- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SCOTUS will hear Birthright Citizenship case
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:06 pm
24
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:07 pm to cajunandy
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:07 pm to cajunandy
Let’s Go!
Get these 3rd world sublets out of here.
Get these 3rd world sublets out of here.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:09 pm to cajunandy
Sadly think it will be 5-4 with roberts and barrett flipping because “feelings”
This post was edited on 12/5/25 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:09 pm to cajunandy
Calling it now… they side with the Administration.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:09 pm to Cosmo
ACB will be a problem
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:10 pm to cajunandy
5-4
Kagel, Roberts, Sotohag and Gazoontite Jackson dissent.
Kagel, Roberts, Sotohag and Gazoontite Jackson dissent.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:9-0 against Trump
Calling it now
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:12 pm to cajunandy
Until Congress steps in the executive branch should have full authority to define “jurisdiction”.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:13 pm to evil cockroach
Congress has to change the law.
9-0 against Trump on this one.
9-0 against Trump on this one.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:14 pm to cajunandy
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:14 pm to evil cockroach
They would not agree to hear it if that were the case. Someone is looking to abrogate Wong Kim Ark.
I’ll bet we get a Thomas majority opinion stating the 14th was only for slaves and not what we see today.
I’ll bet we get a Thomas majority opinion stating the 14th was only for slaves and not what we see today.
This post was edited on 12/5/25 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:14 pm to Sassafrasology
quote:
Until Congress steps in the executive branch should have full authority to define “jurisdiction”.
This makes, literally, no sense.
Apply this "logic" to the 2A or even 1A
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:15 pm to cajunandy
I don’t care how or why but please end it. We will be better off without. 
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:15 pm to cajunandy
I think birthright citizenship is a problem.
But I can't see how they overturn the precedent. They would have to overrule the original intent of the language, using the understanding at the time.
I guess you could use a "words on the paper" and those words change meaning over time type of argument. But that just slides us into judicial activism.
But I can't see how they overturn the precedent. They would have to overrule the original intent of the language, using the understanding at the time.
I guess you could use a "words on the paper" and those words change meaning over time type of argument. But that just slides us into judicial activism.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:15 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’ll bet we get a Thomas majority opinion stating it the 14th was only for slaves and not what we see today.
It would complete his journey abandoning textualism that he started during Trump 1
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:15 pm to retired_tiger
Weird way to announce you’re retarded.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:16 pm to BigJim
quote:
They would have to overrule the original intent of the language, using the understanding at the time.
Textualism
quote:
I guess you could use a "words on the paper" and those words change meaning over time type of argument.
"Living document" analysis
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:17 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’ll bet we get a Thomas majority opinion stating the 14th was only for slaves and not what we see today.
Which is mostly accurate.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:17 pm to cajunandy
This correlates with the dual citizenship issue.
If you were born on US soil but another nation recognizes you as their citizen, then you are subject to their jurisdiction not the US jurisdiction.
If you were born on US soil but another nation recognizes you as their citizen, then you are subject to their jurisdiction not the US jurisdiction.
Page 1 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News