- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SIAP: Jim Jordan slaps subpoena on Jack Smith.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:54 am
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:54 am
quote:
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, subpoenaed former special counsel Jack Smith on Wednesday for a deposition, escalating Republicans' investigation into one of President Donald Trump's top political foes.
quote:
Jordan directed Smith to appear before the committee on Dec. 17, according to a copy of the subpoena reviewed by Fox News Digital. "Due to your service as Special Counsel, the Committee believes that you possess information that is vital to its oversight of this matter," Jordan wrote in a letter accompanying his request.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jack-smith-subpoenaed-deposition-house-judiciary-committee
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:55 am to loogaroo
I'm sure Jim will write a sternly worded letter when Smith doesn't comply.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:55 am to loogaroo
Gonna be another no thank you, frick off I am not coming.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:56 am to loogaroo
Jack is ready for his public hearing.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:57 am to loogaroo
Jack Smith might be the biggest loser in the whole 10 year Trump saga so far. That guy can't do anything right.
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 11:58 am
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:57 am to Decatur
Oh I bet. The guy got his arse handed to him by the Supreme Court a couple of times. Now it’s the House’s turn.
Where do we stand today on the war crimes? You still crawfishing or are you back on the war crime train???
Where do we stand today on the war crimes? You still crawfishing or are you back on the war crime train???
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 11:58 am
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:58 am to The Boat
quote:
Jack Smith might be the biggest loser in the whole 10 yea Trump saga so far. That guy can't do anything right.
Smith has always been the willful stooge for the Deep State.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:58 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Now it’s the House’s turn.
You think it should be a public hearing?
Posted on 12/3/25 at 11:59 am to loogaroo
SFP spent multiple years defending Jack Smith
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:04 pm to Jbird
quote:
Gonna be another no thank you, frick off I am not coming.
The problem is that the House has to vote on a "contempt" resolution (which would also include the issuing of an arrest warrant). While it requires only a simple majority, I think there are too many RINOs to get it passed.
And that's IF the resolution was proposed in the first place.
This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:05 pm to Bard
quote:This.
I think there are too many RINOs to get it passed.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:07 pm to texag7
quote:
SFP spent multiple years defending Jack Smith
His hero.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:09 pm to texag7
quote:
SFP spent multiple years defending Jack Smith
A better description is that I responded to bad/dumb arguments about his prosecutions while giving general analysis about the litigations
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:09 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Jim Jordan
quote:
subpoena
The irony is strong
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:30 pm to The Boat
quote:
loogaroo
Jack Smith might be the biggest loser in the whole 10 year Trump saga so far. That guy can't do anything right.
True, but some of the "law boys" here LOVE him.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:52 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You think it should be a public hearing?
Sure. Why not?
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:56 pm to Jbird
quote:
Gonna be another no thank you, frick off I am not coming.
Can't do that anymore. But, he will take the 5th.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 12:57 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
You think it should be a public hearing?
Well, we need to get the producers and directors lined up...but yeah.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:19 pm to BBONDS25
I think so too.
I’ve just read letters from Smith’s lawyer that he’s been ready to testify at a public hearing. Wondering why the need for a subpoena if he agrees to show up.
I’ve just read letters from Smith’s lawyer that he’s been ready to testify at a public hearing. Wondering why the need for a subpoena if he agrees to show up.
Posted on 12/3/25 at 1:22 pm to boosiebadazz
Since it's a deposition subpoena I imagine they don't want it public.
Popular
Back to top


8











