Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why does everyone have Oregon ranked over Ole Miss?

Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:28 pm
Posted by LSUguy2023
St. George
Member since Oct 2021
2982 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:28 pm
If my math is correct, Ole Miss has two wins over playoff teams, and Oregon has zero wins over playoff teams
Posted by The Tiger322
Member since Dec 2019
2757 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:29 pm to
Keeping the same relative ranking as before. No real reason to switch them unless matchup purposes. UGA beat Ole Miss by 7 at UGA, Indiana beat Oregon by 10 at Oregon could be a data point but eh its pretty negligible.
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm
Posted by GeauxPanthers2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Dec 2024
1317 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm to
Both Oregon and Ole Miss' only losses became conference champions today.

Maybe if Indiana lost you could have argued Ole Miss to jump Oregon, but I don't see a reason they would do it now... unless they really want to avoid a Tulane/Ole Miss rematch.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
10311 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm to
quote:

Keeping the same relative ranking as before. No real reason to switch them unless matchup purposes.


I don't think we jump Oregon. But the argument would be that Tulane's win Friday is worth enough to move us up even while idol. Before this weekend, we had only beaten one playoff team.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
13425 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm to
Oregon’s SOR is better. I know this is tough to understand SEC fan
Posted by TigerFan91
:red:
Member since Jan 2005
30606 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:32 pm to
Bigger question, it’s horseshite Oklahoma is guaranteed in they are dogshit
Posted by The Tiger322
Member since Dec 2019
2757 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:32 pm to
Fair point, but to counter that I bet they would bring up the chance in coaching staff. I agree though I dont they swap unless they had them that close but I doubt that.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
13425 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:33 pm to
Tulane being a playoff team matters not
Posted by dhuck20
SCLSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
22956 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Oregon’s SOR is better. I know this is tough to understand SEC fan
Thats the metric that has BYU ahead of Texas Tech right?
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29017 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:37 pm to
CFB has 2 major issues. One is everyone just sorta expected Oregon to be a great team this year and not many expected OM to be. This leads to high preseason rankings and the thought of "I mean yeah Oregon lost to an undefeated Indiana." We still don't know if Oregon is that great, but they only have one loss and it's to the #1 overall.

The same is true in inverse. It's why the committee has such circular logic. They say they reward harder schedules but they kinda don't unless they want to. They generally revert to preseason rankings which are largely "yeah they were good last year, got some dudes, shouldn't drop off much."

Which leans into the second issue...unbalanced schedules. Oregon avoided Michigan and OSU this year. Lost to Indiana. Scraped by Iowa. Ole miss missed Bama, played UGA tight, beat OU. UF and LSU kinda sucked. With these massive conferences, teams can't control their schedule a ton.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
13425 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:38 pm to
Probably not anymore lol.
Posted by Rrrrroger
Member since Mar 2021
1060 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:44 pm to
Because they were ranked ahead in the preseason poll
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61287 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

CFB has 2 major issues. One is everyone just sorta expected Oregon to be a great team this year and not many expected OM to be. This leads to high preseason rankings and the thought of "I mean yeah Oregon lost to an undefeated Indiana." We still don't know if Oregon is that great, but they only have one loss and it's to the #1 overall.

The same is true in inverse. It's why the committee has such circular logic. They say they reward harder schedules but they kinda don't unless they want to. They generally revert to preseason rankings which are largely "yeah they were good last year, got some dudes, shouldn't drop off much."

Which leans into the second issue...unbalanced schedules. Oregon avoided Michigan and OSU this year. Lost to Indiana. Scraped by Iowa. Ole miss missed Bama, played UGA tight, beat OU. UF and LSU kinda sucked. With these massive conferences, teams can't control their schedule a ton.


This is why you have to set it all up like FCS. Conference winners are in and basically the rest of the top 25 makes it as well. It creates a no nonsense setup where everyone has a chance and the odds of any worthwhile team getting left our are so minute that there just wouldn't be that much hand wringing.


Of course I'm sure what will really happen is the ACC teams will massively overreact to a fluke occurrence of 5 teams all being tied for 2nd and the team w/the worst record somehow winning out.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39012 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

Both Oregon and Ole Miss' only losses became conference champions today.


But only Oregon lost to undisputed #1...so, what's the argument for Ole Miss again?
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
13425 posts
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:50 pm to
Ole Miss also lost their coach. This a thought experiment at this point
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram