The lack of in-depth media coverage of this shooting is strange, bordering on suspicious.

There were AT LEAST 20 eyewitnesses in the classroom where the gunman burst in, "screamed something," and then waited several seconds before he started shooting. Surely everyone in the classroom would have gotten a good look at the murderer. Are they being told not to speak to the media?

There STILL hasn't been a physical description of the shooter released other than "a male, possibly in his 30s, wearing dark clothing." Maybe some witnesses are reluctant to speak publicly out of fear. BUT, surely they have given interviews to the authorities. For help in finding the perp, wouldn't the authorities release a description based on those interviews?

The ONLY eyewitness interview I could find (hopefully, someone else can find others) was this sketchy one with CNN. The witness was the Teaching Assistant who was just wrapping up the economics exam review when the students were shot.

Not surprisingly, Dana Bash seems more interested in pushing the gun control narrative than getting the facts. She seems to know beforehand that she is not supposed to ask the witness some obvious questions or ANY follow up questions.

If you're interested in the case, please watch this ten-minute interview and let us know what you think. Do you think it’s possible that the authorities and the MSM aren't THAT motivated to find the killer? I thought that about the J6 pipe "bomber," but I have a hard time thinking that would be done in this tragic case with actual victims.

What stood out for me in the interview was:
-They heard what sounded like gunshots and screams OUTSIDE the classroom a few seconds before the gunman entered. That contradicts all other reports
-The classroom was an auditorium. The T.A. was in the front. The shooter entered all the way across the auditorium from him at the back.
-At the 2:15 mark on this video, the T.A. said that the perp entered through the back and ... "He screamed something. I don't know what he said. None of the other students heard what he said."
-We don't know how many students were in the room (great reporting!), it's a safe bet that many students were much closer to the gunman when he "screamed." I guarantee SOMEONE heard what he "screamed." I doubt that this T.A. actually confirmed with all the other students that they didn't hear what the gunmen "screamed."
-Of course, Bash doesn't ask "Was the gunman speaking English? Could he have said something like 'Allahu Akbar?' Was he screaming at anyone in particular, or just at the whole auditorium generally?"
-Bash goes through most of the interview with fluff questions. She doesn't ask, "I know it's tough, but as to the two students who didn't make it, where were they in relation to you?"
-Near the very end, she asks THE question that should have been the first....
- at the 9:04 mark
"Q: I know it was a blur, but do you have any memory of what the shooter looked like? [Weird phrasing]
A: No, I just remember the facts that I told the detectives, but I just want to make sure that they have the confidentiality when it comes to identifying the shooter, so I have no information to that status at this point."
-Bash seemed to know that she couldn't press the witness. Otherwise she would have said: "You said you locked eyes with him. You can't tell us anything? Are you sure it was a man? Was he White, Black, Hispanic, Middle Eastern, Asian? Tall, short, skinny, fat? Student-aged or older? Facial hair? What was he wearing? Did he have a hat, gloves, or glasses?"
-Finally, she asks if he saw the gun. Obviously, he did, became he refers to the murderer "pointing his gun" at the beginning of the interview. Instead of answering the question though, he just says "I saw some things I wish I hadn't."
-MAYBE there's some investigatory reason not to disclose that information to the public...but wouldn't that be outweighed by alerting the public to what type of gun the perp used to assist in identifying him?
-This can't be mere incompetence, there's some frickery at play.
-Thanks for reading this wall of text.