Started By
Message

Dems gonna try to convict Hegseth of war crimes?

Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:01 pm
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
53021 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:01 pm

quote:

A quick note on @SecWar.

Democrats never wanted @PeteHegseth.

He was and is a threat to permanent Washington’s status quo.

They didn’t defeat the nomination and they tried hard. I saw all the behind the scenes craziness. He was their top target.

Since then there have been countless “anonymous” leaks meant to undermine him and thwart President Trump and other Realists in the Administration. Bogus story after bogus story. It’s the same tired playbook.

And for their next act? —They want him tried for war crimes. Yep—war crimes. They intend to prosecute another political opponent. They have lost it. Congressional Democrats are fueled by a radicalized Leftist base and are hellbent on power. The rules don’t matter to them. At all.

Sound familiar? Russiagate, Dem censorship, Covid tyranny, Dem weaponization of DOJ

TO MY FELLOW REPUBLICANS: Understand this reality and never bend the knee to this bullshite. Fight back.

The liberal media will never love you
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
2455 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:33 pm to
Guilty is as guilty does.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56527 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Guilty is as guilty does.



Cite the statute that was violated and the witness that will testify to that fact. Guarantee you can’t.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8036 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:43 pm to
I think Hegseth has done a great job. Reading the tea leaves, IF the double tap happened, I think Admiral Bradley or someone lower will take the fall.

It's not the Democrats who will decide the matter. It's RINOS such as Senator Wicker who will determine Hegseth's fate.

Personally, I think it's about a 60% chance that the killing of survivors was ordered. We should know relatively quickly.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 2:47 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18493 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:46 pm to
You can’t fight an asymmetric “war” symmetrically.

The Dems would have you believe otherwise.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43834 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Dems gonna try to convict Hegseth of war crimes?


First I definitely believe that the establishment military senior leadership hates having to answer to a former major and the dems have not having their establishment buddies in charge. Second I do not believe killing drug smugglers is a war crime. However for argument's sake how are they going to prosecute him if it is a war crime? War crimes are a federal crime right? Federal crimes require the DOJ to prosecute right? There is no way in hell that Bondi's DOJ is going to prosecute him. Are they going to try and force Trump and/or Bondi to appoint a special counsel or are they going to try and prosecute a federal crime in a state court since the Pentagon is technically in Virginia?
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35353 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Congressional Democrats are fueled by a radicalized Leftist base

IMO it's the other way around.

Congressional Democrats and the Establishment Narrative Control Apparatus have created and are power-feeding an increasingly radicalized Leftist base.

The base are just sheep who go where the shepherds lead them.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112264 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:09 pm to
What's that I smell? A pardon? Actually signed by the President?

Posted by PurpleCrush
ATL
Member since May 2014
1239 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:11 pm to
Would normally have a bipartisan investigation to find out the facts to what happened and who did what, legally or not of these killings, then decide.

Todays world, that will not happen.
Congress has no idea as to who is doing what
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 3:12 pm
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56527 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Would normally have a bipartisan investigation to find out the facts to what happened and who did what, legally or not of these killings, then decide.


An investigation based upon what? A sourceless allegation? Is that really the standard you want to open an investigation?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295123 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Reading the tea leaves, IF the double tap happened, I think Admiral Bradley or someone lower will take the fall.


Military baws seem to be taking the admirals side on social media. I still find it hard to believe the story is 100% factual.

Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
8036 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

An investigation based upon what? A sourceless allegation? Is that really the standard you want to open an investigation?


I don't understand your indignation, Barry. What's the harm of this letter?

"Dear Admiral Bradley:

Please produce all recordings relating to the attack in question. The ranking member and I will review under the strictest confidentiality.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Respectfully,
Senator Wicker"

Nothing there, move on. No co-operation? Subpoena him and call him in for an Executive Session hearing.
Posted by PurpleCrush
ATL
Member since May 2014
1239 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:20 pm to
Well, are we at war with Venezuela?
Supposedly he is ready to do land strikes too?

America first, no new wars?

How is Venezuela a threat to Americans today?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56527 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Well, are we at war with Venezuela?

The last declared war was in 1942.

quote:

Supposedly he is ready to do land strikes too?


We can talk about that when it happens.

quote:

America first, no new wars?


That’s my preference.

quote:

How is Venezuela a threat to Americans today?


Be more specific.


Also. None of that has any relevance to you stating you want the standard to open investigations to be non sourced allegations from the media. Care to address that?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66371 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:24 pm to
That's why I laugh at the war crimes talk. It's not even that. It's just straight up murder of another country's civilians.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56527 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

I don't understand your indignation, Barry. What's the harm of this letter? "Dear Admiral Bradley: Please produce all recordings relating to the attack in question. The ranking member and I will review under the strictest confidentiality. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Senator Wicker"


You’re an attorney. “What’s the harm” is not an acceptable standard. You are ok with the standard moving forward to open an investigation being an unsourced allegation from the media?
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22379 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

How is Venezuela a threat to Americans today?


I wish they'd tell us.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56527 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

It's just straight up murder of another country's civilians.


Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21173 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:27 pm to
This will never happen..... everything about this is legal.

Besides, when Trump leaves office, he can simply grant pardons like Sleepy Joe did!!!!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125176 posts
Posted on 12/2/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Guilty is as guilty does.


Bitch assed is as bitch assed does.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram