to crown a champion.

quote:

---

Joel Klatt: The NCAA basketball tournament is the "dumbest tournament in all of sports"

---

In some ways he's right. In other ways he's dead wrong.

I think people love Cinderella the first 4 days of the tourney. However, that often paves the way for 30 point wins by 1 seeds over some random 13 seed who makes it through and everyone loves the first weekend.

So everyone loves a 13 beating a 4 and then knocking off a 5, but that often leads to terrible blowouts later in the tournament making the 16/8 not as good as it could be

hes 100% right.

March Madness is entertaining for casuals or those who just want to watch games and pull for upsets because it’s fun and they have brackets/money on the line.

If you actually are a fan of a basketball team and care about it and the season, its one of the most frustrating/dumbest things about the sport

as a fan you invest all this time and energy into a team over the course of 4 months…yo through a conference slate…then a conference tournament…then await your seeding.

then you get shipped to god knows where and play a single elimination tournament in a sport where refs suck arse and any random game can see your best player get in foul trouble or the underdog team gets key free throws to keep them in a game and your season is over in the blink of an eye.

and the structure itself is wonky…you get a week to prepare for first team in your bracket, then one day to prepare for team 2, then a week for team 3, one day for team four

basketball is not a sport that should be played as a single game.

but again, everything above is great as a casual fan who just wants to take off work drink beer and watch the chaos and carnage

quote:

---

We go, and we put teams at odd times on neutral sites in a one-game affair. That doesn’t crown a true champion. We’re not doing anything that tells us who’s the best team over the course of the entire season.”

---

I DON'T care.

That's the rub, Joel! Especially to college football -- I do not care about the "true" champion.

Because there isn't one. Ever. If we were crowning "true" champions, the 2007 Patriots would have a ring. The 2014-2015 Kentucky basketball team would have cut down the nets.

Sports are fun because they are a game, and the game has a built in system that every team goes through. Some games and systems are more fun than others. The NCAA college basketball system is one of the most fun postseasons in all of sports. If you want to complete the game, win the game, hoist the trophy, you have to win that system.

College football pretty much used to ignore the idea of a champion. You played your rivalry teams, competed for your conference, and were rewarded with a nice trip for a bowl game. Some of the bowl games had deep traditional meaning with cultural impact. Those were the games you really wanted to get into! But as we're seeing, trying to crown a "true" champion doesn't work. There are always holes in the arguments and always kinks in the system.

You might say the NBA and MLB have the best systems for crowning a "true" champion with having to win a best of seven.

He’s loading up on the awful takes lately. His PR team must be asking him to generate clicks.

I legitimately wouldn’t watch a single second of the ncaa basketball tournament if it was just the power programs.

I won’t watch a single college basketball all season, but I’ll tune into a couple tournament games. Especially early rounds.

Joel Klatt can suck on a hairy one.

This feels like it’s being said in jest relative to the CFB playoffs, but I think he’s serious.

The tournament has at least the 40 best teams in it every year & somehow we usually get the top 4-8 playing in the end. What a retarded take

quote:

---

Every league should have 2 guaranteed slots, regular season champ and tourney champ.

---

There are 31 conferences in D1, so that'd be 62 AQ's (at most) which would be a bit ridiculous. I don't hate it in theory, but it'd just never happen especially with how logjammed the P4 conferences are now.