- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This is the most non-controversial "controversy" of all time
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:31 pm
Notre Dame has absolutely no legitimate argument whatsoever.
Alabama's metrics on paper are light years better.
Notre Dame and Miamis metrics are virtually identical but Miami beat them.
So what exactly is this supposed controversy?
With these three teams and two spots I think it's completely clear-cut.
The committee created this fake controversy by having Notre Dame slightly too high the entire back half of the season.
Alabama's metrics on paper are light years better.
Notre Dame and Miamis metrics are virtually identical but Miami beat them.
So what exactly is this supposed controversy?
With these three teams and two spots I think it's completely clear-cut.
The committee created this fake controversy by having Notre Dame slightly too high the entire back half of the season.
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:32 pm to StansberryRules
You are right but your on a LSU board.
And I hate bama more than all of them
And I hate bama more than all of them
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:33 pm to StansberryRules
The committee got it right.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:34 pm to StansberryRules
Metrics vs Eye Test
I remember when we wanted the best teams in
Notre Dame is better than Bama
I remember when we wanted the best teams in
Notre Dame is better than Bama
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:35 pm to LanierSpots
Just look at it as an opportunity to watch us get creamed again
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:37 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
Alabama's metrics on paper are light years better.
Notre Dame would beat the frick out of y’all lol.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:37 pm to StansberryRules
Alabama has three losses, two of them ugly. The books were cooked with SEC bias to make sure they got in. frick Alabama.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:39 pm to StansberryRules
My complaint is JMU
They are taking up a spot that should have gone to a legit contender
JMU and Tulane are going to get beat by 30 apiece
They are taking up a spot that should have gone to a legit contender
JMU and Tulane are going to get beat by 30 apiece
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:41 pm to TigersHuskers
I’ll see your frick Bama and raise you a frick ND Right In Their fricking Face
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:42 pm to Roaad
JMU did what they needed to do. Don’t blame them, blame the format
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:43 pm to Chris_topher
You THINK they’re better than Alabama.
I am curious if Notre Dame played Alabama’s regular season schedule how many people think they would have gone 10-2
I am curious if Notre Dame played Alabama’s regular season schedule how many people think they would have gone 10-2
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:43 pm to DaleGribblesMower
quote:I'm not
Don’t blame them
quote:I am
blame the format
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:44 pm to LanierSpots
I hate Alabama more than I hate the flu. And the committee got it right. ND has not won in anything in 40 fricking years and they continue to be treated like royalty. Absolute nobodies and they have lived off weak scheduling.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:44 pm to Roaad
Bama has a loss to a shite team.
Bama's big win is Georgia but yesterday showed that meant nothing.
Throwing out the Georgia win, both teams have a win over a team rated 10-20. So they're basically even.
ND should be in based on Bama getting beat badly by FSU.
Bama's big win is Georgia but yesterday showed that meant nothing.
Throwing out the Georgia win, both teams have a win over a team rated 10-20. So they're basically even.
ND should be in based on Bama getting beat badly by FSU.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:45 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
Alabama's metrics on paper are light years better.
The issue most people have with this, is that if it were any other team, that team would have been left out.
Bama 100% got in because they are Alabama.
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:45 pm to Diseasefreeforall
By your logic ND should be out based on losing to Miami (who sucks) and Aggie at home who lost to Texas. Right?
Posted on 12/7/25 at 2:45 pm to Diseasefreeforall
quote:Have you perused ND's losses?
ND should be in based on Bama getting beat badly by FSU.
Better losses, but no wins that trump UGA, or even Vandy
This post was edited on 12/7/25 at 2:50 pm
Back to top

10











