Trump didn’t actually name any names connected to seditious behavior

quote:

---

Mike Johnson responds to Trump’s post about the dems seditious behavior

---

It's not Mike's job to correct the record from someone else.

quote:

---

& the law is still the law

---

And nobody can point to what law was broken (with some irony in there, I must add)

I personally believe what Trump did was more of a warning shot than anything to the dems to watch their rhetoric because they were dangerously close to seditious behavior.

But the lawyers involved might see they actually stepped over the line

quote:

---

I think we are drowning in it at this point.

---

Just look at all this reaction to people being told to follow the law, and then threatening them with statements like "the law is the law"

No shite. Isn't that their point?

Their argument from what I’ve seen is that they say they said to disobey ‘illegal’ orders.

Leavitt was asked about it in her press conference and that was the retort the press gave her

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

"Why aren't you talking about what these members of Congress are doing to encourage it and incite VIOLENCE?"

"They are literally saying to 1.3 million active duty service members to defy the chain of command, not to follow lawful orders!"

REPORTER: Actually, they said refuse ILLEGAL orders!

"They're suggesting, Nancy, that the President has given illegal orders, which he has NOT."

"Every single order that is given to this United States military by this Commander in Chief and through this chain of command, through the Secretary of War is lawful and the courts have proven that."

"This administration has an unparalleled record at the Supreme Court because we are following the laws. don't defy court orders."

"We do things by the books and to suggest and encourage that active duty service members defy the chain of command is a very dangerous thing for sitting members of Congress to do and they should be held accountable - and that's what the president wants to see!"

---

quote:

---

Their argument from what I’ve seen is that they say they said to disobey ‘illegal’ orders.

---

Which they more than suggest are ACTIVELY BEING GIVEN.

It's all a bunch of being too clever by half goofiness. Which, is why have have zero issue with throwing it back in their faces in this manner.

He didn't need to. They self-identified in the video.

Why are you here? If your position is that Kelly and friends, didnt ackshywully ask the military to defy the CIC, than in the interest of consistency, you would have to acknowledge that Trump didn't ackshywully charge anyone with sedition. All either side did was throw out thinly veiled accusations on social media - which happens literally every day.