Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2905
Registered on:12/7/2019
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
Its been said he doesnt mind sitting for a year behind Dante. I dont think hes signed yet but I would wager that he stays there and then starts next year.
Delane would be nice it its a DB, I think Delane is more probable than Wilson but it could be the mystery LB theyre targeting.
They could draft relatively well and get some players on their lines that will make a difference thus setting their future QB up for success rather than draft the QB and then the OT or Pass Rusher. Or they trade back from #2 like they should because realistically they can and they'd get more draft picks out of it.
QB2=Jets...and nobody wants to go the Jets
Me thinks its the LB from Southern Mississippi that was committed to Ole Miss
Tell me if im wrong but isnt it true that the strategy if they rule against him on this one is just to pick another law or statute that could/does give him the ability to levy tarriffs? Because again, correct me if im wrong, but this lawsuit isnt about whether or not the president has the authority to levy tarriffs but whether he has the authority to do so with the avenue he used?

re: Landen Clark gives update

Posted by The Tiger322 on 1/10/26 at 11:12 pm to
*he has no business demanding a starting job from LSU
I could have worded that better but personally if we dont get a definite starter like Leavitt, I think the best they will offer is a chance to start and compete.

re: Landen Clark gives update

Posted by The Tiger322 on 1/10/26 at 11:06 pm to
Why not? Longstreet has no business demanding a starting job considering he didnt play last year whereas Leavitt has started and would come in as the presumptive starter but also no doubt that Lane will play whomever wins the QB battle as shown by his willingness to stay with Chambliss even after Simmons got healthy. Its likely that we only sign one of Clark and Longstreet though.

re: Landen Clark gives update

Posted by The Tiger322 on 1/10/26 at 10:56 pm to
Michigan doesnt make sense, BU is going to be the starter there regardless, JMU works if he wants a guaranteed start but LSU and Kentucky are higher up and would let him compete at the very least with LSU being a better place than Kentucky and Michigan if hes alright with being a backup
I doubt it, Frazier is originally from out west so Oregon makes more sense than Ohio State especially since theyve got Bo Jackson, wouldve seen them probably go after other RBs too but theyve been silent on that front
Oh I agree, they shouldve won that game easily but terrible clock management and general decision making lost it but Jordan Love doesn't have the killer instinct to get it done and I think MLF tries to hide a lot of that, we will see though, Packers might resign Malik Willis and then things might get really interesting
Jordan Love is probably going to cost MLF his job which is fine because theyve got the 7 seed for like 4 or 5 straight years but I think Jordan Love loses his job shortly after because that dude is not a good QB
Probably wouldn't have won the superbowl after that but my gosh...they shouldve won this atleast
Bet they really wish they didnt call that TO right now
This might be worse for the bears, GB has to get a td and isnt going to settle for a FG and oh my gosh the packers cant catch a cold
Thats the Ohio State play from a few years ago I think, beautiful play
DJ Moore made up for it and me thinks they might have scored too early
Shouldn't have been the play call, youre trying to kill time so you run something like a screen if youre dead set on passing and then like mesh or a pick play