- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why does everyone have Oregon ranked over Ole Miss?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:28 pm
If my math is correct, Ole Miss has two wins over playoff teams, and Oregon has zero wins over playoff teams
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:29 pm to LSUguy2023
Keeping the same relative ranking as before. No real reason to switch them unless matchup purposes. UGA beat Ole Miss by 7 at UGA, Indiana beat Oregon by 10 at Oregon could be a data point but eh its pretty negligible.
This post was edited on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm to LSUguy2023
Both Oregon and Ole Miss' only losses became conference champions today.
Maybe if Indiana lost you could have argued Ole Miss to jump Oregon, but I don't see a reason they would do it now... unless they really want to avoid a Tulane/Ole Miss rematch.
Maybe if Indiana lost you could have argued Ole Miss to jump Oregon, but I don't see a reason they would do it now... unless they really want to avoid a Tulane/Ole Miss rematch.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm to The Tiger322
quote:
Keeping the same relative ranking as before. No real reason to switch them unless matchup purposes.
I don't think we jump Oregon. But the argument would be that Tulane's win Friday is worth enough to move us up even while idol. Before this weekend, we had only beaten one playoff team.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:31 pm to LSUguy2023
Oregon’s SOR is better. I know this is tough to understand SEC fan
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:32 pm to LSUguy2023
Bigger question, it’s horseshite Oklahoma is guaranteed in they are dogshit
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:32 pm to OleVaught14
Fair point, but to counter that I bet they would bring up the chance in coaching staff. I agree though I dont they swap unless they had them that close but I doubt that.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:33 pm to OleVaught14
Tulane being a playoff team matters not
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:37 pm to bisonduck
quote:Thats the metric that has BYU ahead of Texas Tech right?
Oregon’s SOR is better. I know this is tough to understand SEC fan
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:37 pm to LSUguy2023
CFB has 2 major issues. One is everyone just sorta expected Oregon to be a great team this year and not many expected OM to be. This leads to high preseason rankings and the thought of "I mean yeah Oregon lost to an undefeated Indiana." We still don't know if Oregon is that great, but they only have one loss and it's to the #1 overall.
The same is true in inverse. It's why the committee has such circular logic. They say they reward harder schedules but they kinda don't unless they want to. They generally revert to preseason rankings which are largely "yeah they were good last year, got some dudes, shouldn't drop off much."
Which leans into the second issue...unbalanced schedules. Oregon avoided Michigan and OSU this year. Lost to Indiana. Scraped by Iowa. Ole miss missed Bama, played UGA tight, beat OU. UF and LSU kinda sucked. With these massive conferences, teams can't control their schedule a ton.
The same is true in inverse. It's why the committee has such circular logic. They say they reward harder schedules but they kinda don't unless they want to. They generally revert to preseason rankings which are largely "yeah they were good last year, got some dudes, shouldn't drop off much."
Which leans into the second issue...unbalanced schedules. Oregon avoided Michigan and OSU this year. Lost to Indiana. Scraped by Iowa. Ole miss missed Bama, played UGA tight, beat OU. UF and LSU kinda sucked. With these massive conferences, teams can't control their schedule a ton.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:44 pm to LSUguy2023
Because they were ranked ahead in the preseason poll
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:46 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
CFB has 2 major issues. One is everyone just sorta expected Oregon to be a great team this year and not many expected OM to be. This leads to high preseason rankings and the thought of "I mean yeah Oregon lost to an undefeated Indiana." We still don't know if Oregon is that great, but they only have one loss and it's to the #1 overall.
The same is true in inverse. It's why the committee has such circular logic. They say they reward harder schedules but they kinda don't unless they want to. They generally revert to preseason rankings which are largely "yeah they were good last year, got some dudes, shouldn't drop off much."
Which leans into the second issue...unbalanced schedules. Oregon avoided Michigan and OSU this year. Lost to Indiana. Scraped by Iowa. Ole miss missed Bama, played UGA tight, beat OU. UF and LSU kinda sucked. With these massive conferences, teams can't control their schedule a ton.
This is why you have to set it all up like FCS. Conference winners are in and basically the rest of the top 25 makes it as well. It creates a no nonsense setup where everyone has a chance and the odds of any worthwhile team getting left our are so minute that there just wouldn't be that much hand wringing.
Of course I'm sure what will really happen is the ACC teams will massively overreact to a fluke occurrence of 5 teams all being tied for 2nd and the team w/the worst record somehow winning out.
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:49 pm to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
Both Oregon and Ole Miss' only losses became conference champions today.
But only Oregon lost to undisputed #1...so, what's the argument for Ole Miss again?
Posted on 12/6/25 at 11:50 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Ole Miss also lost their coach. This a thought experiment at this point
Popular
Back to top
6










